Classification of breed combinations for slaughter pigs based on genotypes-modeling DNA samples of crossbreeds as fuzzy sets from purebred founders
Copyright © 2023 Vinje, Brustad, Heggli, Sevillano, Van Son and Gangsei..
In pig production, the production animals are generally three- or four-way crossbreeds. Reliable information regarding the breed of origin of slaughtered pigs is useful, even a prerequisite, for a number of purposes, e.g., evaluating potential breed effects on carcass grading. Genetic data from slaughtered pigs can easily be extracted and used for crossbreed classification. In the current study, four classification methods, namely, random forest (RF), ADMIXTURE, partial least squares regression (PLSR), and partial least squares together with quadratic discriminant analysis (PLS-QDA) were evaluated on simulated (n = 7,500) genomic data of crossbreeds. The derivation of the theory behind PLS-QDA is a major part of the current study, whereas RF and ADMIXTURE are known and well-described in the literature. Classification success (CS) rate, square loss (SL), and Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence loss for the simulated data were used to compare methods. Overall, PLS-QDA performed best with 99%/0.0018/0.002 (CS/SL/KL) vs. 97%/0.0084/0.051, 97%/0.0087/0.0623, and 17%/0.068/0.39 for PLSR, ADMIXTURE, and RF, respectively. PLS-QDA and ADMIXTURE, as the most relevant methods, were used on a real dataset (n = 1,013) from Norway where the two largest classes contained 532 and 192 (PLS-QDA), and 531 and 193 (ADMIXTURE) individuals, respectively. These two classes were expected to be dominating a priori. The Bayesian nature of PLS-QDA enables inclusion of desirable features such as a separate class "unknown breed combination" and informative priors for crossbreeds, making this a preferable method for the classification of breed combination in the industry.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:14 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Frontiers in genetics - 14(2023) vom: 01., Seite 1289130 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Vinje, H [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
ADMIXTURE |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 21.12.2023 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3389/fgene.2023.1289130 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM366069659 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM366069659 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231227135541.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231227s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3389/fgene.2023.1289130 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1234.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM366069659 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38116292 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Vinje, H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Classification of breed combinations for slaughter pigs based on genotypes-modeling DNA samples of crossbreeds as fuzzy sets from purebred founders |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 21.12.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2023 Vinje, Brustad, Heggli, Sevillano, Van Son and Gangsei. | ||
| 520 | |a In pig production, the production animals are generally three- or four-way crossbreeds. Reliable information regarding the breed of origin of slaughtered pigs is useful, even a prerequisite, for a number of purposes, e.g., evaluating potential breed effects on carcass grading. Genetic data from slaughtered pigs can easily be extracted and used for crossbreed classification. In the current study, four classification methods, namely, random forest (RF), ADMIXTURE, partial least squares regression (PLSR), and partial least squares together with quadratic discriminant analysis (PLS-QDA) were evaluated on simulated (n = 7,500) genomic data of crossbreeds. The derivation of the theory behind PLS-QDA is a major part of the current study, whereas RF and ADMIXTURE are known and well-described in the literature. Classification success (CS) rate, square loss (SL), and Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence loss for the simulated data were used to compare methods. Overall, PLS-QDA performed best with 99%/0.0018/0.002 (CS/SL/KL) vs. 97%/0.0084/0.051, 97%/0.0087/0.0623, and 17%/0.068/0.39 for PLSR, ADMIXTURE, and RF, respectively. PLS-QDA and ADMIXTURE, as the most relevant methods, were used on a real dataset (n = 1,013) from Norway where the two largest classes contained 532 and 192 (PLS-QDA), and 531 and 193 (ADMIXTURE) individuals, respectively. These two classes were expected to be dominating a priori. The Bayesian nature of PLS-QDA enables inclusion of desirable features such as a separate class "unknown breed combination" and informative priors for crossbreeds, making this a preferable method for the classification of breed combination in the industry | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ADMIXTURE | |
| 650 | 4 | |a breed classification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a crossbreeds | |
| 650 | 4 | |a fuzzy classification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a partial least squares | |
| 650 | 4 | |a quadratic discriminant analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a single-nucleotide polymorphism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a slaughter pigs | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Brustad, H K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Heggli, A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sevillano, C A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Van Son, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gangsei, L E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Frontiers in genetics |d 2010 |g 14(2023) vom: 01., Seite 1289130 |w (DE-627)NLM20904649X |x 1664-8021 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2023 |g day:01 |g pages:1289130 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1289130 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 14 |j 2023 |b 01 |h 1289130 | ||