Association of Pork Intake with Cognitive Performance in Older Adults Enrolled in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2011-2014 Data Cycles
BACKGROUND: Pork provides higher levels of several nutrients important for cognitive maintenance in older adults. A pilot clinical study suggests the addition of moderate amounts of pork to a Mediterranean-style diet improves cognition in older adults. There is an absence of observational research that isolates effects of pork from other red meats.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship of pork intake on cognitive performance in older adults.
METHODS: Cross-sectional data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2014 cycles were used in these analyses. Pork intake was assessed using data from two non-consecutive 24-h dietary recalls. Cognitive function was assessed by the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) Word Learning, CERAD Delayed Recall, Animal Fluency, and Digital Substitution tests. Statistical analyses were adjusted for sample weighting and survey design variables to account for the complex design. Student t-tests (continuous variables) and Pearson chi-squared tests (categorical variables) were employed to compare participant characteristics between the low and normal cognitive performance groups. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship of pork intake (low, medium, and high) with prevalence of low cognitive performance, with the non-consumer group as the referent category.
RESULTS: Pork intake was not beneficially or detrimentally associated performance on the any of the cognitive tests in both the crude and multivariate models (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Prospective cohort investigations and larger/longer-term clinical trials are needed to fully elucidate effects of pork intake on cognition in older adults.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:96 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD - 96(2023), 1 vom: 28., Seite 351-358 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Datlow, Lindsay Y [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Alzheimer’s disease |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 31.10.2023 Date Revised 31.10.2023 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3233/JAD-230474 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM362776571 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM362776571 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226091939.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3233/JAD-230474 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1209.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM362776571 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37781803 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Datlow, Lindsay Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Association of Pork Intake with Cognitive Performance in Older Adults Enrolled in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2011-2014 Data Cycles |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 31.10.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 31.10.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Pork provides higher levels of several nutrients important for cognitive maintenance in older adults. A pilot clinical study suggests the addition of moderate amounts of pork to a Mediterranean-style diet improves cognition in older adults. There is an absence of observational research that isolates effects of pork from other red meats | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship of pork intake on cognitive performance in older adults | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Cross-sectional data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2014 cycles were used in these analyses. Pork intake was assessed using data from two non-consecutive 24-h dietary recalls. Cognitive function was assessed by the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) Word Learning, CERAD Delayed Recall, Animal Fluency, and Digital Substitution tests. Statistical analyses were adjusted for sample weighting and survey design variables to account for the complex design. Student t-tests (continuous variables) and Pearson chi-squared tests (categorical variables) were employed to compare participant characteristics between the low and normal cognitive performance groups. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship of pork intake (low, medium, and high) with prevalence of low cognitive performance, with the non-consumer group as the referent category | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Pork intake was not beneficially or detrimentally associated performance on the any of the cognitive tests in both the crude and multivariate models (p > 0.05) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Prospective cohort investigations and larger/longer-term clinical trials are needed to fully elucidate effects of pork intake on cognition in older adults | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Alzheimer’s disease | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cognition | |
| 650 | 4 | |a nutrition surveys | |
| 650 | 4 | |a pork meat | |
| 650 | 4 | |a red meat | |
| 700 | 1 | |a King, Jay |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Leventhal, Mark |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wallace, Taylor C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD |d 1998 |g 96(2023), 1 vom: 28., Seite 351-358 |w (DE-627)NLM097527327 |x 1875-8908 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:96 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:28 |g pages:351-358 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-230474 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 96 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 28 |h 351-358 | ||