Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of baloxavir marboxil versus oseltamivir as the treatment for influenza virus infections : A systematic review and meta-analysis
Copyright © 2023 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved..
INTRODUCTION: Baloxavir marboxil (BXM), a newly developed cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor, is widely used to treat influenza virus infections in inpatients and outpatients. A previous meta-analysis included only outpatients and patients suspected of having an influenza virus infection based on clinical symptoms. However, whether BXM or oseltamivir is safer and more effective for inpatients remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis validating the effectiveness and safety of BXM versus oseltamivir in inpatients with influenza virus.
METHODS: The Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, Ichushi, and CINAHL databases were systematically searched for articles published until January 2023. The outcomes were mortality, hospitalization period, incidence of BXM- or oseltamivir-related adverse events, illness duration, and changes of virus titers and viral RNA load in patients with influenza virus infections.
RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials with 1624 outpatients and two retrospective studies with 874 inpatients were enrolled. No deaths occurred in outpatients treated with BXM or oseltamivir. Among inpatients, BXM reduced mortality (p = 0.06) and significantly shortened hospitalization period (p = 0.01) compared to oseltamivir. In outpatients, BXM had a significantly lower incidence of adverse events (p = 0.03), reductions in influenza virus titers (p < 0.001) and viral RNA loads (p < 0.001), and a tendency to be a shorter illness duration compared with that of oseltamivir (p = 0.27).
CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that BXM was safer and more effective in patients than oseltamivir; thus, supporting the use of BXM for the initial treatment of patients with proven influenza virus infection.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:30 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy - 30(2024), 3 vom: 01. Feb., Seite 242-249 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Shiraishi, Chihiro [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 14.02.2024 Date Revised 14.02.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.jiac.2023.10.017 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM363589465 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM363589465 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240214232849.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.10.017 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1292.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM363589465 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37866622 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1341-321X(23)00262-3 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Shiraishi, Chihiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of baloxavir marboxil versus oseltamivir as the treatment for influenza virus infections |b A systematic review and meta-analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 14.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 14.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a INTRODUCTION: Baloxavir marboxil (BXM), a newly developed cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor, is widely used to treat influenza virus infections in inpatients and outpatients. A previous meta-analysis included only outpatients and patients suspected of having an influenza virus infection based on clinical symptoms. However, whether BXM or oseltamivir is safer and more effective for inpatients remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis validating the effectiveness and safety of BXM versus oseltamivir in inpatients with influenza virus | ||
520 | |a METHODS: The Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, Ichushi, and CINAHL databases were systematically searched for articles published until January 2023. The outcomes were mortality, hospitalization period, incidence of BXM- or oseltamivir-related adverse events, illness duration, and changes of virus titers and viral RNA load in patients with influenza virus infections | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials with 1624 outpatients and two retrospective studies with 874 inpatients were enrolled. No deaths occurred in outpatients treated with BXM or oseltamivir. Among inpatients, BXM reduced mortality (p = 0.06) and significantly shortened hospitalization period (p = 0.01) compared to oseltamivir. In outpatients, BXM had a significantly lower incidence of adverse events (p = 0.03), reductions in influenza virus titers (p < 0.001) and viral RNA loads (p < 0.001), and a tendency to be a shorter illness duration compared with that of oseltamivir (p = 0.27) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that BXM was safer and more effective in patients than oseltamivir; thus, supporting the use of BXM for the initial treatment of patients with proven influenza virus infection | ||
650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Baloxavir marboxil | |
650 | 4 | |a Influenza virus | |
650 | 4 | |a Meta-analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Oseltamivir | |
650 | 7 | |a Oseltamivir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 20O93L6F9H |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a baloxavir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 4G86Y4JT3F |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Antiviral Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Oxazines |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Pyridines |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Thiepins |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a RNA, Viral |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Dibenzothiepins |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Morpholines |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Pyridones |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Triazines |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Kato, Hideo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hagihara, Mao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Asai, Nobuhiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Iwamoto, Takuya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mikamo, Hiroshige |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy |d 1996 |g 30(2024), 3 vom: 01. Feb., Seite 242-249 |w (DE-627)NLM095488073 |x 1437-7780 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:01 |g month:02 |g pages:242-249 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2023.10.017 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 30 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 01 |c 02 |h 242-249 |