Telehealth Utilization in Oral Medicine and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Objectives: The objectives of this retrospective study were to analyze telehealth utilization for two specialty care practices: oral medicine (OM) and oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) during the first 2 years of the pandemic, its impact as a new treatment modality and on participating providers, as well as identify the type of patient visit that most readily adopted telehealth. Methods: Retrospective study of patients who sought specialty services, OM and OMFS, at an outpatient clinic in a university health system setting between March 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022. Source data were obtained from Epic, an electronic medical record application. Data were graphed using Tableau and Microsoft Excel software. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing chi-squared test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: OMFS utilized telehealth 12% of the time, and OM 8% of the time. The majority (87%) of telehealth visits were for return patients (RPs). Compared with the first year of the pandemic, there was a decrease in the number of telehealth visits in the second year (p = 0.0001). As of August 2022, new patient (NP) telehealth encounters have largely returned to prepandemic levels (0-1.5%), whereas RP telehealth visits remained at an average level of 11.4% (9.4-12.4%). Surveyed providers consider telehealth as an effective complement to in-person care and will continue its use (4.2/5 Likert scale). Conclusions: Telehealth has become a viable pathway of care for OM and OMFS who previously did not utilize the remote platform to deliver healthcare. As a new treatment modality, telehealth is perceived as impactful in increasing access to specialty care by participating providers. NP visits are now almost completely in person, but telehealth continues for RPs. Ongoing demand for telehealth highlights urgency to develop appropriate standards and effective remote diagnostic/monitoring tools to maximize telehealth's capability to leverage finite health care resources and increase access to specialty care.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:30 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association - 30(2024), 3 vom: 31. März, Seite 780-787 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Miranda-Hoover, Annachristine [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Health care access |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 11.03.2024 Date Revised 11.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1089/tmj.2023.0099 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM361490283 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM361490283 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240311231858.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1089/tmj.2023.0099 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1323.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM361490283 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37651184 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Miranda-Hoover, Annachristine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Telehealth Utilization in Oral Medicine and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 11.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 11.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Objectives: The objectives of this retrospective study were to analyze telehealth utilization for two specialty care practices: oral medicine (OM) and oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) during the first 2 years of the pandemic, its impact as a new treatment modality and on participating providers, as well as identify the type of patient visit that most readily adopted telehealth. Methods: Retrospective study of patients who sought specialty services, OM and OMFS, at an outpatient clinic in a university health system setting between March 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022. Source data were obtained from Epic, an electronic medical record application. Data were graphed using Tableau and Microsoft Excel software. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing chi-squared test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: OMFS utilized telehealth 12% of the time, and OM 8% of the time. The majority (87%) of telehealth visits were for return patients (RPs). Compared with the first year of the pandemic, there was a decrease in the number of telehealth visits in the second year (p = 0.0001). As of August 2022, new patient (NP) telehealth encounters have largely returned to prepandemic levels (0-1.5%), whereas RP telehealth visits remained at an average level of 11.4% (9.4-12.4%). Surveyed providers consider telehealth as an effective complement to in-person care and will continue its use (4.2/5 Likert scale). Conclusions: Telehealth has become a viable pathway of care for OM and OMFS who previously did not utilize the remote platform to deliver healthcare. As a new treatment modality, telehealth is perceived as impactful in increasing access to specialty care by participating providers. NP visits are now almost completely in person, but telehealth continues for RPs. Ongoing demand for telehealth highlights urgency to develop appropriate standards and effective remote diagnostic/monitoring tools to maximize telehealth's capability to leverage finite health care resources and increase access to specialty care | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a health care access | |
| 650 | 4 | |a oral and maxillofacial surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a oral medicine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a specialty care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a teledentistry | |
| 650 | 4 | |a telehealth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a He, Puhan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chau, Trinh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cimba, Michael J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Francois, Kevin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Day, Saxon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shanti, Rabie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Foote, Joseph |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wilder-Smith, Petra |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Messadi, Diana V |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Le, Anh D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association |d 2000 |g 30(2024), 3 vom: 31. März, Seite 780-787 |w (DE-627)NLM110257731 |x 1556-3669 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:31 |g month:03 |g pages:780-787 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2023.0099 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 30 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 31 |c 03 |h 780-787 | ||