Anaphylaxis in Clinical Trials of Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablets
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus method to identify anaphylaxis in sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) trials. Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) queries (SMQs) are standardized groupings of MedDRA terms used in drug safety monitoring.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a method to identify potential anaphylaxis in SLIT-tablet trials using SMQ searches and case definitions of anaphylaxis adopted from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.
METHODS: The SMQ search tool contained 2 criteria including treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs): (1) narrow MedDRA terms related to anaphylaxis and (2) all AEs with broad MedDRA terms from at least 2 of 3 categories (respiratory/skin/cardiovascular) occurring on the same day. Criteria were applied to a pooled data set of all subjects from 48 timothy grass, ragweed, house dust mite, and tree SLIT-tablet trials (SLIT-tablet, N = 8200; placebo, N = 7033). Additional search strategies were any treatment-emergent AE with MedDRA preferred term "hypersensitivity" and epinephrine administrations. Identified potential cases underwent blinded independent medical expert review. Nonanaphylaxis cases were designated local AEs or mild to moderate systemic reactions.
RESULTS: Using the SMQ search tool and after subsequent medical review, 8 anaphylaxis cases were identified; 3 were considered treatment-related, resulting in a proportion of anaphylaxis cases/subject of 0.02% (2 of 8200) with SLIT-tablet and 0.01% (1 of 7033) with placebo. One additional anaphylaxis case related to SLIT-tablet was identified by the preferred term "hypersensitivity." The 3 anaphylaxis cases associated with SLIT-tablet treatment were not life-threatening. The epinephrine administration rate was 17 of 8200 (0.2%) with SLIT-tablet treatment and 2 of 7033 (0.03%) with placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: SMQ search criteria for identifying potential anaphylaxis related to SLIT were developed. Anaphylaxis was rare for SLIT-tablets.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:12 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice - 12(2024), 1 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 85-95.e4 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Nolte, Hendrik [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 09.01.2024 Date Revised 23.02.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.011 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM364644907 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM364644907 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240229143837.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.011 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1303.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM364644907 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37972922 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S2213-2198(23)01253-9 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Nolte, Hendrik |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Anaphylaxis in Clinical Trials of Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablets |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 09.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 23.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: There is no consensus method to identify anaphylaxis in sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) trials. Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) queries (SMQs) are standardized groupings of MedDRA terms used in drug safety monitoring | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To develop a method to identify potential anaphylaxis in SLIT-tablet trials using SMQ searches and case definitions of anaphylaxis adopted from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease | ||
520 | |a METHODS: The SMQ search tool contained 2 criteria including treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs): (1) narrow MedDRA terms related to anaphylaxis and (2) all AEs with broad MedDRA terms from at least 2 of 3 categories (respiratory/skin/cardiovascular) occurring on the same day. Criteria were applied to a pooled data set of all subjects from 48 timothy grass, ragweed, house dust mite, and tree SLIT-tablet trials (SLIT-tablet, N = 8200; placebo, N = 7033). Additional search strategies were any treatment-emergent AE with MedDRA preferred term "hypersensitivity" and epinephrine administrations. Identified potential cases underwent blinded independent medical expert review. Nonanaphylaxis cases were designated local AEs or mild to moderate systemic reactions | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Using the SMQ search tool and after subsequent medical review, 8 anaphylaxis cases were identified; 3 were considered treatment-related, resulting in a proportion of anaphylaxis cases/subject of 0.02% (2 of 8200) with SLIT-tablet and 0.01% (1 of 7033) with placebo. One additional anaphylaxis case related to SLIT-tablet was identified by the preferred term "hypersensitivity." The 3 anaphylaxis cases associated with SLIT-tablet treatment were not life-threatening. The epinephrine administration rate was 17 of 8200 (0.2%) with SLIT-tablet treatment and 2 of 7033 (0.03%) with placebo | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: SMQ search criteria for identifying potential anaphylaxis related to SLIT were developed. Anaphylaxis was rare for SLIT-tablets | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a Allergic rhinitis | |
650 | 4 | |a Allergy immunotherapy | |
650 | 4 | |a Anaphylaxis | |
650 | 4 | |a Epinephrine | |
650 | 4 | |a Grass | |
650 | 4 | |a House dust mite | |
650 | 4 | |a Ragweed | |
650 | 4 | |a Sampson criteria | |
650 | 4 | |a Standardized MedDRA queries | |
650 | 4 | |a Sublingual immunotherapy | |
650 | 4 | |a Systemic allergic reaction | |
650 | 4 | |a Tree | |
650 | 7 | |a Epinephrine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a YKH834O4BH |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Tablets |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Allergens |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Calderon, Moisés A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bernstein, David I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Roberts, Graham |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Azuma, Ryuji |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Juhl, Ruta Gronskyte |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hulstrøm, Veronica |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice |d 2013 |g 12(2024), 1 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 85-95.e4 |w (DE-627)NLM227247523 |x 2213-2201 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:01 |g month:01 |g pages:85-95.e4 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.011 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 12 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 01 |c 01 |h 85-95.e4 |