Effects of Unity Prosthetic Elevated Vacuum Suspension System on Minimum Swing Toe Clearance
Copyright (c) 2022 Gholizadeh H, Lemaire E.D, Nantel J..
BACKGROUND: The risk of tripping in people with amputation is greater than that of able-bodied individuals due to reduced toe clearance during the swing phase. Appropriate prosthetic suspension may increase toe clearance by providing more secured attachment between the residual limb and prosthetic socket. Research is lacking on the Unity suspension system's effect on swing toe clearance.
METHODS: Twelve people with transtibial amputation were fitted with the Unity suspension system. After one month accommodation period, the person walked with active (ON) or inactive vacuum (OFF) in a CAREN-Extended virtual reality system, across multiple simulated real-world scenarios. Prosthetics minimum swing toe clearance, and kinematic data, while the vacuum was ON or OFF, were compared with the intact side and a group of 12 able-bodied individuals.
RESULTS: Minimum swing toe clearance (MSTC) and knee flexion angle were larger on the prosthetic side (active and inactive vacuum) compared to both the intact side and the control group. However, hip flexion angle on the prosthetic side was approximately 17% smaller than the control group. Unlike the control group, MSTC with active and inactive vacuum suspension was not significantly different between level walking and other walking conditions. Finally, among all walking conditions, the lowest swing toe clearance for both control and the amputee groups was recorded when the limb was at the top of a side-slope.
CONCLUSION: An effective suspension system could improve toe clearance; however, significant differences were not found between active and inactive vacuum conditions. The likelihood of inappropriate foot contact on side-slope ground might be greater than other walking conditions for both able-bodied and amputee groups, possibly leading to stumbling or falling.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:5 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal - 5(2022), 1 vom: 01., Seite 36847 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Gholizadeh, H [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Amputation |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 25.08.2023 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36847 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM361128819 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM361128819 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226084504.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36847 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1203.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM361128819 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37614477 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gholizadeh, H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effects of Unity Prosthetic Elevated Vacuum Suspension System on Minimum Swing Toe Clearance |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.08.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright (c) 2022 Gholizadeh H, Lemaire E.D, Nantel J. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: The risk of tripping in people with amputation is greater than that of able-bodied individuals due to reduced toe clearance during the swing phase. Appropriate prosthetic suspension may increase toe clearance by providing more secured attachment between the residual limb and prosthetic socket. Research is lacking on the Unity suspension system's effect on swing toe clearance | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Twelve people with transtibial amputation were fitted with the Unity suspension system. After one month accommodation period, the person walked with active (ON) or inactive vacuum (OFF) in a CAREN-Extended virtual reality system, across multiple simulated real-world scenarios. Prosthetics minimum swing toe clearance, and kinematic data, while the vacuum was ON or OFF, were compared with the intact side and a group of 12 able-bodied individuals | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Minimum swing toe clearance (MSTC) and knee flexion angle were larger on the prosthetic side (active and inactive vacuum) compared to both the intact side and the control group. However, hip flexion angle on the prosthetic side was approximately 17% smaller than the control group. Unlike the control group, MSTC with active and inactive vacuum suspension was not significantly different between level walking and other walking conditions. Finally, among all walking conditions, the lowest swing toe clearance for both control and the amputee groups was recorded when the limb was at the top of a side-slope | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: An effective suspension system could improve toe clearance; however, significant differences were not found between active and inactive vacuum conditions. The likelihood of inappropriate foot contact on side-slope ground might be greater than other walking conditions for both able-bodied and amputee groups, possibly leading to stumbling or falling | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Amputation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gait | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Lower Limb Amputation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mobility | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Prosthesis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Prosthetic Suspension | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rehabilitation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Toe Clearance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Transtibial Prosthesis | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lemaire, E D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nantel, J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal |d 2019 |g 5(2022), 1 vom: 01., Seite 36847 |w (DE-627)NLM361128053 |x 2561-987X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g day:01 |g pages:36847 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36847 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 5 |j 2022 |e 1 |b 01 |h 36847 | ||