Adjusted win ratio using the inverse probability of treatment weighting
The win ratio method has been increasingly applied in the design and analysis of clinical trials. However, the win ratio method is a univariate approach that does not allow for adjusting for baseline imbalances in covariates, although a stratified win ratio can be calculated when the number of strata is small. This paper proposes an adjusted win ratio to control for such imbalances by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. We derive the adjusted win ratio with its variance and suggest three IPTW adjustments: IPTW-average treatment effect (IPTW-ATE), stabilized IPTW-ATE (SIPTW-ATE) and IPTW-average treatment effect in the treated (IPTW-ATT). The proposed adjusted methods are applied to analyse a composite outcome in the CHARM trial. The statistical properties of the methods are assessed through simulations. Results show that adjusted win ratio methods can correct the win ratio for covariate imbalances at baseline. Simulation results show that the three proposed adjusted win ratios have similar power to detect the treatment difference and have slightly lower power than the corresponding adjusted Cox models when the assumption of proportional hazards holds true but have consistently higher power than adjusted Cox models when the proportional hazard assumption is violated.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2023 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics - (2023) vom: 10. Nov., Seite 1-16 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Wang, Duolao [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Adjusted win ratio |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 22.11.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1080/10543406.2023.2275759 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM364390697 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM364390697 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226095331.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/10543406.2023.2275759 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1214.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM364390697 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37947400 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wang, Duolao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Adjusted win ratio using the inverse probability of treatment weighting |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 22.11.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a The win ratio method has been increasingly applied in the design and analysis of clinical trials. However, the win ratio method is a univariate approach that does not allow for adjusting for baseline imbalances in covariates, although a stratified win ratio can be calculated when the number of strata is small. This paper proposes an adjusted win ratio to control for such imbalances by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. We derive the adjusted win ratio with its variance and suggest three IPTW adjustments: IPTW-average treatment effect (IPTW-ATE), stabilized IPTW-ATE (SIPTW-ATE) and IPTW-average treatment effect in the treated (IPTW-ATT). The proposed adjusted methods are applied to analyse a composite outcome in the CHARM trial. The statistical properties of the methods are assessed through simulations. Results show that adjusted win ratio methods can correct the win ratio for covariate imbalances at baseline. Simulation results show that the three proposed adjusted win ratios have similar power to detect the treatment difference and have slightly lower power than the corresponding adjusted Cox models when the assumption of proportional hazards holds true but have consistently higher power than adjusted Cox models when the proportional hazard assumption is violated | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Adjusted win ratio | |
| 650 | 4 | |a baseline imbalance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a propensity score | |
| 650 | 4 | |a proportional hazard assumption | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zheng, Sirui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cui, Ying |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a He, Nengjie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Tao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huang, Bo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics |d 1991 |g (2023) vom: 10. Nov., Seite 1-16 |w (DE-627)NLM012811432 |x 1520-5711 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2023 |g day:10 |g month:11 |g pages:1-16 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2023.2275759 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2023 |b 10 |c 11 |h 1-16 | ||