Intrauterine manipulator during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effects on oncologic outcomes of intrauterine manipulator use during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was performed by an expert librarian in multiple electronic databases from inception to January 31, 2023.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all studies in the English language that compared oncologic outcomes (recurrence-free, cause-specific, or overall survival) between endometrial cancer patients who underwent total laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer with vs without the use of an intrauterine manipulator. Studies comparing only peritoneal cytology status or lymphovascular space invasion were summarized for completeness. No selection criteria were applied to the study design.
METHODS: Four reviewers independently reviewed studies for inclusion, assessed their risk of bias, and extracted data. Pooled hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for oncologic outcomes using the random effect model. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 tests. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and Egger test.
RESULTS: Out of 350 identified references, we included 2 randomized controlled trials and 12 observational studies for a total of 14 studies and 5,019 patients. The use of an intrauterine manipulator during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer was associated with a pooled hazard ratio for recurrence of 1.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.33; P=.05; I2=31%; chi square P value=.22). Pooled hazard ratio for recurrence was 1.48 (95% confidence interval, 0.25-8.76; P=.62; I2=67%; chi square P value=.08) when only randomized controlled trials were considered. Pooled hazard ratio for overall survival was 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.76; P=0.79; I2=44%; chi square P value=.17). The rate of positive peritoneal cytology or lymphovascular space invasion did not differ using an intrauterine manipulator.
CONCLUSION: Intrauterine manipulator use during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer was neither significantly associated with recurrence-free and overall survival nor with positive peritoneal cytology or lymphovascular space invasion, but further prospective studies are needed.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:230 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology - 230(2024), 2 vom: 27. Feb., Seite 185-198.e4 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Zorzato, Pier Carlo [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 29.01.2024 Date Revised 25.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.004 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM362014663 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM362014663 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240425232348.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.004 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1386.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM362014663 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37704174 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0002-9378(23)00610-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zorzato, Pier Carlo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Intrauterine manipulator during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer |b a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 29.01.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effects on oncologic outcomes of intrauterine manipulator use during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer | ||
| 520 | |a DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was performed by an expert librarian in multiple electronic databases from inception to January 31, 2023 | ||
| 520 | |a STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all studies in the English language that compared oncologic outcomes (recurrence-free, cause-specific, or overall survival) between endometrial cancer patients who underwent total laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer with vs without the use of an intrauterine manipulator. Studies comparing only peritoneal cytology status or lymphovascular space invasion were summarized for completeness. No selection criteria were applied to the study design | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Four reviewers independently reviewed studies for inclusion, assessed their risk of bias, and extracted data. Pooled hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for oncologic outcomes using the random effect model. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 tests. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and Egger test | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Out of 350 identified references, we included 2 randomized controlled trials and 12 observational studies for a total of 14 studies and 5,019 patients. The use of an intrauterine manipulator during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer was associated with a pooled hazard ratio for recurrence of 1.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.33; P=.05; I2=31%; chi square P value=.22). Pooled hazard ratio for recurrence was 1.48 (95% confidence interval, 0.25-8.76; P=.62; I2=67%; chi square P value=.08) when only randomized controlled trials were considered. Pooled hazard ratio for overall survival was 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.76; P=0.79; I2=44%; chi square P value=.17). The rate of positive peritoneal cytology or lymphovascular space invasion did not differ using an intrauterine manipulator | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Intrauterine manipulator use during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer was neither significantly associated with recurrence-free and overall survival nor with positive peritoneal cytology or lymphovascular space invasion, but further prospective studies are needed | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a endometrial neoplasms | |
| 650 | 4 | |a hysterectomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a intrauterine manipulator | |
| 650 | 4 | |a lymphovascular space invasion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a overall survival | |
| 650 | 4 | |a peritoneal cytology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a recurrence-free survival | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Uccella, Stefano |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Biancotto, Giulia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bosco, Mariachiara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Festi, Anna |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Franchi, Massimo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Garzon, Simone |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |d 1945 |g 230(2024), 2 vom: 27. Feb., Seite 185-198.e4 |w (DE-627)NLM000012343 |x 1097-6868 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:230 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:27 |g month:02 |g pages:185-198.e4 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.004 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 230 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 27 |c 02 |h 185-198.e4 | ||