Connecting pathogen transmission and healthcare worker cognition : a cognitive task analysis of infection prevention and control practices during simulated patient care
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ..
BACKGROUND: Relatively little is known about the cognitive processes of healthcare workers that mediate between performance-shaping factors (eg, workload, time pressure) and adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. We taxonomised the cognitive work involved in IPC practices and assessed its role in how pathogens spread.
METHODS: Forty-two registered nurses performed patient care tasks in a standardised high-fidelity simulation. Afterwards, participants watched a video of their simulation and described what they were thinking, which we analysed to obtain frequencies of macrocognitive functions (MCFs) in the context of different IPC practices. Performance in the simulation was the frequency at which participants spread harmless surrogates for pathogens (bacteriophages). Using a tertiary split, participants were categorised into a performance group: high, medium or low. To identify associations between the three variables-performance groups, MCFs and IPC practices-we used multiblock discriminant correspondence analysis (MUDICA).
RESULTS: MUDICA extracted two factors discriminating between performance groups. Factor 1 captured differences between high and medium performers. High performers monitored the situation for contamination events and mitigated risks by applying formal and informal rules or managing their uncertainty, particularly for sterile technique and cleaning. Medium performers engaged more in future-oriented cognition, anticipating contamination events and planning their workflow, across many IPC practices. Factor 2 distinguished the low performers from the medium and high performers who mitigated risks with informal rules and sacrificed IPC practices when managing tradeoffs, all in the context of minimising cross-contamination from physical touch.
CONCLUSIONS: To reduce pathogen transmission, new approaches to training IPC (eg, cognitive skills training) and system design are needed. Interventions should help nurses apply their knowledge of IPC fluidly during patient care, prioritising and monitoring situations for risks and deciding how to mitigate risks. Planning IPC into one's workflow is beneficial but may not account for the unpredictability of patient care.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2023 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMJ quality & safety - (2023) vom: 28. Nov. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Mumma, Joel M [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Decision making |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 05.12.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016230 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM365411000 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM365411000 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226101614.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016230 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1217.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM365411000 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38050151 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)bmjqs-2023-016230 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mumma, Joel M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Connecting pathogen transmission and healthcare worker cognition |b a cognitive task analysis of infection prevention and control practices during simulated patient care |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 05.12.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Relatively little is known about the cognitive processes of healthcare workers that mediate between performance-shaping factors (eg, workload, time pressure) and adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. We taxonomised the cognitive work involved in IPC practices and assessed its role in how pathogens spread | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Forty-two registered nurses performed patient care tasks in a standardised high-fidelity simulation. Afterwards, participants watched a video of their simulation and described what they were thinking, which we analysed to obtain frequencies of macrocognitive functions (MCFs) in the context of different IPC practices. Performance in the simulation was the frequency at which participants spread harmless surrogates for pathogens (bacteriophages). Using a tertiary split, participants were categorised into a performance group: high, medium or low. To identify associations between the three variables-performance groups, MCFs and IPC practices-we used multiblock discriminant correspondence analysis (MUDICA) | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: MUDICA extracted two factors discriminating between performance groups. Factor 1 captured differences between high and medium performers. High performers monitored the situation for contamination events and mitigated risks by applying formal and informal rules or managing their uncertainty, particularly for sterile technique and cleaning. Medium performers engaged more in future-oriented cognition, anticipating contamination events and planning their workflow, across many IPC practices. Factor 2 distinguished the low performers from the medium and high performers who mitigated risks with informal rules and sacrificed IPC practices when managing tradeoffs, all in the context of minimising cross-contamination from physical touch | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: To reduce pathogen transmission, new approaches to training IPC (eg, cognitive skills training) and system design are needed. Interventions should help nurses apply their knowledge of IPC fluidly during patient care, prioritising and monitoring situations for risks and deciding how to mitigate risks. Planning IPC into one's workflow is beneficial but may not account for the unpredictability of patient care | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a decision making | |
| 650 | 4 | |a human factors | |
| 650 | 4 | |a infection control | |
| 650 | 4 | |a simulation | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Weaver, Bradley W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Morgan, Jill S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ghassemian, Golpar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gannon, Paige R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Burke, Kylie B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Berryhill, Brandon A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a MacKay, Rebecca E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, Lindsay |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kraft, Colleen S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMJ quality & safety |d 2011 |g (2023) vom: 28. Nov. |w (DE-627)NLM204824729 |x 2044-5423 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2023 |g day:28 |g month:11 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016230 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2023 |b 28 |c 11 | ||