Asleep-awake-asleep versus hypnosis for low-grade glioma surgery : long term follow-up outcome
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: Hypnosis-aided craniotomy is a safe alternative to standard asleep-awake-asleep (AAA) surgery in glioma surgery. The impact of these two anesthetic methods on tumor prognosis has never been assessed.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the possible impact of the type of sedation (i.e., hypnosedation vs. standard sedation) on postoperative outcomes in awake surgery for gliomas.
METHODS: Adult patients who underwent awake surgery for a diffuse glioma, excluding glioblastomas, between May 2011 and December 2019 at the authors' institution were included in the analysis. Pearson Chi-square, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for inferential analyses.
RESULTS: Sixty-one (61) patients were included, thirty-one were female (50.8 %), and the mean age was 41.8 years (SD = 11.88). Most patients had IDH mutated tumors (n = 51; 83.6%). Twenty-six patients (42.6%) were hypnosedated while 35 (57.4%) received standard AAA procedure. The overall median follow-up time was 48 months (range: 10 months-120 months). Our results did not identify any significant difference between both techniques in terms of extent of resection (sub-total resection >95% rates were 11.48% vs. 8.20%, OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 0.62-8.44; P = 0.34) and of overall survival (87.5% of patients in the AAA surgery group reach 9 years OS vs. 79% in the hypnosis cohort, cHR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.12-6.04; P = 0.87).
CONCLUSION: Hypnosis for awake craniotomy is rarely proposed although it is a suitable alternative to standard sedation in awake craniotomy for LGGs, with similar results in terms of extent of resection or survival.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:69 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Neuro-Chirurgie - 69(2023), 6 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 101494 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Bankole, Nourou Dine Adeniran [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Awake craniotomy |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 07.11.2023 Date Revised 07.11.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.neuchi.2023.101494 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM362115141 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM362115141 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226090547.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.neuchi.2023.101494 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1206.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM362115141 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37714375 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0028-3770(23)00092-9 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bankole, Nourou Dine Adeniran |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Asleep-awake-asleep versus hypnosis for low-grade glioma surgery |b long term follow-up outcome |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 07.11.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 07.11.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Hypnosis-aided craniotomy is a safe alternative to standard asleep-awake-asleep (AAA) surgery in glioma surgery. The impact of these two anesthetic methods on tumor prognosis has never been assessed | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the possible impact of the type of sedation (i.e., hypnosedation vs. standard sedation) on postoperative outcomes in awake surgery for gliomas | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Adult patients who underwent awake surgery for a diffuse glioma, excluding glioblastomas, between May 2011 and December 2019 at the authors' institution were included in the analysis. Pearson Chi-square, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for inferential analyses | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Sixty-one (61) patients were included, thirty-one were female (50.8 %), and the mean age was 41.8 years (SD = 11.88). Most patients had IDH mutated tumors (n = 51; 83.6%). Twenty-six patients (42.6%) were hypnosedated while 35 (57.4%) received standard AAA procedure. The overall median follow-up time was 48 months (range: 10 months-120 months). Our results did not identify any significant difference between both techniques in terms of extent of resection (sub-total resection >95% rates were 11.48% vs. 8.20%, OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 0.62-8.44; P = 0.34) and of overall survival (87.5% of patients in the AAA surgery group reach 9 years OS vs. 79% in the hypnosis cohort, cHR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.12-6.04; P = 0.87) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Hypnosis for awake craniotomy is rarely proposed although it is a suitable alternative to standard sedation in awake craniotomy for LGGs, with similar results in terms of extent of resection or survival | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Awake craniotomy | |
650 | 4 | |a Extent of resection | |
650 | 4 | |a Hypnosis | |
650 | 4 | |a IDH mutations | |
650 | 4 | |a Low-grade glioma | |
650 | 4 | |a Overall survival | |
650 | 4 | |a Pre-operative volume | |
700 | 1 | |a Kanmounye, Ulrick Sidney |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ouahabi, Abdessamad El |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zemmoura, Ilyess |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Neuro-Chirurgie |d 1955 |g 69(2023), 6 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 101494 |w (DE-627)NLM000278734 |x 1773-0619 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:69 |g year:2023 |g number:6 |g day:01 |g month:11 |g pages:101494 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2023.101494 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 69 |j 2023 |e 6 |b 01 |c 11 |h 101494 |