Inequities among patient placement in emergency department hallway treatment spaces
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: Limited capacity in the emergency department (ED) secondary to boarding and crowding has resulted in patients receiving care in hallways to provide access to timely evaluation and treatment. However, there are concerns raised by physicians and patients regarding a decrease in patient centered care and quality resulting from hallway care. We sought to explore social risk factors associated with hallway placement and operational outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: Observational study between July 2017 and February 2020. Primary outcome was the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of patient placement in a hallway treatment space adjusting for patient demographics and ED operational factors. Secondary outcomes included left without being seen (LWBS), discharge against medical advice (AMA), elopement, 72-h ED revisit, 10-day ED revisit and escalation of care during boarding.
RESULTS: Among 361,377 ED visits, 100,079 (27.7%) visits were assigned to hallway beds. Patient insurance coverage (Medicaid (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01,1.06) and Self-pay/Other (1.08, (1.03, 1.13))) with comparison to private insurance, and patient sex (Male (1.08, (1.06, 1.10))) with comparison to female sex are associated with higher odds of hallway placement but patient age, race, and language were not. These associations are adjusted for ED census, triage assigned severity, ED staffing, boarding level, and time effect, with social factors mutually adjusted. Additionally adjusting for patients' social factors, patients placed in hallways had higher odds of elopement (1.23 (1.07,1.41)), 72-h ED revisit (1.33 (1.08, 1.64)) and 10-day ED revisit (1.23 (1.11, 1.36)) comparing with patients placed in regular ED rooms. We did not find statistically significant associations between hallway placement and LWBS, discharge AMA, or escalation of care.
CONCLUSION: While hallway usage is ad hoc, we find consistent differences in care delivery with those insured by Medicaid and self-pay or male sex being placed in hallway beds. Further work should examine how new front-end processes such as provider in triage or split flow may be associated with inequities in patient access to emergency and hospital care.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:76 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
The American journal of emergency medicine - 76(2024) vom: 24. Jan., Seite 70-74 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Tuffuor, Kwame [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Emergency medicine |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 22.01.2024 Date Revised 22.01.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.013 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM364978511 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM364978511 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240122231941.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.013 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1267.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM364978511 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38006634 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0735-6757(23)00617-4 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tuffuor, Kwame |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Inequities among patient placement in emergency department hallway treatment spaces |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 22.01.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 22.01.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Limited capacity in the emergency department (ED) secondary to boarding and crowding has resulted in patients receiving care in hallways to provide access to timely evaluation and treatment. However, there are concerns raised by physicians and patients regarding a decrease in patient centered care and quality resulting from hallway care. We sought to explore social risk factors associated with hallway placement and operational outcomes | ||
| 520 | |a STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: Observational study between July 2017 and February 2020. Primary outcome was the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of patient placement in a hallway treatment space adjusting for patient demographics and ED operational factors. Secondary outcomes included left without being seen (LWBS), discharge against medical advice (AMA), elopement, 72-h ED revisit, 10-day ED revisit and escalation of care during boarding | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Among 361,377 ED visits, 100,079 (27.7%) visits were assigned to hallway beds. Patient insurance coverage (Medicaid (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01,1.06) and Self-pay/Other (1.08, (1.03, 1.13))) with comparison to private insurance, and patient sex (Male (1.08, (1.06, 1.10))) with comparison to female sex are associated with higher odds of hallway placement but patient age, race, and language were not. These associations are adjusted for ED census, triage assigned severity, ED staffing, boarding level, and time effect, with social factors mutually adjusted. Additionally adjusting for patients' social factors, patients placed in hallways had higher odds of elopement (1.23 (1.07,1.41)), 72-h ED revisit (1.33 (1.08, 1.64)) and 10-day ED revisit (1.23 (1.11, 1.36)) comparing with patients placed in regular ED rooms. We did not find statistically significant associations between hallway placement and LWBS, discharge AMA, or escalation of care | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: While hallway usage is ad hoc, we find consistent differences in care delivery with those insured by Medicaid and self-pay or male sex being placed in hallway beds. Further work should examine how new front-end processes such as provider in triage or split flow may be associated with inequities in patient access to emergency and hospital care | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Emergency medicine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hallway | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Health equity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Healthcare disparities | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inequities | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Triage | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Su, Huifeng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meng, Lesley |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pinker, Edieal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tarabar, Asim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Van Tonder, Reinier |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chmura, Chris |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Parwani, Vivek |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Venkatesh, Arjun K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sangal, Rohit B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The American journal of emergency medicine |d 1986 |g 76(2024) vom: 24. Jan., Seite 70-74 |w (DE-627)NLM01297868X |x 1532-8171 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:76 |g year:2024 |g day:24 |g month:01 |g pages:70-74 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.013 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 76 |j 2024 |b 24 |c 01 |h 70-74 | ||