Comparing and validating air sampling methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection in HVAC ducts of student dorms
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved..
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic demonstrated the threat of airborne pathogenic respiratory viruses such as the airborne Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The ability to detect circulating viruses in a workplace or dormitory setting allows an early warning system that can alert occupants to implement precautions (e.g. masking) and/or trigger individual testing to allow isolation and quarantine measures to halt contagion. This work extends and validates the first successful detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus in dormitory Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems and compares different air sampling methods and media types combined with optimized quantitative Reverse-Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. The study was performed in two environments; large dormitories of students who underwent periodic testing for COVID-19 (unknown environment) and the HVAC air from a suite with a student who had tested positive for COVID-19 (known dorm). The air sampling methods were performed using Filter Cassettes, BioSampler, AerosolSense Sampler and Button Sampler (with four media types with different pore sizes of 5 μm, 3 μm, 3 μm (gelatin), and 1.2 μm). The SARS-CoV-2 positive air samples were compared with the positive samples collected by individual student campus track tracing methods using PCR testing on saliva and nasopharyngeal samples. The results show a detection rate of 73% in the unknown environment and a 78% detection rate in the known dorm. Our data show that the virus was detectable with all the sampling methods we employed. However, the AerosolSense sampler and BioSampler performed the best at 63% and 61% detection rates, compared to 25% for the Filter Cassettes and 23% for the Button Sampler. Despite the success rate, it is not possible to definitively conclude which method is most sensitive due to the limited number of samples. These results show that with careful sampling and optimized PCR methods, pathogenic respiratory viruses can be detected in large buildings using HVAC return air.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:343 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) - 343(2024) vom: 15. Feb., Seite 123164 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Sousan, Sinan [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Airborne transmission |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 14.02.2024 Date Revised 14.02.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123164 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM365944033 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM365944033 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240214233013.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231227s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123164 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1293.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM365944033 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38103710 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0269-7491(23)02166-8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sousan, Sinan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparing and validating air sampling methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection in HVAC ducts of student dorms |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 14.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 14.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic demonstrated the threat of airborne pathogenic respiratory viruses such as the airborne Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The ability to detect circulating viruses in a workplace or dormitory setting allows an early warning system that can alert occupants to implement precautions (e.g. masking) and/or trigger individual testing to allow isolation and quarantine measures to halt contagion. This work extends and validates the first successful detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus in dormitory Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems and compares different air sampling methods and media types combined with optimized quantitative Reverse-Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. The study was performed in two environments; large dormitories of students who underwent periodic testing for COVID-19 (unknown environment) and the HVAC air from a suite with a student who had tested positive for COVID-19 (known dorm). The air sampling methods were performed using Filter Cassettes, BioSampler, AerosolSense Sampler and Button Sampler (with four media types with different pore sizes of 5 μm, 3 μm, 3 μm (gelatin), and 1.2 μm). The SARS-CoV-2 positive air samples were compared with the positive samples collected by individual student campus track tracing methods using PCR testing on saliva and nasopharyngeal samples. The results show a detection rate of 73% in the unknown environment and a 78% detection rate in the known dorm. Our data show that the virus was detectable with all the sampling methods we employed. However, the AerosolSense sampler and BioSampler performed the best at 63% and 61% detection rates, compared to 25% for the Filter Cassettes and 23% for the Button Sampler. Despite the success rate, it is not possible to definitively conclude which method is most sensitive due to the limited number of samples. These results show that with careful sampling and optimized PCR methods, pathogenic respiratory viruses can be detected in large buildings using HVAC return air | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Airborne transmission | |
| 650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Contamination infection control | |
| 650 | 4 | |a PCR analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV-2 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ventilation system | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Boatman, Marina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Johansen, Lauren |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fan, Ming |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Roper, Rachel L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) |d 1987 |g 343(2024) vom: 15. Feb., Seite 123164 |w (DE-627)NLM087741504 |x 1873-6424 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:343 |g year:2024 |g day:15 |g month:02 |g pages:123164 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123164 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 343 |j 2024 |b 15 |c 02 |h 123164 | ||