Higher Survival With the Use of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Compared With Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Children Following Cardiac Surgery : Results of an Analysis of the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Registry
Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved..
OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to support cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is increasingly used in children suffering cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. However, its efficacy in promoting survival has not been evaluated. We compared survival of pediatric cardiac surgery patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest who were resuscitated with extracorporeal CPR (E-CPR) to those resuscitated with conventional CPR (C-CPR) using propensity matching.
DESIGN: Retrospective study using multicenter data from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry (2008-2020).
SETTING: Multicenter cardiac arrest database containing cardiac arrest and CPR data from U.S. hospitals.
PATIENTS: Cardiac surgical patients younger than 18 years old who suffered in-hospital cardiac arrest and received greater than or equal to 10 minutes of CPR.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 1223 patients, 741 (60.6%) received C-CPR and 482 (39.4%) received E-CPR. E-CPR utilization increased over the study period ( p < 0.001). Duration of CPR was longer in E-CPR compared with C-CPR recipients (42 vs. 26 min; p < 0.001). In a propensity score matched cohort (382 E-CPR recipients, 382 C-CPR recipients), E-CPR recipients had survival to discharge (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; 95% CI, 1.7-2.9; p < 0.001). E-CPR survival was only higher when CPR duration was greater than 18 minutes. Propensity matched analysis using patients from institutions contributing at least one E-CPR case ( n = 35 centers; 353 E-CPR recipients, 353 C-CPR recipients) similarly demonstrated improved survival in E-CPR recipients compared with those who received C-CPR alone (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.6-2.8; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: E-CPR compared with C-CPR improved survival in children suffering cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery requiring CPR greater than or equal to 10 minutes.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:52 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Critical care medicine - 52(2024), 4 vom: 01. März, Seite 563-573 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Kobayashi, Ryan L [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 15.03.2024 Date Revised 15.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1097/CCM.0000000000006103 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM364297964 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM364297964 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240315232850.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006103 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1330.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM364297964 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37938044 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kobayashi, Ryan L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Higher Survival With the Use of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Compared With Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Children Following Cardiac Surgery |b Results of an Analysis of the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Registry |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 15.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 15.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to support cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is increasingly used in children suffering cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. However, its efficacy in promoting survival has not been evaluated. We compared survival of pediatric cardiac surgery patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest who were resuscitated with extracorporeal CPR (E-CPR) to those resuscitated with conventional CPR (C-CPR) using propensity matching | ||
| 520 | |a DESIGN: Retrospective study using multicenter data from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry (2008-2020) | ||
| 520 | |a SETTING: Multicenter cardiac arrest database containing cardiac arrest and CPR data from U.S. hospitals | ||
| 520 | |a PATIENTS: Cardiac surgical patients younger than 18 years old who suffered in-hospital cardiac arrest and received greater than or equal to 10 minutes of CPR | ||
| 520 | |a INTERVENTIONS: None | ||
| 520 | |a MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 1223 patients, 741 (60.6%) received C-CPR and 482 (39.4%) received E-CPR. E-CPR utilization increased over the study period ( p < 0.001). Duration of CPR was longer in E-CPR compared with C-CPR recipients (42 vs. 26 min; p < 0.001). In a propensity score matched cohort (382 E-CPR recipients, 382 C-CPR recipients), E-CPR recipients had survival to discharge (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; 95% CI, 1.7-2.9; p < 0.001). E-CPR survival was only higher when CPR duration was greater than 18 minutes. Propensity matched analysis using patients from institutions contributing at least one E-CPR case ( n = 35 centers; 353 E-CPR recipients, 353 C-CPR recipients) similarly demonstrated improved survival in E-CPR recipients compared with those who received C-CPR alone (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.6-2.8; p < 0.001) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: E-CPR compared with C-CPR improved survival in children suffering cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery requiring CPR greater than or equal to 10 minutes | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gauvreau, Kimberlee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Alexander, Peta M A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Teele, Sarah A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fynn-Thompson, Francis |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lasa, Javier J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bembea, Melania |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thiagarajan, Ravi R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a American Heart Association’s (AHA) Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation (GWTG-R) Investigators |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Guerguerian, Anne-Marie |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fink, Ericka L |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lasa, Javier J |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Roberts, Joan S |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Su, Lillian |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Brown, Linda L |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dewan, Maya |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bembea, Melania M |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kleinman, Monica |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gupta, Punkaj |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sutton, Robert M |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Reeder, Ron |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sweberg, Todd |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Critical care medicine |d 1973 |g 52(2024), 4 vom: 01. März, Seite 563-573 |w (DE-627)NLM000002631 |x 1530-0293 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:52 |g year:2024 |g number:4 |g day:01 |g month:03 |g pages:563-573 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006103 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 52 |j 2024 |e 4 |b 01 |c 03 |h 563-573 | ||