A Single-Institution 5-Year Retrospective Analysis of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Staple-Line Reinforcement : Bioabsorbable Mesh Versus Oversewing
Background: Staple-line reinforcement has been used to decrease complications such as staple-line bleeding (SLB) and staple-line leaks (SLLs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). There is little data comparing bioabsorbable mesh reinforcement (BMR) with oversewing the staple line (OSL). The aim of our study was to compare BMR with OSL in SG. Materials and Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective analysis comparing risks and benefits of BMR (group a) with those of OSL (group b) for SG staple-line reinforcement between 2015 and 2020. Results: In total, 857 patients were identified. There were 452 (52.74%) in group a and 405 (47.26%) in group b. SLB requiring transfusion occurred in 6 (1.32%) patients in group a and 6 (1.48%) patients in group b, NS (P = .848). Zero SLL was identified in either group. One-year mean direct cost of SG in group a was $7881 compared with $6677 in group b. Conclusion: This retrospective study showed that there was low risk of bleeding or leak with either technique of staple-line reinforcement and there was no significant difference in SLB or leak rate with bioabsorbable mesh versus oversewing. The use of bioabsorbable mesh was more expensive than oversewing.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:33 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A - 33(2023), 10 vom: 24. Okt., Seite 963-968 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
St Pierre, Jesse [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Bariatrics |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 05.10.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1089/lap.2022.0551 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM36113911X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM36113911X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226084517.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1089/lap.2022.0551 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1203.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM36113911X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37615525 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a St Pierre, Jesse |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Single-Institution 5-Year Retrospective Analysis of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Staple-Line Reinforcement |b Bioabsorbable Mesh Versus Oversewing |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 05.10.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a Background: Staple-line reinforcement has been used to decrease complications such as staple-line bleeding (SLB) and staple-line leaks (SLLs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). There is little data comparing bioabsorbable mesh reinforcement (BMR) with oversewing the staple line (OSL). The aim of our study was to compare BMR with OSL in SG. Materials and Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective analysis comparing risks and benefits of BMR (group a) with those of OSL (group b) for SG staple-line reinforcement between 2015 and 2020. Results: In total, 857 patients were identified. There were 452 (52.74%) in group a and 405 (47.26%) in group b. SLB requiring transfusion occurred in 6 (1.32%) patients in group a and 6 (1.48%) patients in group b, NS (P = .848). Zero SLL was identified in either group. One-year mean direct cost of SG in group a was $7881 compared with $6677 in group b. Conclusion: This retrospective study showed that there was low risk of bleeding or leak with either technique of staple-line reinforcement and there was no significant difference in SLB or leak rate with bioabsorbable mesh versus oversewing. The use of bioabsorbable mesh was more expensive than oversewing | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bariatrics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a laparoscopic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a sleeve gastrectomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a staple-line reinforcement | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hajebian, H Harvak |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Velasco, Cruz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wooldridge, James |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gorham, Jessica |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Richardson, William S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A |d 1998 |g 33(2023), 10 vom: 24. Okt., Seite 963-968 |w (DE-627)NLM093911696 |x 1557-9034 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2023 |g number:10 |g day:24 |g month:10 |g pages:963-968 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lap.2022.0551 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 33 |j 2023 |e 10 |b 24 |c 10 |h 963-968 | ||