Effectiveness of neural mobilisation for the treatment of nerve-related cervicobrachial pain : a systematic review with subgroup meta-analysis
Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Pain..
ABSTRACT: Neural mobilisations (NM) have been advocated for the treatment of nerve-related cervicobrachial pain; however, it is unclear what types of patients with nerve-related cervicobrachial pain (if any) may benefit. Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, PeDro, Cinahl, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until December 2022. Randomised controlled trials were included if they assessed the effectiveness of NM in nerve-related cervicobrachial pain, and outcome measures were pain intensity and/or disability. Studies were classified according to their inclusion/exclusion criteria as radiculopathy , Wainner cluster , Hall , and Elvey cluster or other . Meta-analyses with subgroup analyses were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Rob2 tool. Twenty-seven studies were included. For pain and disability reduction, NM was found to be more effective than no treatment (pooled pain mean difference [MD] = -2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -3.81 to -1.81; pooled disability standardized mean difference = -1.55, 95% CI = -2.72 to -0.37), increased the effectiveness of standard physiotherapy as an adjuvant when compared with standard physiotherapy alone (pooled pain MD = -1.44, 95% CI = -1.98 to -0.89; pooled disability MD = -11.07, 95% CI = -16.38 to -5.75) but was no more effective than cervical traction (pooled pain MD = -0.33, 95% CI = -1.35 to 0.68; pooled disability MD = -10.09, 95% CI = -21.89 to 1.81). For disability reduction, NM was found to be more effective than exercise (pooled MD = -18.27, 95% CI = -20.29 to -17.44). In most comparisons, there were significant differences in the effectiveness of NM between the subgroups. Neural mobilisations was consistently more effective than all alternative interventions (no treatment, traction, exercise, and standard physiotherapy alone) in 13 studies classified as Wainner cluster . PROSPERO registration: CRD42022376087.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:165 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Pain - 165(2024), 3 vom: 01. Feb., Seite 537-549 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Lascurain-Aguirrebeña, Ion [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 14.02.2024 Date Revised 14.02.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003071 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM363625364 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM363625364 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240214232850.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003071 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1292.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM363625364 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37870223 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lascurain-Aguirrebeña, Ion |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effectiveness of neural mobilisation for the treatment of nerve-related cervicobrachial pain |b a systematic review with subgroup meta-analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 14.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 14.02.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Pain. | ||
| 520 | |a ABSTRACT: Neural mobilisations (NM) have been advocated for the treatment of nerve-related cervicobrachial pain; however, it is unclear what types of patients with nerve-related cervicobrachial pain (if any) may benefit. Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, PeDro, Cinahl, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until December 2022. Randomised controlled trials were included if they assessed the effectiveness of NM in nerve-related cervicobrachial pain, and outcome measures were pain intensity and/or disability. Studies were classified according to their inclusion/exclusion criteria as radiculopathy , Wainner cluster , Hall , and Elvey cluster or other . Meta-analyses with subgroup analyses were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Rob2 tool. Twenty-seven studies were included. For pain and disability reduction, NM was found to be more effective than no treatment (pooled pain mean difference [MD] = -2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -3.81 to -1.81; pooled disability standardized mean difference = -1.55, 95% CI = -2.72 to -0.37), increased the effectiveness of standard physiotherapy as an adjuvant when compared with standard physiotherapy alone (pooled pain MD = -1.44, 95% CI = -1.98 to -0.89; pooled disability MD = -11.07, 95% CI = -16.38 to -5.75) but was no more effective than cervical traction (pooled pain MD = -0.33, 95% CI = -1.35 to 0.68; pooled disability MD = -10.09, 95% CI = -21.89 to 1.81). For disability reduction, NM was found to be more effective than exercise (pooled MD = -18.27, 95% CI = -20.29 to -17.44). In most comparisons, there were significant differences in the effectiveness of NM between the subgroups. Neural mobilisations was consistently more effective than all alternative interventions (no treatment, traction, exercise, and standard physiotherapy alone) in 13 studies classified as Wainner cluster . PROSPERO registration: CRD42022376087 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dominguez, Laura |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Villanueva-Ruiz, Iker |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ballesteros, Javier |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rueda-Etxeberria, Mikel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rueda, Jose-Ramón |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Casado-Zumeta, Xabat |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Araolaza-Arrieta, Maialen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Arbillaga-Etxarri, Ane |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tampin, Brigitte |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Pain |d 1993 |g 165(2024), 3 vom: 01. Feb., Seite 537-549 |w (DE-627)NLM000179205 |x 1872-6623 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:165 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:01 |g month:02 |g pages:537-549 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003071 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 165 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 01 |c 02 |h 537-549 | ||