Bilateral Femoral Cannulation Is Associated With Reduced Severe Limb Ischemia-Related Complications Compared With Unilateral Femoral Cannulation in Adult Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation : Results From the Extracorporeal Life Support Registry
Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved..
OBJECTIVES: Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with femoral access is obtained through unilateral or bilateral groin cannulation. Whether one cannulation strategy is associated with a lower risk for limb ischemia remains unknown. We aim to assess if one strategy is preferable.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study based on the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry.
SETTING: ECMO centers worldwide included in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry.
PATIENTS: All adult patients (≥ 18 yr) who received peripheral venoarterial ECMO with femoral access and were included from 2014 to 2020.
INTERVENTIONS: Unilateral or bilateral femoral cannulation.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the occurrence of limb ischemia defined as a composite endpoint including the need for a distal perfusion cannula (DPC) after 6 hours from implantation, compartment syndrome/fasciotomy, amputation, revascularization, and thrombectomy. Secondary endpoints included bleeding at the peripheral cannulation site, need for vessel repair, vessel repair after decannulation, and in-hospital death. Propensity score matching was performed to account for confounders. Overall, 19,093 patients underwent peripheral venoarterial ECMO through unilateral ( n = 11,965) or bilateral ( n = 7,128) femoral cannulation. Limb ischemia requiring any intervention was not different between both groups (bilateral vs unilateral: odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82-1.02). However, there was a lower rate of compartment syndrome/fasciotomy in the bilateral group (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.97). Bilateral cannulation was also associated with lower odds of cannulation site bleeding (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.99), vessel repair (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.79), and in-hospital mortality (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.81-0.91) compared with unilateral cannulation. These findings were unchanged after propensity matching.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed no risk reduction for overall limb ischemia-related events requiring DPC after 6 hours when comparing bilateral to unilateral femoral cannulation in peripheral venoarterial ECMO. However, bilateral cannulation was associated with a reduced risk for compartment syndrome/fasciotomy, lower rates of bleeding and vessel repair during ECMO, and lower in-hospital mortality.
Errataetall: |
CommentIn: Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;52(1):153-155. - PMID 38095524 |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:52 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Critical care medicine - 52(2024), 1 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 80-91 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Simons, Jorik [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 16.12.2023 Date Revised 06.02.2024 published: Print-Electronic CommentIn: Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;52(1):153-155. - PMID 38095524 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1097/CCM.0000000000006040 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM361758316 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM361758316 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240207232037.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006040 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1283.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM361758316 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37678211 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Simons, Jorik |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Bilateral Femoral Cannulation Is Associated With Reduced Severe Limb Ischemia-Related Complications Compared With Unilateral Femoral Cannulation in Adult Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation |b Results From the Extracorporeal Life Support Registry |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 16.12.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 06.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a CommentIn: Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;52(1):153-155. - PMID 38095524 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with femoral access is obtained through unilateral or bilateral groin cannulation. Whether one cannulation strategy is associated with a lower risk for limb ischemia remains unknown. We aim to assess if one strategy is preferable | ||
520 | |a DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study based on the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry | ||
520 | |a SETTING: ECMO centers worldwide included in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry | ||
520 | |a PATIENTS: All adult patients (≥ 18 yr) who received peripheral venoarterial ECMO with femoral access and were included from 2014 to 2020 | ||
520 | |a INTERVENTIONS: Unilateral or bilateral femoral cannulation | ||
520 | |a MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the occurrence of limb ischemia defined as a composite endpoint including the need for a distal perfusion cannula (DPC) after 6 hours from implantation, compartment syndrome/fasciotomy, amputation, revascularization, and thrombectomy. Secondary endpoints included bleeding at the peripheral cannulation site, need for vessel repair, vessel repair after decannulation, and in-hospital death. Propensity score matching was performed to account for confounders. Overall, 19,093 patients underwent peripheral venoarterial ECMO through unilateral ( n = 11,965) or bilateral ( n = 7,128) femoral cannulation. Limb ischemia requiring any intervention was not different between both groups (bilateral vs unilateral: odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82-1.02). However, there was a lower rate of compartment syndrome/fasciotomy in the bilateral group (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.97). Bilateral cannulation was also associated with lower odds of cannulation site bleeding (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.99), vessel repair (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.79), and in-hospital mortality (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.81-0.91) compared with unilateral cannulation. These findings were unchanged after propensity matching | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: This study showed no risk reduction for overall limb ischemia-related events requiring DPC after 6 hours when comparing bilateral to unilateral femoral cannulation in peripheral venoarterial ECMO. However, bilateral cannulation was associated with a reduced risk for compartment syndrome/fasciotomy, lower rates of bleeding and vessel repair during ECMO, and lower in-hospital mortality | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Di Mauro, Michele |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mariani, Silvia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ravaux, Justine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a van der Horst, Iwan C C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Driessen, Rob G H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sels, Jan Willem |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Delnoij, Thijs |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Brodie, Daniel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Abrams, Darryl |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mueller, Thomas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Taccone, Fabio Silvio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Belliato, Mirko |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Broman, Mike Lars |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Malfertheiner, Maximilian V |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Boeken, Udo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fraser, John |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wiedemann, Dominik |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Belohlavek, Jan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Barrett, Nicholas A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tonna, Joseph E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pappalardo, Federico |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Barbaro, Ryan P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ramanathan, Kollengode |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a MacLaren, Graeme |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a van Mook, Walther N K A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mees, Barend |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lorusso, Roberto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Critical care medicine |d 1973 |g 52(2024), 1 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 80-91 |w (DE-627)NLM000002631 |x 1530-0293 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:52 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:01 |g month:01 |g pages:80-91 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006040 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 52 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 01 |c 01 |h 80-91 |