Data Mining and Fusion Framework for In-Home Monitoring Applications
Sensor Data Fusion (SDT) algorithms and models have been widely used in diverse applications. One of the main challenges of SDT includes how to deal with heterogeneous and complex datasets with different formats. The present work utilised both homogenous and heterogeneous datasets to propose a novel SDT framework. It compares data mining-based fusion software packages such as RapidMiner Studio, Anaconda, Weka, and Orange, and proposes a data fusion framework suitable for in-home applications. A total of 574 privacy-friendly (binary) images and 1722 datasets gleaned from thermal and Radar sensing solutions, respectively, were fused using the software packages on instances of homogeneous and heterogeneous data aggregation. Experimental results indicated that the proposed fusion framework achieved an average Classification Accuracy of 84.7% and 95.7% on homogeneous and heterogeneous datasets, respectively, with the help of data mining and machine learning models such as Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Neural Network, Random Forest, Stochastic Gradient Descent, Support Vector Machine, and CN2 Induction. Further evaluation of the Sensor Data Fusion framework based on cross-validation of features indicated average values of 94.4% for Classification Accuracy, 95.7% for Precision, and 96.4% for Recall. The novelty of the proposed framework includes cost and timesaving advantages for data labelling and preparation, and feature extraction.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:23 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) - 23(2023), 21 vom: 24. Okt. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Ekerete, Idongesit [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Data mining |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 17.11.2023 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3390/s23218661 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM364519991 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM364519991 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226095616.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/s23218661 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1215.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM364519991 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37960361 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)8661 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ekerete, Idongesit |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Data Mining and Fusion Framework for In-Home Monitoring Applications |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 17.11.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Sensor Data Fusion (SDT) algorithms and models have been widely used in diverse applications. One of the main challenges of SDT includes how to deal with heterogeneous and complex datasets with different formats. The present work utilised both homogenous and heterogeneous datasets to propose a novel SDT framework. It compares data mining-based fusion software packages such as RapidMiner Studio, Anaconda, Weka, and Orange, and proposes a data fusion framework suitable for in-home applications. A total of 574 privacy-friendly (binary) images and 1722 datasets gleaned from thermal and Radar sensing solutions, respectively, were fused using the software packages on instances of homogeneous and heterogeneous data aggregation. Experimental results indicated that the proposed fusion framework achieved an average Classification Accuracy of 84.7% and 95.7% on homogeneous and heterogeneous datasets, respectively, with the help of data mining and machine learning models such as Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Neural Network, Random Forest, Stochastic Gradient Descent, Support Vector Machine, and CN2 Induction. Further evaluation of the Sensor Data Fusion framework based on cross-validation of features indicated average values of 94.4% for Classification Accuracy, 95.7% for Precision, and 96.4% for Recall. The novelty of the proposed framework includes cost and timesaving advantages for data labelling and preparation, and feature extraction | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Radar sensor | |
| 650 | 4 | |a data mining | |
| 650 | 4 | |a in-home | |
| 650 | 4 | |a machine learning | |
| 650 | 4 | |a sensing solution | |
| 650 | 4 | |a sensor fusion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a thermal sensor | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Garcia-Constantino, Matias |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nugent, Christopher |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a McCullagh, Paul |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a McLaughlin, James |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) |d 2007 |g 23(2023), 21 vom: 24. Okt. |w (DE-627)NLM187985170 |x 1424-8220 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2023 |g number:21 |g day:24 |g month:10 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23218661 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 23 |j 2023 |e 21 |b 24 |c 10 | ||