Erdafitinib versus pembrolizumab in pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer with select FGFR alterations : cohort 2 of the randomized phase III THOR trial
Copyright © 2023 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: Erdafitinib is an oral pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved to treat locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in patients with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations (FGFRalt) who progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy. FGFR-altered tumours are enriched in luminal 1 subtype and may have limited clinical benefit from anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 [PD-(L)1] treatment. This cohort in the randomized, open-label phase III THOR study assessed erdafitinib versus pembrolizumab in anti-PD-(L)1-naive patients with mUC.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years with unresectable advanced/mUC, with select FGFRalt, disease progression on one prior treatment, and who were anti-PD-(L)1-naive were randomized 1 : 1 to receive erdafitinib 8 mg once daily with pharmacodynamically guided uptitration to 9 mg or pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.
RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population (median follow-up 33 months) comprised 175 and 176 patients in the erdafitinib and pembrolizumab arms, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between erdafitinib and pembrolizumab [median 10.9 versus 11.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.51; P = 0.18]. Median PFS for erdafitinib and pembrolizumab was 4.4 and 2.7 months, respectively (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.70-1.10). ORR was 40.0% and 21.6% (relative risk 1.85; 95% CI 1.32-2.59) and median duration of response was 4.3 and 14.4 months for erdafitinib and pembrolizumab, respectively. 64.7% and 50.9% of patients in the erdafitinib and pembrolizumab arms had ≥1 grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs); 5 (2.9%) and 12 (6.9%) patients, respectively, had AEs that led to death.
CONCLUSIONS: Erdafitinib and pembrolizumab had similar median OS in this anti-PD-(L)1-naive, FGFR-altered mUC population. Outcomes with pembrolizumab were better than assumed and aligned with previous reports in non- FGFR-altered populations. Safety results were consistent with the known profiles for erdafitinib and pembrolizumab in this patient population.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:35 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology - 35(2024), 1 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 107-117 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Siefker-Radtke, A O [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 15.01.2024 Date Revised 15.01.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.003 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM363639918 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM363639918 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240115231902.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.003 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1260.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM363639918 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37871702 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0923-7534(23)04021-8 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Siefker-Radtke, A O |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Erdafitinib versus pembrolizumab in pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer with select FGFR alterations |b cohort 2 of the randomized phase III THOR trial |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 15.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 15.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Erdafitinib is an oral pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved to treat locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in patients with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations (FGFRalt) who progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy. FGFR-altered tumours are enriched in luminal 1 subtype and may have limited clinical benefit from anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 [PD-(L)1] treatment. This cohort in the randomized, open-label phase III THOR study assessed erdafitinib versus pembrolizumab in anti-PD-(L)1-naive patients with mUC | ||
520 | |a PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years with unresectable advanced/mUC, with select FGFRalt, disease progression on one prior treatment, and who were anti-PD-(L)1-naive were randomized 1 : 1 to receive erdafitinib 8 mg once daily with pharmacodynamically guided uptitration to 9 mg or pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population (median follow-up 33 months) comprised 175 and 176 patients in the erdafitinib and pembrolizumab arms, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between erdafitinib and pembrolizumab [median 10.9 versus 11.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.51; P = 0.18]. Median PFS for erdafitinib and pembrolizumab was 4.4 and 2.7 months, respectively (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.70-1.10). ORR was 40.0% and 21.6% (relative risk 1.85; 95% CI 1.32-2.59) and median duration of response was 4.3 and 14.4 months for erdafitinib and pembrolizumab, respectively. 64.7% and 50.9% of patients in the erdafitinib and pembrolizumab arms had ≥1 grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs); 5 (2.9%) and 12 (6.9%) patients, respectively, had AEs that led to death | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Erdafitinib and pembrolizumab had similar median OS in this anti-PD-(L)1-naive, FGFR-altered mUC population. Outcomes with pembrolizumab were better than assumed and aligned with previous reports in non- FGFR-altered populations. Safety results were consistent with the known profiles for erdafitinib and pembrolizumab in this patient population | ||
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Clinical Trial, Phase III | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a FGFR | |
650 | 4 | |a erdafitinib | |
650 | 4 | |a metastatic urothelial cancer | |
650 | 4 | |a overall survival | |
650 | 4 | |a pembrolizumab | |
650 | 4 | |a safety | |
650 | 7 | |a pembrolizumab |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a DPT0O3T46P |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a erdafitinib |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 890E37NHMV |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Pyrazoles |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Quinoxalines |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Matsubara, N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Park, S H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Huddart, R A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Burgess, E F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Özgüroğlu, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Valderrama, B P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Laguerre, B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Basso, U |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Triantos, S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Akapame, S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kean, Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Deprince, K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mukhopadhyay, S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Loriot, Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a