Despite low viral titer in saliva samples, Sanger-based SARS-CoV-2 spike gene sequencing is highly applicable for the variant identification
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature..
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the performance of Sanger-based SARS-CoV-2 spike gene sequencing and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based full-genome sequencing for variant identification in saliva samples with low viral titer.
METHODS: Using 241 stocked saliva samples collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients between November 2020 and March 2022 in Hiroshima, SARS-CoV-2 spike gene sequencing (nt22735-nt23532) was performed by nested RT-PCR and Sanger platform using in-house primers. The same samples underwent full-genome sequencing by NGS using Illumina NextSeq2000.
RESULTS: Among 241 samples, 147 were amplified by both the Sanger and the Illumina NextSeq2000 NGS, 86 by Sanger only, and 8 were not amplified at all. The overall amplification rates of Illumina NextSeq2000 NGS and Sanger were 61% and 96.7%, respectively. At low viral titer (< 103 copies/mL), Illumina NextSeq2000 NGS provided 19.2% amplification, while Sanger was 89.7% (p < 0.0001). Both platforms identified 38 wild type, 54 Alpha variants, 84 Delta variants, and 57 Omicron variants.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided evidence to expand the capacity of Sanger-based SARS-CoV-2 spike gene sequencing for variants identification over full-genome by Illumina NextSeq2000 NGS for mass screening. Therefore, the feasible and simple Sanger-based SARS-CoV-2 spike gene sequencing is practical for the initial variants screening, which might reduce the gap between the rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 and its molecular surveillance.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:16 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
BMC medical genomics - 16(2023), 1 vom: 24. Aug., Seite 199 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Ko, Ko [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Amplification |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.08.2023 Date Revised 21.11.2023 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1186/s12920-023-01633-5 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM36119143X |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM36119143X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226084618.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12920-023-01633-5 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1203.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM36119143X | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37620887 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ko, Ko |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Despite low viral titer in saliva samples, Sanger-based SARS-CoV-2 spike gene sequencing is highly applicable for the variant identification |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 28.08.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 21.11.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the performance of Sanger-based SARS-CoV-2 spike gene sequencing and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based full-genome sequencing for variant identification in saliva samples with low viral titer | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Using 241 stocked saliva samples collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients between November 2020 and March 2022 in Hiroshima, SARS-CoV-2 spike gene sequencing (nt22735-nt23532) was performed by nested RT-PCR and Sanger platform using in-house primers. The same samples underwent full-genome sequencing by NGS using Illumina NextSeq2000 | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Among 241 samples, 147 were amplified by both the Sanger and the Illumina NextSeq2000 NGS, 86 by Sanger only, and 8 were not amplified at all. The overall amplification rates of Illumina NextSeq2000 NGS and Sanger were 61% and 96.7%, respectively. At low viral titer (< 103 copies/mL), Illumina NextSeq2000 NGS provided 19.2% amplification, while Sanger was 89.7% (p < 0.0001). Both platforms identified 38 wild type, 54 Alpha variants, 84 Delta variants, and 57 Omicron variants | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided evidence to expand the capacity of Sanger-based SARS-CoV-2 spike gene sequencing for variants identification over full-genome by Illumina NextSeq2000 NGS for mass screening. Therefore, the feasible and simple Sanger-based SARS-CoV-2 spike gene sequencing is practical for the initial variants screening, which might reduce the gap between the rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 and its molecular surveillance | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a Amplification | |
650 | 4 | |a Japan | |
650 | 4 | |a Next generation sequencing | |
650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV-2 | |
650 | 4 | |a Sanger method | |
650 | 4 | |a Screening | |
650 | 4 | |a Variants | |
700 | 1 | |a Takahashi, Kazuaki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ito, Noriaki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sugiyama, Aya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nagashima, Shintaro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Miwata, Kei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kitahara, Yoshihiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Okimoto, Mafumi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ouoba, Serge |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Akuffo, Golda Ataa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a E, Bunthen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Akita, Tomoyuki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Takafuta, Toshiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tanaka, Junko |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC medical genomics |d 2008 |g 16(2023), 1 vom: 24. Aug., Seite 199 |w (DE-627)NLM177260793 |x 1755-8794 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:24 |g month:08 |g pages:199 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-023-01633-5 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 16 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 24 |c 08 |h 199 |