Prognostic Impact of the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index After Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma : A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
INTRODUCTION: The modified 5-item frailty index can be used to evaluate frailty using 5 routinely encountered clinical variables. This study aimed to assess the impact of the modified 5-item frailty index in patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, we calculated the modified 5-item frailty index scores of patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma between 2010 and 2022. Patients were categorized into the high (≥2) and low (≤1) modified 5-item frailty index score groups. To assess the prognostic influence of the preoperative modified 5-item frailty index, we conducted Cox proportional regression analyses concerning progression-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival.
RESULTS: Of 434 patients, 82, and 352 were classified into the high and low modified 5-item frailty index score groups, respectively. The high modified 5-item frailty index score group had significantly higher rates of severe surgical complications (P = .038) and ≥30 days of hospitalization (P = .049) and significantly worse progression-free (P = .012) and overall survival (P = .002) than the low modified 5-item frailty index score group. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that a high modified 5-item frailty index score was independently associated with poor progression-free (P = .044), overall (P = .017), and cancer-specific survival (P = .005).
CONCLUSION: The modified 5-item frailty index emerged as a significant predictive indicator of severe surgical complications and postoperative survival outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:22 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Clinical genitourinary cancer - 22(2024), 2 vom: 25. Apr., Seite 322-329.e3 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Kohada, Yuki [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Biomarkers |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 11.03.2024 Date Revised 09.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.015 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM365947296 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM365947296 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240410232337.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231227s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.015 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1371.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM365947296 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38104030 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1558-7673(23)00266-5 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kohada, Yuki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prognostic Impact of the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index After Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma |b A Multicenter Retrospective Study |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 11.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 09.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a INTRODUCTION: The modified 5-item frailty index can be used to evaluate frailty using 5 routinely encountered clinical variables. This study aimed to assess the impact of the modified 5-item frailty index in patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma | ||
520 | |a PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, we calculated the modified 5-item frailty index scores of patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma between 2010 and 2022. Patients were categorized into the high (≥2) and low (≤1) modified 5-item frailty index score groups. To assess the prognostic influence of the preoperative modified 5-item frailty index, we conducted Cox proportional regression analyses concerning progression-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Of 434 patients, 82, and 352 were classified into the high and low modified 5-item frailty index score groups, respectively. The high modified 5-item frailty index score group had significantly higher rates of severe surgical complications (P = .038) and ≥30 days of hospitalization (P = .049) and significantly worse progression-free (P = .012) and overall survival (P = .002) than the low modified 5-item frailty index score group. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that a high modified 5-item frailty index score was independently associated with poor progression-free (P = .044), overall (P = .017), and cancer-specific survival (P = .005) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: The modified 5-item frailty index emerged as a significant predictive indicator of severe surgical complications and postoperative survival outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy | ||
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Biomarkers | |
650 | 4 | |a Geriatric assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a Prognosis | |
650 | 4 | |a Urogenital surgical procedures | |
650 | 4 | |a Urologic neoplasms | |
700 | 1 | |a Goto, Keisuke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tasaka, Ryo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nishida, Kensuke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hashimoto, Kunihiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Iwamoto, Hideo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hatayama, Tomoya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Furutani, Tomoki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Miyamoto, Shunsuke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kobatake, Kohei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kitano, Hiroyuki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ikeda, Kenichiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Goriki, Akihiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hieda, Keisuke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hayashi, Tetsutaro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hinata, Nobuyuki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical genitourinary cancer |d 2005 |g 22(2024), 2 vom: 25. Apr., Seite 322-329.e3 |w (DE-627)NLM160229936 |x 1938-0682 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:25 |g month:04 |g pages:322-329.e3 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.015 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 22 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 25 |c 04 |h 322-329.e3 |