Economic evaluation of self-help group interventions for health in LMICs : a scoping review

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine..

This scoping review aims to identify and critically appraise published economic evaluations of self-help group (SHG) interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) that seek to improve health and potentially also non-health outcomes. Through a systematic search of MEDLINE ALL (Ovid), EMBASE Ovid, PsychINFO, EconLit (Ovid) and Global Index Medicus, we identified studies published between 2014 and 2020 that were based in LMICs, included at least a health outcome, estimated intervention costs and reported the methods used. We critically analysed whether the methods employed can meaningfully inform decisions by ministries of health and other sectors, including donors, regarding whether to fund such interventions, and prioritized the aspects of evaluations that support decision-making and cross-sectoral decision-making especially. Nine studies met our inclusion criteria. Randomized controlled trials were the most commonly used vehicle to collect data and to establish a causal effect across studies. While all studies clearly stated one or more perspectives justifying the costs and effects that are reported, few papers clearly laid out the decision context or the decision maker(s) informed by the study. The latter is required to inform which costs, effects and opportunity costs are relevant to the decision and should be included in the analysis. Costs were typically reported from the provider or health-care sector perspective although other perspectives were also employed. Four papers reported outcomes in terms of a generic measure of health. Contrary to expectation, no studies reported outcomes beyond health. Our findings suggest limitations in the extent to which published studies are able to inform decision makers around the value of implementing SHG interventions in their particular context. Funders can make better informed decisions when evidence is presented using a cross-sectoral framework.

Medienart:	E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:	2023
Erschienen:	2023

Enthalten in:	Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:38
Enthalten in:	Health policy and planning - 38(2023), 9 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1033-1049

Sprache:	Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:	Ochalek, Jessica [VerfasserIn] Gibbs, Naomi K [VerfasserIn] Faria, Rita [VerfasserIn] Darlong, Joydeepa [VerfasserIn] Govindasamy, Karthikeyan [VerfasserIn] Harden, Melissa [VerfasserIn] Meka, Anthony [VerfasserIn] Shrestha, Dilip [VerfasserIn] Napit, Indra Bahadur [VerfasserIn] Lilford, Richard J [VerfasserIn] Sculpher, Mark [VerfasserIn]

Links:	Volltext

Themen:	Cost-effectiveness analysis review Journal Article Self-help group

Anmerkungen:	Date Revised 13.10.2023 published: Print Citation Status Publisher

doi:	10.1093/heapol/czad060

funding:
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):	NLM360982069