Telerehabilitation for People With Physical Disabilities and Movement Impairment : A Survey of United Kingdom Practitioners
©Sarah A Buckingham, Krithika Anil, Sara Demain, Hilary Gunn, Ray B Jones, Bridie Kent, Angela Logan, Jonathan Marsden, E Diane Playford, Jennifer Freeman. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 03.01.2022..
BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation is a feasible and potentially effective alternative to face-to-face rehabilitation. However, specific guidance, training, and support for practitioners who undertake remote assessments in people with physical disabilities and movement impairment are limited.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this survey of United Kingdom-based health and social care practitioners were to explore experiences, assess training needs, and collate ideas on best practices in telerehabilitation for physical disabilities and movement impairment. The aim will be to use the findings to inform a practical tool kit and training package for telerehabilitation use.
METHODS: UK rehabilitation practitioners were invited to complete an online questionnaire from November to December 2020. Opportunity and snowball sampling were used to recruit participants from professional and educational networks, special interest groups, and via social media. Closed questionnaire items were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative inductive analysis using NVivo was used for open responses.
RESULTS: There were 247 respondents, of which 177 (72%) were physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Most (n=207, 84%) had used video-based consultations (typically supported by telephone and email), and the use of this method had increased in frequency since the COVID-19 pandemic. Practitioners perceived telerehabilitation positively overall and recognized benefits for patients including a reduced infection risk, convenience and flexibility, and reduced travel and fatigue. Common obstacles were technology related (eg, internet connection), practical (eg, difficulty positioning the camera), patient related (eg, health status), practitioner related (eg, lack of technical skills), and organizational (eg, lack of access to technology). Support from family members or carers was a major facilitator for successful remote consultations. Of the 207 respondents who had used video-based consultations, 103 (50%) had assessed physical impairments using this method, 107 (52%) had assessed physical function, and 121 (59%) had used patient-reported outcome measures. Although practitioners generally felt confident in delivering video-based consultations, they felt less proficient in undertaking remote physical assessments, expressing concerns about validity, reliability, and safety. Only 46 of the 247 (19%) respondents had received any training in telerehabilitation or video consultations, and some felt they were "feeling their way in the dark." Practitioners desired training and guidance on physical assessment tools suitable for remote use, when to use video-based consultations or alternative methods, governance issues, digital platforms, and signposting to digital skills training for themselves and their patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, practitioners rapidly adopted telerehabilitation for people with physical disabilities and movement impairment. However, there are technical, practical, and organizational obstacles to overcome, and a clear need for improved guidance and training in remote physical assessments. The findings of this survey will inform the development of a tool kit of resources and a training package for the current and future workforce in telerehabilitation.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:3 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
JMIRx med - 3(2022), 1 vom: 03. Jan., Seite e30516 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Buckingham, Sarah A [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Health care practitioners |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 27.12.2023 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.2196/30516 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM362223548 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM362223548 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231229123856.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2196/30516 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1240.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM362223548 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37725532 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Buckingham, Sarah A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Telerehabilitation for People With Physical Disabilities and Movement Impairment |b A Survey of United Kingdom Practitioners |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 27.12.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a ©Sarah A Buckingham, Krithika Anil, Sara Demain, Hilary Gunn, Ray B Jones, Bridie Kent, Angela Logan, Jonathan Marsden, E Diane Playford, Jennifer Freeman. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 03.01.2022. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation is a feasible and potentially effective alternative to face-to-face rehabilitation. However, specific guidance, training, and support for practitioners who undertake remote assessments in people with physical disabilities and movement impairment are limited | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: The aims of this survey of United Kingdom-based health and social care practitioners were to explore experiences, assess training needs, and collate ideas on best practices in telerehabilitation for physical disabilities and movement impairment. The aim will be to use the findings to inform a practical tool kit and training package for telerehabilitation use | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: UK rehabilitation practitioners were invited to complete an online questionnaire from November to December 2020. Opportunity and snowball sampling were used to recruit participants from professional and educational networks, special interest groups, and via social media. Closed questionnaire items were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative inductive analysis using NVivo was used for open responses | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: There were 247 respondents, of which 177 (72%) were physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Most (n=207, 84%) had used video-based consultations (typically supported by telephone and email), and the use of this method had increased in frequency since the COVID-19 pandemic. Practitioners perceived telerehabilitation positively overall and recognized benefits for patients including a reduced infection risk, convenience and flexibility, and reduced travel and fatigue. Common obstacles were technology related (eg, internet connection), practical (eg, difficulty positioning the camera), patient related (eg, health status), practitioner related (eg, lack of technical skills), and organizational (eg, lack of access to technology). Support from family members or carers was a major facilitator for successful remote consultations. Of the 207 respondents who had used video-based consultations, 103 (50%) had assessed physical impairments using this method, 107 (52%) had assessed physical function, and 121 (59%) had used patient-reported outcome measures. Although practitioners generally felt confident in delivering video-based consultations, they felt less proficient in undertaking remote physical assessments, expressing concerns about validity, reliability, and safety. Only 46 of the 247 (19%) respondents had received any training in telerehabilitation or video consultations, and some felt they were "feeling their way in the dark." Practitioners desired training and guidance on physical assessment tools suitable for remote use, when to use video-based consultations or alternative methods, governance issues, digital platforms, and signposting to digital skills training for themselves and their patients | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, practitioners rapidly adopted telerehabilitation for people with physical disabilities and movement impairment. However, there are technical, practical, and organizational obstacles to overcome, and a clear need for improved guidance and training in remote physical assessments. The findings of this survey will inform the development of a tool kit of resources and a training package for the current and future workforce in telerehabilitation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a health care practitioners | |
| 650 | 4 | |a movement impairment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a occupational therapy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a physical disabilities | |
| 650 | 4 | |a physiotherapy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a rehabilitation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a remote assessments | |
| 650 | 4 | |a telehealth | |
| 650 | 4 | |a telerehabilitation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a training | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Anil, Krithika |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Demain, Sara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gunn, Hilary |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jones, Ray B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kent, Bridie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Logan, Angela |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Marsden, Jonathan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Playford, E Diane |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Freeman, Jennifer |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t JMIRx med |d 2020 |g 3(2022), 1 vom: 03. Jan., Seite e30516 |w (DE-627)NLM322679397 |x 2563-6316 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g day:03 |g month:01 |g pages:e30516 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30516 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 3 |j 2022 |e 1 |b 03 |c 01 |h e30516 | ||