Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats
© 2023 American College of Veterinary Surgeons..
OBJECTIVE: To compare time to construct completion and resistance to leakage for five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats and to report normal feline gastrointestinal thickness.
STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study.
SAMPLE POPULATION: Grossly normal intestinal segments (n = 120) from 10 fresh cat cadavers.
METHODS: A total of 8 cm segments of fresh feline cadaveric intestine were collected, and mural thickness was recorded. Segments were randomly allocated between a control group (n = 20 segments) and five treatment groups (20 segments/group with 2 segments/construct = 10 constructs per group): (1) hand-sewn anastomosis - simple interrupted (HSA-SI), (2) hand-sewn anastomosis - simple continuous (HSA-SC), (3) functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis (FEESA), (4) functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis with oversew (FEESA-O), (5) skin stapled anastomosis (SS). Time to construct completion, leakage location, initial leak pressure (ILP), and maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) were compared.
RESULTS: Mean mural thickness ± SD (mm) for the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were 1.66 ± 0.28, 2.05 ± 0.18, 2.28 ± 0.30, and 2.11 ± 0.39, respectively. ILPs (mean ± SD) for HSA-SI (165 ± 122 mmHg), HSA-SC (149 ± 83), FEESA-O (63 ± 25, FEESA (84 ± 59), SS (77 ± 56), and control segments (>500) were compared. There was no statistically significant difference in ILP (p > .08) or MIP (p > .084) between any treatment groups. Nonoversewn FEESAs were 2.4 times faster to perform compared to oversewn FEESA and SS groups, and 4.7 times faster than HSA (p < .001).
CONCLUSION: All anastomosis techniques provide resistance to leakage that is supraphysiological to that of the normal maximum intraluminal pressure. HSA take longer to complete than stapled anastomoses.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: All anastomotic techniques may be appropriate in cats. Hand-sewn anastomoses result in a longer surgical time.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:53 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Veterinary surgery : VS - 53(2024), 2 vom: 29. Feb., Seite 384-394 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Sanders, Jackson E [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 16.02.2024 Date Revised 15.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1111/vsu.14043 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM36339639X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM36339639X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240415232940.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/vsu.14043 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1376.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM36339639X | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37847072 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Sanders, Jackson E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 16.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 15.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2023 American College of Veterinary Surgeons. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To compare time to construct completion and resistance to leakage for five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats and to report normal feline gastrointestinal thickness | ||
520 | |a STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study | ||
520 | |a SAMPLE POPULATION: Grossly normal intestinal segments (n = 120) from 10 fresh cat cadavers | ||
520 | |a METHODS: A total of 8 cm segments of fresh feline cadaveric intestine were collected, and mural thickness was recorded. Segments were randomly allocated between a control group (n = 20 segments) and five treatment groups (20 segments/group with 2 segments/construct = 10 constructs per group): (1) hand-sewn anastomosis - simple interrupted (HSA-SI), (2) hand-sewn anastomosis - simple continuous (HSA-SC), (3) functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis (FEESA), (4) functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis with oversew (FEESA-O), (5) skin stapled anastomosis (SS). Time to construct completion, leakage location, initial leak pressure (ILP), and maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) were compared | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Mean mural thickness ± SD (mm) for the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were 1.66 ± 0.28, 2.05 ± 0.18, 2.28 ± 0.30, and 2.11 ± 0.39, respectively. ILPs (mean ± SD) for HSA-SI (165 ± 122 mmHg), HSA-SC (149 ± 83), FEESA-O (63 ± 25, FEESA (84 ± 59), SS (77 ± 56), and control segments (>500) were compared. There was no statistically significant difference in ILP (p > .08) or MIP (p > .084) between any treatment groups. Nonoversewn FEESAs were 2.4 times faster to perform compared to oversewn FEESA and SS groups, and 4.7 times faster than HSA (p < .001) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: All anastomosis techniques provide resistance to leakage that is supraphysiological to that of the normal maximum intraluminal pressure. HSA take longer to complete than stapled anastomoses | ||
520 | |a CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: All anastomotic techniques may be appropriate in cats. Hand-sewn anastomoses result in a longer surgical time | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Regier, Penny J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Waln, Monica |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Colee, James |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Veterinary surgery : VS |d 1993 |g 53(2024), 2 vom: 29. Feb., Seite 384-394 |w (DE-627)NLM013019597 |x 1532-950X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:53 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:29 |g month:02 |g pages:384-394 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14043 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 53 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 29 |c 02 |h 384-394 |