THOR cohort 2 investigators |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bastick, Patricia |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Sewak, Sanjeev |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tran, Ben |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pichler, Martin |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Shariat, Shahrokh |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Rottey, Sylvie |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Schatteman, Peter |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Schrijvers, Dirk |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Verschaeve, Vincent |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Vulsteke, Christof |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Barros Leite Ferreira, Luiza Aleixo |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a de Santana Gomes Andrea Juliana, Pereira |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Junior, Joao Antonio |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Azevedo, Sergio |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bastos, Diogo |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Borges, Giuliano |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Dettino, Aldo |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Antonio, Pires Luis |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Luz, Murilo |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Martins, Suelen |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Mota, Jose Mauricio |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Toledo, Joseane |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Eigl, Bernhard |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Finch, Daygen |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Gingerich, Joel |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Dong, Haiying |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Huang, Jian |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Jin, Jie |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pan, Hongming |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Sun, Zhongquan |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tian, Ye |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Wan, Ben |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Wu, Bin |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Xu, Ting |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Xue, Wei |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhou, Fangjian |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Barthelemy, Philippe |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Borchiellini, Delphine |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Calcagno, Fabien |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Carnot, Aurelien |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Cornillon, Pierre |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Delva, Remy |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Emambux, Sheik |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Houede, Nadine |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Laguerre, Brigitte |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Lauridant, Géraldine |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Loriot, Yohann |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Mahammedi, Hakim |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Maillet, Denis |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pouessel, Damien |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Roubaud, Guilhem |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Schlurmann-Constans, Friederike |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tosi, Diego |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Zanetta, Sylvie |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Banek, Severine |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Feyerabend, Susan |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kramer, Mario |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Niegisch, Guenther |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Nuhn, Philipp |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Schnabel, Marco |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Wuelfing, Christian |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Baka, Sofia |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bamias, Aristotelis |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fountzilas, George |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kalofonos, Harabolos |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Karalis, Konstantinos |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kotsakis, Athanasios |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Timotheadou, Eleni |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Landherr, Laszlo |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Mangel, Laszlo |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pe'er, Avivit |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Levratovsky, Meital |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Basso, Umberto |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Battelli, Nicola |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Cavo, Alessia |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a De Giorgi, Ugo |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Doni, Laura |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Galli, Luca |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Gigante, Maria Olga |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Guadalupi, Valentina |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Maio, Michele |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Milesi, Laura |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Nolè, Franco |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Scagliotti, Giorgio |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tortora, Giampaolo |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fukasawa, Satoshi |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Harabayashi, Toru |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kamiya, Naoto |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kawahara, Takashi |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kawakita, Mutsushi |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Matsubara, Nobunaki |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Matsumoto, Kazumasa |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Nishimura, Kazuo |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Rikiya, Taoka |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Shimizu, Nobuaki |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tagaki, Toshio |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kang, Taek Won |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kim, Jwa Hoon |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kim, SeHyun |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Lee, Hyo Jin |e investigator |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology |d 1990 |g 35(2024), 1 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 107-117 |w (DE-627)NLM012606308 |x 1569-8041 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:15 |g month:01 |g pages:107-117 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.003 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 35 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 15 |c 01 |h 107-117 |