Functional recovery in a cohort of ECMO and non-ECMO acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors
© 2023. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: The mortality benefit of VV-ECMO in ARDS has been extensively studied, but the impact on long-term functional outcomes of survivors is poorly defined. We aimed to assess the association between ECMO and functional outcomes in a contemporaneous cohort of survivors of ARDS.
METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study of ARDS survivors who presented to follow-up clinic. The primary outcome was FVC% predicted. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the impact of ECMO on the primary outcome.
RESULTS: This study enrolled 110 survivors of ARDS, 34 of whom were managed using ECMO. The ECMO cohort was younger (35 [28, 50] vs. 51 [44, 61] years old, p < 0.01), less likely to have COVID-19 (58% vs. 96%, p < 0.01), more severely ill based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (7 [5, 9] vs. 4 [3, 6], p < 0.01), dynamic lung compliance (15 mL/cmH20 [11, 20] vs. 27 mL/cmH20 [23, 35], p < 0.01), oxygenation index (26 [22, 33] vs. 9 [6, 11], p < 0.01), and their need for rescue modes of ventilation. ECMO patients had significantly longer lengths of hospitalization (46 [27, 62] vs. 16 [12, 31] days, p < 0.01) ICU stay (29 [19, 43] vs. 10 [5, 17] days, p < 0.01), and duration of mechanical ventilation (24 [14, 42] vs. 10 [7, 17] days, p < 0.01). Functional outcomes were similar in ECMO and non-ECMO patients. ECMO did not predict changes in lung function when adjusting for age, SOFA, COVID-19 status, or length of hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the FVC% predicted, or other markers of pulmonary, neurocognitive, or psychiatric functional recovery outcomes, when comparing a contemporaneous clinic-based cohort of survivors of ARDS managed with ECMO to those without ECMO.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:27 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Critical care (London, England) - 27(2023), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 440 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Snyder, Mackenzie [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
ARDS |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 27.11.2023 Date Revised 30.11.2023 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1186/s13054-023-04724-y |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM364559209 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM364559209 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226095704.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s13054-023-04724-y |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1215.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM364559209 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37964311 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Snyder, Mackenzie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Functional recovery in a cohort of ECMO and non-ECMO acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 27.11.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 30.11.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2023. The Author(s). | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: The mortality benefit of VV-ECMO in ARDS has been extensively studied, but the impact on long-term functional outcomes of survivors is poorly defined. We aimed to assess the association between ECMO and functional outcomes in a contemporaneous cohort of survivors of ARDS | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study of ARDS survivors who presented to follow-up clinic. The primary outcome was FVC% predicted. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the impact of ECMO on the primary outcome | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: This study enrolled 110 survivors of ARDS, 34 of whom were managed using ECMO. The ECMO cohort was younger (35 [28, 50] vs. 51 [44, 61] years old, p < 0.01), less likely to have COVID-19 (58% vs. 96%, p < 0.01), more severely ill based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (7 [5, 9] vs. 4 [3, 6], p < 0.01), dynamic lung compliance (15 mL/cmH20 [11, 20] vs. 27 mL/cmH20 [23, 35], p < 0.01), oxygenation index (26 [22, 33] vs. 9 [6, 11], p < 0.01), and their need for rescue modes of ventilation. ECMO patients had significantly longer lengths of hospitalization (46 [27, 62] vs. 16 [12, 31] days, p < 0.01) ICU stay (29 [19, 43] vs. 10 [5, 17] days, p < 0.01), and duration of mechanical ventilation (24 [14, 42] vs. 10 [7, 17] days, p < 0.01). Functional outcomes were similar in ECMO and non-ECMO patients. ECMO did not predict changes in lung function when adjusting for age, SOFA, COVID-19 status, or length of hospitalization | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the FVC% predicted, or other markers of pulmonary, neurocognitive, or psychiatric functional recovery outcomes, when comparing a contemporaneous clinic-based cohort of survivors of ARDS managed with ECMO to those without ECMO | ||
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a ARDS | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a ECMO | |
650 | 4 | |a Functional recovery | |
650 | 4 | |a Long-term outcomes | |
650 | 4 | |a Pulmonary function tests | |
700 | 1 | |a Njie, Binta Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Grabenstein, Ilana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Viola, Sara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Abbas, Hatoon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bhatti, Waqas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lee, Ryan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Traficante, Rosalie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yeung, Siu Yan Amy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chow, Jonathan H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tabatabai, Ali |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Taylor, Bradley S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dahi, Siamak |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Scalea, Thomas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rabin, Joseph |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Grazioli, Alison |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Calfee, Carolyn S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Britton, Noel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Levine, Andrea R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Critical care (London, England) |d 1997 |g 27(2023), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 440 |w (DE-627)NLM097399787 |x 1466-609X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:14 |g month:11 |g pages:440 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04724-y |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 27 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 14 |c 11 |h 440 |