Instruments to assess post-intensive care syndrome assessment : a scoping review and modified Delphi method study
© 2023. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: The assessment of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) is challenging due to the numerous types of instruments. We herein attempted to identify and propose recommendations for instruments to assess PICS in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors.
METHODS: We conducted a scoping review to identify PICS follow-up studies at and after hospital discharge between 2014 and 2022. Assessment instruments used more than two times were included in the modified Delphi consensus process. A modified Delphi meeting was conducted three times by the PICS committee of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and each score was rated as not important (score: 1-3), important, but not critical (4-6), and critical (7-9). We included instruments with ≥ 70% of respondents rating critical and ≤ 15% of respondents rating not important.
RESULTS: In total, 6972 records were identified in this scoping review, and 754 studies were included in the analysis. After data extraction, 107 PICS assessment instruments were identified. The modified Delphi meeting reached 20 PICS assessment instrument recommendations: (1) in the physical domain: the 6-min walk test, MRC score, and grip strength, (2) in cognition: MoCA, MMSE, and SMQ, (3) in mental health: HADS, IES-R, and PHQ-9, (4) in the activities of daily living: the Barthel Index, IADL, and FIM, (5) in quality of life: SF-36, SF-12, EQ-5D-5L, 3L, and VAS (6), in sleep and pain: PSQI and Brief Pain Inventory, respectively, and (7) in the PICS-family domain: SF-36, HADS, and IES-R.
CONCLUSION: Based on a scoping review and the modified Delphi method, 20 PICS assessment instruments are recommended to assess physical, cognitive, mental health, activities of daily living, quality of life, sleep, and pain in ICU survivors and their families.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:27 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Critical care (London, England) - 27(2023), 1 vom: 07. Nov., Seite 430 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Nakanishi, Nobuto [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Activities of daily living |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 09.11.2023 Date Revised 22.11.2023 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s13054-023-04681-6 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM364280093 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM364280093 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226095116.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s13054-023-04681-6 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1214.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM364280093 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37936249 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nakanishi, Nobuto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Instruments to assess post-intensive care syndrome assessment |b a scoping review and modified Delphi method study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 09.11.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 22.11.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2023. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: The assessment of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) is challenging due to the numerous types of instruments. We herein attempted to identify and propose recommendations for instruments to assess PICS in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: We conducted a scoping review to identify PICS follow-up studies at and after hospital discharge between 2014 and 2022. Assessment instruments used more than two times were included in the modified Delphi consensus process. A modified Delphi meeting was conducted three times by the PICS committee of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and each score was rated as not important (score: 1-3), important, but not critical (4-6), and critical (7-9). We included instruments with ≥ 70% of respondents rating critical and ≤ 15% of respondents rating not important | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: In total, 6972 records were identified in this scoping review, and 754 studies were included in the analysis. After data extraction, 107 PICS assessment instruments were identified. The modified Delphi meeting reached 20 PICS assessment instrument recommendations: (1) in the physical domain: the 6-min walk test, MRC score, and grip strength, (2) in cognition: MoCA, MMSE, and SMQ, (3) in mental health: HADS, IES-R, and PHQ-9, (4) in the activities of daily living: the Barthel Index, IADL, and FIM, (5) in quality of life: SF-36, SF-12, EQ-5D-5L, 3L, and VAS (6), in sleep and pain: PSQI and Brief Pain Inventory, respectively, and (7) in the PICS-family domain: SF-36, HADS, and IES-R | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Based on a scoping review and the modified Delphi method, 20 PICS assessment instruments are recommended to assess physical, cognitive, mental health, activities of daily living, quality of life, sleep, and pain in ICU survivors and their families | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Activities of daily living | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cognitive function | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mental illness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Physical function | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Post-intensive care syndrome | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quality of life | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Keibun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kawauchi, Akira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Okamura, Masatsugu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tanaka, Kohei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Katayama, Sho |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mitani, Yuki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ota, Kohei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Taito, Shunsuke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fudeyasu, Kenichi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Masuka, Yuki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yoshihiro, Shodai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Utsumi, Shu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nishikimi, Mitsuaki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Masuda, Mamoru |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Iida, Yuki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kawai, Yusuke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hatakeyama, Junji |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hifumi, Toru |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Unoki, Takeshi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kawakami, Daisuke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Obata, Kengo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Katsukawa, Hajime |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sumita, Hidenori |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Morisawa, Tomoyuki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Takahashi, Masahiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tsuboi, Norihiko |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kozu, Ryo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Takaki, Shunsuke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Haruna, Junpei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fujinami, Yoshihisa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nosaka, Nobuyuki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Miyamoto, Kyohei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nakamura, Kensuke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kondo, Yutaka |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Inoue, Shigeaki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nishida, Osamu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Critical care (London, England) |d 1997 |g 27(2023), 1 vom: 07. Nov., Seite 430 |w (DE-627)NLM097399787 |x 1466-609X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:07 |g month:11 |g pages:430 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04681-6 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 27 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 07 |c 11 |h 430 | ||