Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and the CoronaVac vaccines and boosters in healthcare workers
The evidence on the waning protection of COVID-19 vaccines has been reviewed by the World Health Organization and has led to consideration of the need for booster doses. This study aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19, and the COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers who received various types (inactive or m-RNA) and doses (2 to 4 doses) of the COVID-19 vaccine. The study was conducted with a total of 3,009 healthcare workers between August 1 and November 30, 2021 at a university hospital. Six different vaccination statuses were evaluated in the study. The effectiveness for COVID-19 infection, after adjusting for age, sex, and position, was highest in those who received two doses of CoronaVac and two doses of BNT162b2 (89.3%, 95% CI 72.2-95.9%) and was lowest in those who received two doses of CoronaVac (29%, 95% CI - 8-53%). The adjusted effectiveness of two doses of CoronaVac for COVID-19 infection was not significant (21.0%, 95% CI - 20.7-48.3%) but increased significantly with a booster dose of CoronaVac or BNT162b2. One or two doses of the BNT162b2 booster demonstrated higher effectiveness in comparison to a single dose of the CoronaVac booster. These results indicate the need for a booster dose, and heterologous boosting with BNT162b2 may be a better option for higher effectiveness for those who received two doses of CoronaVac. Future studies should evaluate the need for further booster doses and their long-term effects.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:19 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics - 19(2023), 3 vom: 15. Dez., Seite 2275445 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Çulpan, Hazal Cansu [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
BNT162 Vaccine |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 16.11.2023 Date Revised 19.11.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1080/21645515.2023.2275445 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM364562595 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM364562595 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226211156.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/21645515.2023.2275445 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1215.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM364562595 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37964650 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Çulpan, Hazal Cansu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and the CoronaVac vaccines and boosters in healthcare workers |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 16.11.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 19.11.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a The evidence on the waning protection of COVID-19 vaccines has been reviewed by the World Health Organization and has led to consideration of the need for booster doses. This study aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19, and the COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers who received various types (inactive or m-RNA) and doses (2 to 4 doses) of the COVID-19 vaccine. The study was conducted with a total of 3,009 healthcare workers between August 1 and November 30, 2021 at a university hospital. Six different vaccination statuses were evaluated in the study. The effectiveness for COVID-19 infection, after adjusting for age, sex, and position, was highest in those who received two doses of CoronaVac and two doses of BNT162b2 (89.3%, 95% CI 72.2-95.9%) and was lowest in those who received two doses of CoronaVac (29%, 95% CI - 8-53%). The adjusted effectiveness of two doses of CoronaVac for COVID-19 infection was not significant (21.0%, 95% CI - 20.7-48.3%) but increased significantly with a booster dose of CoronaVac or BNT162b2. One or two doses of the BNT162b2 booster demonstrated higher effectiveness in comparison to a single dose of the CoronaVac booster. These results indicate the need for a booster dose, and heterologous boosting with BNT162b2 may be a better option for higher effectiveness for those who received two doses of CoronaVac. Future studies should evaluate the need for further booster doses and their long-term effects | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a BNT162b2 | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a CoronaVac | |
650 | 4 | |a booster dose | |
650 | 4 | |a heterologous boosting | |
650 | 4 | |a vaccine effectiveness | |
650 | 7 | |a sinovac COVID-19 vaccine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a COVID-19 Vaccines |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a BNT162 Vaccine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Vaccines |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Aydın, Sümeyye Nur |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Uygur, Abdulkerim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sayılı, Uğurcan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Şeker, Erkam |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Balkan, I Lker İnanç |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Karaali, Rıdvan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Budak, Beyhan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Keskindemirci, Yılmaz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Saltoğlu, Neşe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Can, Günay |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics |d 2012 |g 19(2023), 3 vom: 15. Dez., Seite 2275445 |w (DE-627)NLM21576823X |x 2164-554X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2023 |g number:3 |g day:15 |g month:12 |g pages:2275445 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2275445 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 19 |j 2023 |e 3 |b 15 |c 12 |h 2275445 |