Short-term effect of different returning methods of maize straw on the temperature of black soil plough layer
Clarifying the effect of different maize straw returning methods on soil temperature is crucial for optimizing the management of farmland straw and the efficient utilization of heat resources in the black soil region of Northeast China. To investigate the impacts of straw returning methods on soil temperature, we conducted a field experiment with four treatments during 2018 and 2020, including plough tillage with straw returning (PTSR), rotary tillage with straw returning (RTSR), no-tillage with straw returning (NTSR), and a control treatment of conventional ridge tillage without straw returning (CT). We measured soil temperature and water content at the 5 cm, 15 cm and 30 cm soil layer, and the straw coverage rate during the 3-year maize growth period. We further analyzed the differences of soil temperature in different soil layer under different treatments, accumulated soil temperature and growing degree-days (GDD) above 10 ℃, daily dynamics of soil temperature, the production efficiency of air accumulated temperature among different treatments, and explored factors causing the difference of soil temperature and the production efficiency of air accumulated temperature. Our results showed that different treatments mainly affected soil temperature from the sowing to emergence stage (S-VE) of maize. The daily average soil temperature showed a trend of CT>PTSR>RTSR>NTSR. The differences of soil temperature under different treatments showed a decreasing trend as growth process advanced and soil depth increased. Compared with the CT treatment, soil temperature at 5 cm depth was decreased by 0.86, 1.84 and 3.50 ℃ for PTSR, RTSR, and NTSR treatments, respectively. NTSR significantly reduced the accumulated temperature of ≥10 ℃ in different soil layers and GDD. The accumulated temperature ≥ 10 ℃ at the 5, 15, and 30 cm soil layers decreased by 216.2, 222.7, and 165.1 ℃·d, and the GDD decreased by 201.9, 138.7 and 123.9 ℃·d, respectively. In addition, production efficiency of air accumulated temperature decreased by 9.7% to 15.6% for NTSR. Conclusively, PTSR and RTSR had significant impacts on topsoil temperature during the maize growing period from sowing to emergence, but did not affect the accumulated soil temperature and the production efficiency of air accumulated temperature. However, NTSR significantly reduced topsoil temperature and production efficiency of air accumulated temperature.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:34 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology - 34(2023), 10 vom: 28. Okt., Seite 2693-2702 |
| Sprache: |
Chinesisch |
|---|
| Weiterer Titel: |
玉米秸秆不同还田方式对黑土耕层温度影响的短期效应 |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Li, Rui-Ping [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
English Abstract |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 30.10.2023 Date Revised 30.10.2023 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.13287/j.1001-9332.202310.014 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM363892931 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM363892931 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226094313.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||chi c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202310.014 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1212.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM363892931 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37897276 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a chi | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Li, Rui-Ping |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Short-term effect of different returning methods of maize straw on the temperature of black soil plough layer |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a 玉米秸秆不同还田方式对黑土耕层温度影响的短期效应 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 30.10.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 30.10.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Clarifying the effect of different maize straw returning methods on soil temperature is crucial for optimizing the management of farmland straw and the efficient utilization of heat resources in the black soil region of Northeast China. To investigate the impacts of straw returning methods on soil temperature, we conducted a field experiment with four treatments during 2018 and 2020, including plough tillage with straw returning (PTSR), rotary tillage with straw returning (RTSR), no-tillage with straw returning (NTSR), and a control treatment of conventional ridge tillage without straw returning (CT). We measured soil temperature and water content at the 5 cm, 15 cm and 30 cm soil layer, and the straw coverage rate during the 3-year maize growth period. We further analyzed the differences of soil temperature in different soil layer under different treatments, accumulated soil temperature and growing degree-days (GDD) above 10 ℃, daily dynamics of soil temperature, the production efficiency of air accumulated temperature among different treatments, and explored factors causing the difference of soil temperature and the production efficiency of air accumulated temperature. Our results showed that different treatments mainly affected soil temperature from the sowing to emergence stage (S-VE) of maize. The daily average soil temperature showed a trend of CT>PTSR>RTSR>NTSR. The differences of soil temperature under different treatments showed a decreasing trend as growth process advanced and soil depth increased. Compared with the CT treatment, soil temperature at 5 cm depth was decreased by 0.86, 1.84 and 3.50 ℃ for PTSR, RTSR, and NTSR treatments, respectively. NTSR significantly reduced the accumulated temperature of ≥10 ℃ in different soil layers and GDD. The accumulated temperature ≥ 10 ℃ at the 5, 15, and 30 cm soil layers decreased by 216.2, 222.7, and 165.1 ℃·d, and the GDD decreased by 201.9, 138.7 and 123.9 ℃·d, respectively. In addition, production efficiency of air accumulated temperature decreased by 9.7% to 15.6% for NTSR. Conclusively, PTSR and RTSR had significant impacts on topsoil temperature during the maize growing period from sowing to emergence, but did not affect the accumulated soil temperature and the production efficiency of air accumulated temperature. However, NTSR significantly reduced topsoil temperature and production efficiency of air accumulated temperature | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a English Abstract | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Northeast China | |
| 650 | 4 | |a maize | |
| 650 | 4 | |a soil temperature | |
| 650 | 4 | |a straw return | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Soil |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Luo, Yang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sui, Peng-Xiang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zheng, Hong-Bing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ming, Bo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Shao-Kun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Hao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zheng, Jin-Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology |d 1998 |g 34(2023), 10 vom: 28. Okt., Seite 2693-2702 |w (DE-627)NLM093687095 |x 1001-9332 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:34 |g year:2023 |g number:10 |g day:28 |g month:10 |g pages:2693-2702 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202310.014 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 34 |j 2023 |e 10 |b 28 |c 10 |h 2693-2702 | ||