Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes After Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer in Elderly Individuals : A Propensity Score-Matching Study
© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology..
BACKGROUND: Robotic gastrectomy (RG) has been widely used to treat gastric cancer. However, whether the short-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy are superior to those of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer has not been reported.
METHODS: The study enrolled of 594 elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent robotic or laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. The RG cohort was matched 1:3 with the LG cohort using propensity score-matching (PSM).
RESULTS: After PSM, 121 patients were included in the robot group and 363 patients in the laparoscopic group. Excluding the docking and undocking times, the operation time of the two groups was similar (P = 0.617). The RG group had less intraoperative blood loss than the LG group (P < 0.001). The time to ambulation and first liquid food intake was significantly shorter in the RG group than in the LG group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.14). Significantly more lymph nodes were dissected in the RG group than in the LG group (P = 0.001). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was started earlier in the RG group than in the LG group (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: For elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer, RG is safe and feasible. Compared with LG, RG is associated with less intraoperative blood loss; a faster postoperative recovery time, allowing a greater number of lymph nodes to be dissected; and earlier adjuvant chemotherapy.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:31 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Annals of surgical oncology - 31(2024), 4 vom: 22. März, Seite 2679-2688 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Zheng, Zhi-Wei [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Advanced gastric cancer |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 06.03.2024 Date Revised 06.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1245/s10434-023-14808-2 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM366329154 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM366329154 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240306232641.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231227s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1245/s10434-023-14808-2 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1318.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM366329154 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38142258 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zheng, Zhi-Wei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes After Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer in Elderly Individuals |b A Propensity Score-Matching Study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 06.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 06.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Robotic gastrectomy (RG) has been widely used to treat gastric cancer. However, whether the short-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy are superior to those of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer has not been reported | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: The study enrolled of 594 elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent robotic or laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. The RG cohort was matched 1:3 with the LG cohort using propensity score-matching (PSM) | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: After PSM, 121 patients were included in the robot group and 363 patients in the laparoscopic group. Excluding the docking and undocking times, the operation time of the two groups was similar (P = 0.617). The RG group had less intraoperative blood loss than the LG group (P < 0.001). The time to ambulation and first liquid food intake was significantly shorter in the RG group than in the LG group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.14). Significantly more lymph nodes were dissected in the RG group than in the LG group (P = 0.001). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was started earlier in the RG group than in the LG group (P = 0.02) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: For elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer, RG is safe and feasible. Compared with LG, RG is associated with less intraoperative blood loss; a faster postoperative recovery time, allowing a greater number of lymph nodes to be dissected; and earlier adjuvant chemotherapy | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Advanced gastric cancer | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Elderly | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Robotic gastrectomy | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lin, Mi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zheng, Hua-Long |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Qi-Yue |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lin, Jian-Xian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xue, Zhen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xu, Bin-Bin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Jin-Tao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wei, Ling-Hua |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zheng, Hong-Hong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lin, Jia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Fu-Hai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shen, Li-Li |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Wen-Feng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Ling-Kang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huang, Chang-Ming |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Ping |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of surgical oncology |d 1995 |g 31(2024), 4 vom: 22. März, Seite 2679-2688 |w (DE-627)NLM074734997 |x 1534-4681 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2024 |g number:4 |g day:22 |g month:03 |g pages:2679-2688 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14808-2 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 31 |j 2024 |e 4 |b 22 |c 03 |h 2679-2688 | ||