Patient perspectives of using reproductive autonomy to measure quality of care : a qualitative study
© 2023. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: Current measures of reproductive health care quality, such as rates of "unintended" pregnancies, neglect to incorporate patients' desires and center their reproductive autonomy. This study explores patients' perspectives on and receptivity to alternative metrics for measuring quality of such care.
METHODS: An online research recruitment firm identified eligible participants living in New York, ages 18-45, self-identifying as women, and having visited a primary care provider in the last year. We conducted five virtual focus groups and eight in-depth interviews with participants (N = 30) in 2021. Semi-structured guides queried on ideal clinic interactions when preventing or attempting pregnancy and their perspectives on how to measure the quality of such encounters, including receptivity to using our definition of reproductive autonomy to develop one such metric: "whether the patient got the reproductive health service or counseling that they wanted to get, while having all the information about and access to their options, and not feeling forced into anything." We employed an inductive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Participants wanted care that was non-judgmental, respectful, and responsive to their needs and preferences. For pregnancy prevention, many preferred unbiased information about contraceptive options to help make their own decisions. For pregnancy, many desired comprehensive information and more provider support. There was considerable support for using reproductive autonomy to measure quality of care.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients had distinct desires in their preferred approach to discussions about preventing versus attempting pregnancy. Quality of reproductive health care should be measured from the patient's perspective. Given participants' demonstrated support, future research is needed to develop and test a new metric that assesses patients' perceptions of reproductive autonomy during clinical encounters.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:23 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC women's health - 23(2023), 1 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 647 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Manze, Meredith G [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Contraception |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 06.12.2023 Date Revised 17.01.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12905-023-02804-3 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM365407313 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM365407313 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240118232014.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12905-023-02804-3 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1263.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM365407313 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38049782 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Manze, Meredith G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Patient perspectives of using reproductive autonomy to measure quality of care |b a qualitative study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 06.12.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 17.01.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2023. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Current measures of reproductive health care quality, such as rates of "unintended" pregnancies, neglect to incorporate patients' desires and center their reproductive autonomy. This study explores patients' perspectives on and receptivity to alternative metrics for measuring quality of such care | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: An online research recruitment firm identified eligible participants living in New York, ages 18-45, self-identifying as women, and having visited a primary care provider in the last year. We conducted five virtual focus groups and eight in-depth interviews with participants (N = 30) in 2021. Semi-structured guides queried on ideal clinic interactions when preventing or attempting pregnancy and their perspectives on how to measure the quality of such encounters, including receptivity to using our definition of reproductive autonomy to develop one such metric: "whether the patient got the reproductive health service or counseling that they wanted to get, while having all the information about and access to their options, and not feeling forced into anything." We employed an inductive thematic analysis | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Participants wanted care that was non-judgmental, respectful, and responsive to their needs and preferences. For pregnancy prevention, many preferred unbiased information about contraceptive options to help make their own decisions. For pregnancy, many desired comprehensive information and more provider support. There was considerable support for using reproductive autonomy to measure quality of care | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Patients had distinct desires in their preferred approach to discussions about preventing versus attempting pregnancy. Quality of reproductive health care should be measured from the patient's perspective. Given participants' demonstrated support, future research is needed to develop and test a new metric that assesses patients' perceptions of reproductive autonomy during clinical encounters | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Contraception | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Metrics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pregnancy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reproductive health | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Contraceptive Agents |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Srinivasulu, Silpa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jones, Heidi E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC women's health |d 2001 |g 23(2023), 1 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 647 |w (DE-627)NLM113193734 |x 1472-6874 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:05 |g month:12 |g pages:647 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02804-3 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 23 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 05 |c 12 |h 647 | ||