Animal research in cardiac arrest
© 2023 The Author(s)..
The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an overview of lessons learned from experimental cardiac arrest studies, limitations, translation to clinical studies, ethical considerations and future directions. Cardiac arrest animal studies have provided valuable insights into the pathophysiology of cardiac arrest, the effects of various interventions, and the development of resuscitation techniques. However, there are limitations to animal models that should be considered when interpreting results. Systematic reviews have demonstrated that animal models rarely reflect the clinical condition seen in humans, nor the complex treatment that occurs during and after a cardiac arrest. Furthermore, animal models of cardiac arrest are at a significant risk of bias due to fundamental issues in performing and/or reporting critical methodological aspects. Conducting clinical trials targeting the management of rare cardiac arrest causes like e.g. hyperkalemia and pulmonary embolism is challenging due to the scarcity of eligible patients. For these research questions, animal models might provide the highest level of evidence and can potentially guide clinical practice. To continuously push cardiac arrest science forward, animal studies must be conducted and reported rigorously, designed to avoid bias and answer specific research questions. To ensure the continued relevance and generation of valuable new insights from animal studies, new approaches and techniques may be needed, including animal register studies, systematic reviews and multilaboratory trials.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:17 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Resuscitation plus - 17(2023) vom: 22. März, Seite 100511 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Andersen, Lars W [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Animals |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 28.12.2023 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100511 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM366396226 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM366396226 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231229124253.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231229s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100511 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1241.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM366396226 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38148966 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Andersen, Lars W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Animal research in cardiac arrest |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 28.12.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2023 The Author(s). | ||
520 | |a The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an overview of lessons learned from experimental cardiac arrest studies, limitations, translation to clinical studies, ethical considerations and future directions. Cardiac arrest animal studies have provided valuable insights into the pathophysiology of cardiac arrest, the effects of various interventions, and the development of resuscitation techniques. However, there are limitations to animal models that should be considered when interpreting results. Systematic reviews have demonstrated that animal models rarely reflect the clinical condition seen in humans, nor the complex treatment that occurs during and after a cardiac arrest. Furthermore, animal models of cardiac arrest are at a significant risk of bias due to fundamental issues in performing and/or reporting critical methodological aspects. Conducting clinical trials targeting the management of rare cardiac arrest causes like e.g. hyperkalemia and pulmonary embolism is challenging due to the scarcity of eligible patients. For these research questions, animal models might provide the highest level of evidence and can potentially guide clinical practice. To continuously push cardiac arrest science forward, animal studies must be conducted and reported rigorously, designed to avoid bias and answer specific research questions. To ensure the continued relevance and generation of valuable new insights from animal studies, new approaches and techniques may be needed, including animal register studies, systematic reviews and multilaboratory trials | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Animals | |
650 | 4 | |a Cardiac arrest | |
650 | 4 | |a Cardiopulmonary resuscitation | |
650 | 4 | |a Experimental | |
650 | 4 | |a Preclinical | |
700 | 1 | |a Vammen, Lauge |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Granfeldt, Asger |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Resuscitation plus |d 2020 |g 17(2023) vom: 22. März, Seite 100511 |w (DE-627)NLM319671704 |x 2666-5204 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2023 |g day:22 |g month:03 |g pages:100511 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100511 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 17 |j 2023 |b 22 |c 03 |h 100511 |