A brief mind-body intervention to reduce pain and anxiety during prostate needle biopsy : a clinically integrated randomized controlled trial with 2-staged consent
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc..
OBJECTIVES: Many patients experience pain, anxiety, and discomfort with prostate biopsy, which may discourage enrollment in active surveillance programs or follow-up biopsy. Guided meditation can significantly reduce pain and anxiety during percutaneous biopsy. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief mind-body intervention on patient-reported outcomes after prostate biopsy.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a clinically-integrated randomized controlled trial of a brief mind-body intervention during biopsy compared to usual care at a single tertiary care center from 2018 to 2022. All patients offered transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the clinic with local anesthesia were eligible for enrollment. This clinically integrated trial was conducted simultaneously with a randomized controlled trial of 1-stage and 2-stage consent. The primary outcome was patient-reported pain, anxiety, discomfort, and tolerability on a visual-analog scale (0-10). A 15% improvement was prespecified as clinically relevant. We compared the proportion of men in each arm reporting a severe score (7-10) on any of the 4 scales using Fisher's exact test and then compared means for each scale separately using ANCOVA with randomization stratum (first vs. prior biopsy) as a covariate.
RESULTS: Of 263 eligible patients, 238 enrolled (119 per arm). One hundred seventy-two (72%) enrolled with 2-stage consent. A total of 37/94 (39%) and 38/102 (37%) patients randomized to usual care and intervention, respectively, reported severe scores in any of the 4 domains, a difference of 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] -13, 17%, P = 0.8). There was no evidence of a difference in mean postbiopsy anxiety (P = 0.3), discomfort (P = 0.09), pain (P = 0.4) or tolerability scores (P = 0.2).
CONCLUSIONS: A clinically meaningful benefit for this brief mind-body intervention during prostate biopsy is unlikely. Robust patient enrollment is feasible using 2-stage consent.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:41 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Urologic oncology - 41(2023), 12 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 484.e1-484.e5 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Gaffney, Christopher D [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Biopsy |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 16.12.2023 Date Revised 11.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.09.016 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM364694491 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM364694491 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240411232146.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.09.016 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1372.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM364694491 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37977915 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1078-1439(23)00329-0 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Gaffney, Christopher D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A brief mind-body intervention to reduce pain and anxiety during prostate needle biopsy |b a clinically integrated randomized controlled trial with 2-staged consent |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 16.12.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 11.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: Many patients experience pain, anxiety, and discomfort with prostate biopsy, which may discourage enrollment in active surveillance programs or follow-up biopsy. Guided meditation can significantly reduce pain and anxiety during percutaneous biopsy. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief mind-body intervention on patient-reported outcomes after prostate biopsy | ||
520 | |a METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a clinically-integrated randomized controlled trial of a brief mind-body intervention during biopsy compared to usual care at a single tertiary care center from 2018 to 2022. All patients offered transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the clinic with local anesthesia were eligible for enrollment. This clinically integrated trial was conducted simultaneously with a randomized controlled trial of 1-stage and 2-stage consent. The primary outcome was patient-reported pain, anxiety, discomfort, and tolerability on a visual-analog scale (0-10). A 15% improvement was prespecified as clinically relevant. We compared the proportion of men in each arm reporting a severe score (7-10) on any of the 4 scales using Fisher's exact test and then compared means for each scale separately using ANCOVA with randomization stratum (first vs. prior biopsy) as a covariate | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Of 263 eligible patients, 238 enrolled (119 per arm). One hundred seventy-two (72%) enrolled with 2-stage consent. A total of 37/94 (39%) and 38/102 (37%) patients randomized to usual care and intervention, respectively, reported severe scores in any of the 4 domains, a difference of 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] -13, 17%, P = 0.8). There was no evidence of a difference in mean postbiopsy anxiety (P = 0.3), discomfort (P = 0.09), pain (P = 0.4) or tolerability scores (P = 0.2) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: A clinically meaningful benefit for this brief mind-body intervention during prostate biopsy is unlikely. Robust patient enrollment is feasible using 2-stage consent | ||
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Biopsy | |
650 | 4 | |a Mindfulness | |
650 | 4 | |a Prostate | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized controlled trial | |
700 | 1 | |a Vertosick, Emily A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Carlsson, Sigrid V |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lin, Xin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wolchasty, Natalie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hardbattle, Robin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vickers, Andrew J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ehdaie, Behfar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Urologic oncology |d 1995 |g 41(2023), 12 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 484.e1-484.e5 |w (DE-627)NLM097435058 |x 1873-2496 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2023 |g number:12 |g day:01 |g month:12 |g pages:484.e1-484.e5 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.09.016 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 41 |j 2023 |e 12 |b 01 |c 12 |h 484.e1-484.e5 |