How does a ban on sex-selective abortions affect child health?
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
Bans on sex-selective abortions are typically implemented to make sex ratios more equitable, but they may have adverse effects on surviving children. We examine the impacts of a ban on prenatal sex selection in India on postnatal health outcomes. We first show that the ban increased the share of female children born to mothers, especially among firstborn female families. Strikingly, we also find that the ban led to a worsening of mortality outcomes for both girls and boys in firstborn female families. In terms of mechanisms, we find that fertility increases in firstborn female families after the ban, pointing to the following channel: firstborn female families are disproportionately affected by the ban and are more likely to use the son-biased fertility stopping rule to achieve a desired number of sons. Children in firstborn female families likely face greater competition for parental resources, which may worsen their health.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:33 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Health economics - 33(2024), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 280-309 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Dasgupta, Aparajita [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Ban |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 02.01.2024 Date Revised 02.01.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1002/hec.4772 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM363962638 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM363962638 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240108140758.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/hec.4772 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1246.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM363962638 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37904287 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Dasgupta, Aparajita |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a How does a ban on sex-selective abortions affect child health? |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 02.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 02.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | ||
520 | |a Bans on sex-selective abortions are typically implemented to make sex ratios more equitable, but they may have adverse effects on surviving children. We examine the impacts of a ban on prenatal sex selection in India on postnatal health outcomes. We first show that the ban increased the share of female children born to mothers, especially among firstborn female families. Strikingly, we also find that the ban led to a worsening of mortality outcomes for both girls and boys in firstborn female families. In terms of mechanisms, we find that fertility increases in firstborn female families after the ban, pointing to the following channel: firstborn female families are disproportionately affected by the ban and are more likely to use the son-biased fertility stopping rule to achieve a desired number of sons. Children in firstborn female families likely face greater competition for parental resources, which may worsen their health | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a ban | |
650 | 4 | |a gender discrimination | |
650 | 4 | |a missing women | |
650 | 4 | |a sex-selective abortions | |
650 | 4 | |a son preference | |
650 | 4 | |a ultrasound | |
700 | 1 | |a Sharma, Anisha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Health economics |d 1992 |g 33(2024), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 280-309 |w (DE-627)NLM013224786 |x 1099-1050 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:01 |g month:01 |g pages:280-309 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.4772 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 33 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 01 |c 01 |h 280-309 |