Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders by COVID-19 Status Throughout the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Copyright © 2023 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, whether performing CPR on patients with COVID-19 would be effective or increase COVID-19 transmission to health care workers was unclear.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Did the prevalence of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders by COVID-19 status change over the first year of the pandemic as risks such as COVID-19 transmission to health care workers improved?.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study assessed DNR orders for all adult patients admitted to ICUs at two academic medical centers in Chicago, IL, between April 2020 and April 2021. DNR orders by COVID-19 status were assessed using risk-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression and propensity score matching by patient severity of illness.
RESULTS: The study population of 3,070 critically ill patients were 46% Black, 53% male, with median age (interquartile range [IQR]) 63 (50-73) years. Eighteen percent were COVID-19 positive and 27% had a DNR order. Black and Latinx patients had higher absolute rates of DNR orders than White patients (30% vs 29% vs 23%; P = .006). After adjustment for patient characteristics, illness severity, and hospital location, DNR orders were more likely in patients with COVID-19 in the nonpropensity score-matched (n = 3,070; aOR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.64-2.38) and propensity score-matched (n = 1,118; aOR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.45-2.52) cohorts. The prevalence of DNR orders remained higher for patients with COVID-19 than patients without COVID-19 during all months of the study period (difference in prevalence over time, P = .751).
INTERPRETATION: In this multihospital study, DNR orders remained persistently higher for patients with COVID-19 vs patients without COVID-19 with similar severity of illness during the first year of the pandemic. The specific reasons why DNR orders remained persistently elevated for patients with COVID-19 should be assessed in future studies, because these changes may continue to affect COVID-19 patient care and outcomes.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:165 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Chest - 165(2024), 3 vom: 31. März, Seite 601-609 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Piscitello, Gina M [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 11.03.2024 Date Revised 13.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.chest.2023.09.024 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM362745730 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM362745730 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240313233650.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.chest.2023.09.024 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1326.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM362745730 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37778695 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0012-3692(23)05546-0 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Piscitello, Gina M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders by COVID-19 Status Throughout the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 11.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 13.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, whether performing CPR on patients with COVID-19 would be effective or increase COVID-19 transmission to health care workers was unclear | ||
520 | |a RESEARCH QUESTION: Did the prevalence of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders by COVID-19 status change over the first year of the pandemic as risks such as COVID-19 transmission to health care workers improved? | ||
520 | |a STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study assessed DNR orders for all adult patients admitted to ICUs at two academic medical centers in Chicago, IL, between April 2020 and April 2021. DNR orders by COVID-19 status were assessed using risk-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression and propensity score matching by patient severity of illness | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: The study population of 3,070 critically ill patients were 46% Black, 53% male, with median age (interquartile range [IQR]) 63 (50-73) years. Eighteen percent were COVID-19 positive and 27% had a DNR order. Black and Latinx patients had higher absolute rates of DNR orders than White patients (30% vs 29% vs 23%; P = .006). After adjustment for patient characteristics, illness severity, and hospital location, DNR orders were more likely in patients with COVID-19 in the nonpropensity score-matched (n = 3,070; aOR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.64-2.38) and propensity score-matched (n = 1,118; aOR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.45-2.52) cohorts. The prevalence of DNR orders remained higher for patients with COVID-19 than patients without COVID-19 during all months of the study period (difference in prevalence over time, P = .751) | ||
520 | |a INTERPRETATION: In this multihospital study, DNR orders remained persistently higher for patients with COVID-19 vs patients without COVID-19 with similar severity of illness during the first year of the pandemic. The specific reasons why DNR orders remained persistently elevated for patients with COVID-19 should be assessed in future studies, because these changes may continue to affect COVID-19 patient care and outcomes | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a do-not-resuscitate | |
650 | 4 | |a health disparities | |
700 | 1 | |a Parker, William F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Chest |d 1970 |g 165(2024), 3 vom: 31. März, Seite 601-609 |w (DE-627)NLM000002720 |x 1931-3543 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:165 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:31 |g month:03 |g pages:601-609 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2023.09.024 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 165 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 31 |c 03 |h 601-609 |