Novel endomorphin analogues CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 produce potent and long-lasting antinociception with a favourable side effect profile at the spinal level
© 2023 British Pharmacological Society..
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endomorphins have shown great promise as pharmaceutics for the treatment of pain. We have previously confirmed that novel endomorphin analogues CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 behaved as potent μ agonists and displayed potent antinociceptive activities at the supraspinal and peripheral levels. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the antinociceptive properties of CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 following intrathecal (i.t.) administration. Furthermore, their antinociceptive tolerance and opioid-like side effects were also determined.
EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The spinal antinociceptive effects of CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 were determined in a series of pain models, including acute radiant heat paw withdrawal test, spared nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain, complete Freund's adjuvant-induced inflammatory pain, visceral pain and formalin pain. Antinociceptive tolerance was evaluated in radiant heat paw withdrawal test.
KEY RESULTS: Spinal administration of CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 produced potent and prolonged antinociceptive effects in acute pain. CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 may produce their antinociception through distinct μ receptor subtypes. These two analogues also exhibited significant analgesic activities in neuropathic, inflammatory, visceral and formalin pain at the spinal level. It is noteworthy that CEMR-1 showed non-tolerance-forming analgesic properties, while CEMR-2 exhibited substantially reduced antinociceptive tolerance. Furthermore, both analogues displayed no or reduced side effects on conditioned place preference response, physical dependence, locomotor activity and gastrointestinal transit.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The present investigation demonstrated that CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 displayed potent and long-lasting antinociception with a favourable side effect profile at the spinal level. Therefore, CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 might serve as promising analgesic compounds with minimal opioid-like side effects.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:181 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
British journal of pharmacology - 181(2024), 8 vom: 21. März, Seite 1268-1289 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Zhang, Yu-Zhe [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
1HG84L3525 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 19.03.2024 Date Revised 19.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1111/bph.16287 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM364821078 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM364821078 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240319232339.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bph.16287 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1336.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM364821078 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37990825 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Zhang, Yu-Zhe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Novel endomorphin analogues CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 produce potent and long-lasting antinociception with a favourable side effect profile at the spinal level |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 19.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 19.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2023 British Pharmacological Society. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endomorphins have shown great promise as pharmaceutics for the treatment of pain. We have previously confirmed that novel endomorphin analogues CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 behaved as potent μ agonists and displayed potent antinociceptive activities at the supraspinal and peripheral levels. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the antinociceptive properties of CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 following intrathecal (i.t.) administration. Furthermore, their antinociceptive tolerance and opioid-like side effects were also determined | ||
520 | |a EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The spinal antinociceptive effects of CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 were determined in a series of pain models, including acute radiant heat paw withdrawal test, spared nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain, complete Freund's adjuvant-induced inflammatory pain, visceral pain and formalin pain. Antinociceptive tolerance was evaluated in radiant heat paw withdrawal test | ||
520 | |a KEY RESULTS: Spinal administration of CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 produced potent and prolonged antinociceptive effects in acute pain. CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 may produce their antinociception through distinct μ receptor subtypes. These two analogues also exhibited significant analgesic activities in neuropathic, inflammatory, visceral and formalin pain at the spinal level. It is noteworthy that CEMR-1 showed non-tolerance-forming analgesic properties, while CEMR-2 exhibited substantially reduced antinociceptive tolerance. Furthermore, both analogues displayed no or reduced side effects on conditioned place preference response, physical dependence, locomotor activity and gastrointestinal transit | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The present investigation demonstrated that CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 displayed potent and long-lasting antinociception with a favourable side effect profile at the spinal level. Therefore, CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 might serve as promising analgesic compounds with minimal opioid-like side effects | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 | |
650 | 4 | |a antinociception | |
650 | 4 | |a i.t. administration | |
650 | 4 | |a opioid receptors | |
650 | 4 | |a side effects | |
650 | 4 | |a tolerance | |
650 | 7 | |a Analgesics, Opioid |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Analgesics |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Receptors, Opioid, mu |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Formaldehyde |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 1HG84L3525 |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Si-Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Guo, Xue-Ci |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Liu, Xiao-Han |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Xiao-Fang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Meng-Meng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Qiu, Ting-Ting |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Han, Feng-Tong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Yao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Chang-Lin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t British journal of pharmacology |d 1968 |g 181(2024), 8 vom: 21. März, Seite 1268-1289 |w (DE-627)NLM000001325 |x 1476-5381 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:181 |g year:2024 |g number:8 |g day:21 |g month:03 |g pages:1268-1289 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.16287 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 181 |j 2024 |e 8 |b 21 |c 03 |h 1268-1289 |