Quantitative Measurement on Contrast-Enhanced CT Distinguishes Small Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Benign Renal Tumors : A Multicenter Study
Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential of quantitative measurements on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in differentiating small (≤4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from benign renal tumors, including fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fpAML) and renal oncocytoma (RO).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 244 patients with pathologically confirmed ccRCC (n = 184) and benign renal tumors (fpAML, n = 50; RO, n = 10) were randomly assigned into training cohort (n = 193) and test cohort 1 (n = 51), while external test cohort 2 (n = 50) was from another hospital. Quantitative parameters were obtained from CECT (unenhanced phase, UP; corticomedullary phase, CMP; nephrographic phase, NP; excretory phase, EP) by measuring attenuation of renal mass and cortex and subsequently calculated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between these parameters and ccRCC. Finally, the constructed models were compared with radiologists' diagnoses.
RESULTS: In univariable analysis, UP-related parameters, particularly UPC-T (cortex minus tumor attenuation on UP), demonstrated AUC of 0.766 in training cohort, 0.901 in test cohort 1, 0.805 in test cohort 2. The heterogeneity-related parameter SD (standard deviation) showed AUC of 0.781, 0.834, and 0.875 respectively. In multivariable analysis, model 1 incorporating UPC-T, NPC-T (cortex minus tumor attenuation on NP), CMPT-UPT (tumor attenuation on CMP minus UP), and SD yielded AUC of 0.866, 0.923, and 0.949 respectively. When compared with radiologists, multivariate models demonstrated higher accuracy (0.800-0.860) and sensitivity (0.794-0.971) than radiologists' assessments (accuracy: 0.700-0.720, sensitivity: 0.588-0.706).
CONCLUSION: Quantitative measurements on CECT, particularly UP- and heterogeneity-related parameters, have potential to discriminate ccRCC and benign renal tumors (fpAML, RO).
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:31 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Academic radiology - 31(2024), 4 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 1460-1471 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Luo, Shiwei [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Abdomen |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 15.04.2024 Date Revised 18.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.014 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM364372036 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM364372036 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240419232129.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.014 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1380.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM364372036 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37945492 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1076-6332(23)00550-0 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Luo, Shiwei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Quantitative Measurement on Contrast-Enhanced CT Distinguishes Small Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Benign Renal Tumors |b A Multicenter Study |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 15.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 18.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential of quantitative measurements on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in differentiating small (≤4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from benign renal tumors, including fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fpAML) and renal oncocytoma (RO) | ||
520 | |a MATERIALS AND METHODS: 244 patients with pathologically confirmed ccRCC (n = 184) and benign renal tumors (fpAML, n = 50; RO, n = 10) were randomly assigned into training cohort (n = 193) and test cohort 1 (n = 51), while external test cohort 2 (n = 50) was from another hospital. Quantitative parameters were obtained from CECT (unenhanced phase, UP; corticomedullary phase, CMP; nephrographic phase, NP; excretory phase, EP) by measuring attenuation of renal mass and cortex and subsequently calculated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between these parameters and ccRCC. Finally, the constructed models were compared with radiologists' diagnoses | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: In univariable analysis, UP-related parameters, particularly UPC-T (cortex minus tumor attenuation on UP), demonstrated AUC of 0.766 in training cohort, 0.901 in test cohort 1, 0.805 in test cohort 2. The heterogeneity-related parameter SD (standard deviation) showed AUC of 0.781, 0.834, and 0.875 respectively. In multivariable analysis, model 1 incorporating UPC-T, NPC-T (cortex minus tumor attenuation on NP), CMPT-UPT (tumor attenuation on CMP minus UP), and SD yielded AUC of 0.866, 0.923, and 0.949 respectively. When compared with radiologists, multivariate models demonstrated higher accuracy (0.800-0.860) and sensitivity (0.794-0.971) than radiologists' assessments (accuracy: 0.700-0.720, sensitivity: 0.588-0.706) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Quantitative measurements on CECT, particularly UP- and heterogeneity-related parameters, have potential to discriminate ccRCC and benign renal tumors (fpAML, RO) | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Abdomen | |
650 | 4 | |a Diagnosis, Differential | |
650 | 4 | |a Kidney Neoplasms | |
650 | 4 | |a Tomography, X-Ray Computed | |
650 | 7 | |a Contrast Media |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Lin, Wanxian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wu, Jialiang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Wanli |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kui, Xiaoyan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lai, Shengsheng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wei, Ruili |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pang, Xinrui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Ye |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a He, Chutong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Liu, Jun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yang, Ruimeng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Academic radiology |d 1995 |g 31(2024), 4 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 1460-1471 |w (DE-627)NLM087676818 |x 1878-4046 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2024 |g number:4 |g day:01 |g month:04 |g pages:1460-1471 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.014 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 31 |j 2024 |e 4 |b 01 |c 04 |h 1460-1471 |