A National Survey on Coma Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Therapy in India : Revisiting the Curing Coma Campaign Come Together Survey
© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society..
BACKGROUND: The limited representation from developing countries in the original COME TOGETHER survey gave us an impetus to conduct this survey in the Indian subcontinent.
METHODS: This cross-sectional online survey was conducted from August through September 2022. Participants were health care physicians caring for patients with coma and disorders of consciousness. Fischer's exact test or the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare respondents who agreed or disagreed with the preestablished coma definition. Fleiss κ values were calculated to assess agreement among respondents. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The survey was completed by 130 physicians. We found substantial interrater agreement on absence of wakefulness (71.54%; κ = 0.71), Glasgow Coma Score ≤ 8 (78.46%; κ = 0.78), and failure to respond purposefully to visual, verbal, or tactile stimuli (66.15%; κ = 0.66). Reported common etiologies of coma included traumatic brain injury (50.76%), ischemic stroke (30%), and intracerebral hemorrhage (29.23%). The most common clinical assessment tools used for coma included the Glasgow Coma Score (92.3%) and neurological examination (60.8%). Neurological examination was the most common diagnostic tool used (100%), followed by magnetic resonance imaging (89.2%), basic laboratory studies (88.5%), and head computed tomography/angiography (86.9%). Pharmacological interventions used to stimulate arousal in patients with coma were sedation vacation (91.5%), electrolyte/endocrine correction (65.4%), osmotic therapy with mannitol (60%), hypertonic saline (54.6%), modafinil (46.9%), and antidote for drugs (45.4%). Among the nonpharmacological interventions, sensory stimulation (57.7%) was the most commonly used modality. The most common discharge disposition for comatose patients who survived hospitalization were home with or without services (70.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences from the global survey were noted regarding the following: traumatic brain injury being the most common etiology of coma in India, more frequent practice of sedation interruption, less frequent use of electroencephalography in India, rare use of pharmacological neurostimulants, and home being the most common discharge disposition in India.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2023 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Neurocritical care - (2023) vom: 11. Okt. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Mahajan, Charu [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Coma |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 11.10.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1007/s12028-023-01852-9 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM363147705 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM363147705 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226092731.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12028-023-01852-9 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1210.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM363147705 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37821721 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mahajan, Charu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A National Survey on Coma Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Therapy in India |b Revisiting the Curing Coma Campaign Come Together Survey |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 11.10.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a © 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: The limited representation from developing countries in the original COME TOGETHER survey gave us an impetus to conduct this survey in the Indian subcontinent | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: This cross-sectional online survey was conducted from August through September 2022. Participants were health care physicians caring for patients with coma and disorders of consciousness. Fischer's exact test or the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare respondents who agreed or disagreed with the preestablished coma definition. Fleiss κ values were calculated to assess agreement among respondents. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The survey was completed by 130 physicians. We found substantial interrater agreement on absence of wakefulness (71.54%; κ = 0.71), Glasgow Coma Score ≤ 8 (78.46%; κ = 0.78), and failure to respond purposefully to visual, verbal, or tactile stimuli (66.15%; κ = 0.66). Reported common etiologies of coma included traumatic brain injury (50.76%), ischemic stroke (30%), and intracerebral hemorrhage (29.23%). The most common clinical assessment tools used for coma included the Glasgow Coma Score (92.3%) and neurological examination (60.8%). Neurological examination was the most common diagnostic tool used (100%), followed by magnetic resonance imaging (89.2%), basic laboratory studies (88.5%), and head computed tomography/angiography (86.9%). Pharmacological interventions used to stimulate arousal in patients with coma were sedation vacation (91.5%), electrolyte/endocrine correction (65.4%), osmotic therapy with mannitol (60%), hypertonic saline (54.6%), modafinil (46.9%), and antidote for drugs (45.4%). Among the nonpharmacological interventions, sensory stimulation (57.7%) was the most commonly used modality. The most common discharge disposition for comatose patients who survived hospitalization were home with or without services (70.0%) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Differences from the global survey were noted regarding the following: traumatic brain injury being the most common etiology of coma in India, more frequent practice of sedation interruption, less frequent use of electroencephalography in India, rare use of pharmacological neurostimulants, and home being the most common discharge disposition in India | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Coma | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Critical care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Disorders of consciousness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Survey | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Prabhakar, Hemanshu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rass, Verena |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a McNett, Molly |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kapoor, Indu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Helbok, Raimund |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zirpe, Kapil |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a and Collaborators |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Madhavan, Gayatri L |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Prabhu, Prashanth |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sachdeva, Sohail |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yadav, Amlendu |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Malhotra, Ashima |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sikri, Himanshu |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Luthra, Ankur |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shukla, Ratnesh K |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Salhotra, Ripenmeet |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bais, Sanjiv S |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hariharan, Uma |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a N, Sivakumar M |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bharambe, Poonam V |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kapoor, Indu |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wasnik, Seema B |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chandak, Dinesh |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Moulick, Nivedita D |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Manikandan, S |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sood, Pramod |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zanwar, Varsha |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hariharan, M |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yellapu, Ramunaidu |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Herode, Deepali |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gurav, Sushma |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wanchoo, Jaya |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sharma, Shruti |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rao, Gsum |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Borah, Apurba K |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Padhi, Sudeshna |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kumar, Anil |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mahajan, Charu |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Patil, Leena A |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Karkamkar, Suhas |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Singhal, Vasudha |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khanikar, Reshu G |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Routray, Pragyan K |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nair, Shalini |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shukla, Urvi |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Malhotra, Ria V |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vaidya, Hrishikesh |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khan, Afroz |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Abhaya |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khatib, Khalid |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dixit, Subhal |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Walke, Sanjay |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rathi, Vaibhav |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ghawat, Ravindra |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dhawad, Piyush A |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bamne, Shrirang |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pote, Prajakta |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Upendra, K |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Reshma |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Navade, Jayram |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bande, Balasaheb D |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mane, Milind |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khan, Zafer A |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rathod, Yogesh |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Patil, Sudershana |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jadhav, Amol |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gare, Pravin S |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gaidhar, Achal |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meshram, Pallavi |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Makhija, Sonika V |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Masoom, Suhail S |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Padhi, Gunadhar |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Alane, Vitthal S |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yadav, Tushar |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mohanty, Anita |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kulkarni, Amol |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pingle, Rahul |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bajan, Khusrav |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Deshpande, Sudhir |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zirpe, Kapil |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kaur, Baljeet |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Singhal, Vinay |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dongre, Anand |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thakur, Ajit K |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Suryawanshi, Prasad |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nimavat, Balkrishna |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kumar, Prashant |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tiwari, Anand |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Deshmukh, Abhijeet |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shah, Jignesh |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sridhar |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sinha, Sharmili |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Borade, Sunita A |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khasne, Ruchira |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Karmarkar, Neeta |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ansari, Abdul S |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tambolkar, Ajit |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sontakke, Santosh |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dhobe, Manisha |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Javeri, Yash |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lanjewar, Prajakta |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Srinivas, S |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Varghese, Sunitha |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Juneja, Deven |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chanchalani, Gunjan |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mohanty, Tadit P |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khan, Imran |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Neurocritical care |d 2004 |g (2023) vom: 11. Okt. |w (DE-627)NLM157737888 |x 1556-0961 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2023 |g day:11 |g month:10 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-023-01852-9 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2023 |b 11 |c 10 | ||