Erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block for postoperative pain management in thoracic surgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: The 2018 guidelines for enhanced recovery in thoracic surgery recommend paravertebral block (PVB) for postoperative pain management. However, recent studies demonstrate that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) achieves similar postoperative pain control with reduced block-related complications.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of ESPB versus PVB for pain management after thoracic surgery. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched through December 2022 (PROSPERO registration - CRD42023395593). Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, resting at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours, and at movement at 24 and 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting or block-related complications in the first 48 hours.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Ten randomized control trials enrolling a total of 624 total patients were included. There were no significant differences in pain scores, resting or at movement, at any time points except reduced resting pain scores at 12 hours with PVB (mean difference [MD]) 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.88). Opioid consumption demonstrated no significant differences at 24 hours; PVB reduced opioid consumption at 48 hours (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.89). There were no significant differences in postoperative nausea or vomiting. ESPB exhibited a nonsignificant trend toward reduced cumulative block-related complications (risk difference [RD] 0.05, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.00).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PVB, ESPB is safe and demonstrates no clinically significant differences in pain management after thoracic surgery.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:89 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Minerva anestesiologica - 89(2023), 11 vom: 20. Nov., Seite 1042-1050 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Capuano, Paolo [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Analgesics, Opioid |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 06.11.2023 Date Revised 07.11.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17510-9 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM361692080 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM361692080 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226085658.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17510-9 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1205.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM361692080 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37671541 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Capuano, Paolo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block for postoperative pain management in thoracic surgery |b a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 06.11.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 07.11.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: The 2018 guidelines for enhanced recovery in thoracic surgery recommend paravertebral block (PVB) for postoperative pain management. However, recent studies demonstrate that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) achieves similar postoperative pain control with reduced block-related complications | ||
| 520 | |a EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of ESPB versus PVB for pain management after thoracic surgery. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched through December 2022 (PROSPERO registration - CRD42023395593). Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, resting at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours, and at movement at 24 and 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting or block-related complications in the first 48 hours | ||
| 520 | |a EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Ten randomized control trials enrolling a total of 624 total patients were included. There were no significant differences in pain scores, resting or at movement, at any time points except reduced resting pain scores at 12 hours with PVB (mean difference [MD]) 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.88). Opioid consumption demonstrated no significant differences at 24 hours; PVB reduced opioid consumption at 48 hours (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.89). There were no significant differences in postoperative nausea or vomiting. ESPB exhibited a nonsignificant trend toward reduced cumulative block-related complications (risk difference [RD] 0.05, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.00) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PVB, ESPB is safe and demonstrates no clinically significant differences in pain management after thoracic surgery | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Analgesics, Opioid |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hileman, Bethany A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Martucci, Gennaro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Raffa, Giuseppe M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Toscano, Antonio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Burgio, Gaetano |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Arcadipane, Antonio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kowalewski, Mariusz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Minerva anestesiologica |d 1953 |g 89(2023), 11 vom: 20. Nov., Seite 1042-1050 |w (DE-627)NLM000043397 |x 1827-1596 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:89 |g year:2023 |g number:11 |g day:20 |g month:11 |g pages:1042-1050 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17510-9 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 89 |j 2023 |e 11 |b 20 |c 11 |h 1042-1050 | ||