Individual level analysis of digital proximity tracing for COVID-19 in Belgium highlights major bottlenecks
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited..
To complement labour-intensive conventional contact tracing, digital proximity tracing was implemented widely during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the privacy-centred design of the dominant Google-Apple exposure notification framework has hindered assessment of its effectiveness. Between October 2021 and January 2022, we systematically collected app use and notification receipt data within a test and trace programme targeting around 50,000 university students in Leuven, Belgium. Due to low success rates in each studied step of the digital notification cascade, only 4.3% of exposed contacts (CI: 2.8-6.1%) received such notifications, resulting in 10 times more cases detected through conventional contact tracing. Moreover, the infection risk of digitally traced contacts (5.0%; CI: 3.0-7.7%) was lower than that of conventionally traced non-app users (9.8%; CI: 8.8-10.7%; p = 0.002). Contrary to common perception as near instantaneous, there was a 1.2-day delay (CI: 0.6-2.2) between case PCR result and digital contact notification. These results highlight major limitations of a digital proximity tracing system based on the dominant framework.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:14 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Nature communications - 14(2023), 1 vom: 23. Okt., Seite 6717 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Geenen, Caspar [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 27.10.2023 Date Revised 19.11.2023 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1038/s41467-023-42518-6 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM363644989 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM363644989 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226093808.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1038/s41467-023-42518-6 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1212.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM363644989 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37872213 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Geenen, Caspar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Individual level analysis of digital proximity tracing for COVID-19 in Belgium highlights major bottlenecks |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 27.10.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 19.11.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2023. Springer Nature Limited. | ||
520 | |a To complement labour-intensive conventional contact tracing, digital proximity tracing was implemented widely during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the privacy-centred design of the dominant Google-Apple exposure notification framework has hindered assessment of its effectiveness. Between October 2021 and January 2022, we systematically collected app use and notification receipt data within a test and trace programme targeting around 50,000 university students in Leuven, Belgium. Due to low success rates in each studied step of the digital notification cascade, only 4.3% of exposed contacts (CI: 2.8-6.1%) received such notifications, resulting in 10 times more cases detected through conventional contact tracing. Moreover, the infection risk of digitally traced contacts (5.0%; CI: 3.0-7.7%) was lower than that of conventionally traced non-app users (9.8%; CI: 8.8-10.7%; p = 0.002). Contrary to common perception as near instantaneous, there was a 1.2-day delay (CI: 0.6-2.2) between case PCR result and digital contact notification. These results highlight major limitations of a digital proximity tracing system based on the dominant framework | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
700 | 1 | |a Raymenants, Joren |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gorissen, Sarah |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Thibaut, Jonathan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a McVernon, Jodie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lorent, Natalie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a André, Emmanuel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Nature communications |d 2010 |g 14(2023), 1 vom: 23. Okt., Seite 6717 |w (DE-627)NLM199274525 |x 2041-1723 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:23 |g month:10 |g pages:6717 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42518-6 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 14 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 23 |c 10 |h 6717 |