Performance of Fracture Risk Assessment Tools by Race and Ethnicity : A Systematic Review for the ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA..
The American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) Professional Practice Committee charged an ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk to review the evidence on whether current approaches for differentiating fracture risk based on race and ethnicity are necessary and valid. To help address these charges, we performed a systematic literature review investigating performance of calculators for predicting incident fractures within and across race and ethnicity groups in middle-aged and older US adults. We included English-language, controlled or prospective cohort studies that enrolled US adults aged >40 years and reported tool performance predicting incident fractures within individual race and ethnicity groups for up to 10 years. From 4838 identified references, six reports met eligibility criteria, all in women. Just three, all from one study, included results in non-white individuals. In these three reports, non-white women experienced relatively few major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs), especially hip fractures, and risk thresholds for predicting fractures in non-white women were derived from risks in the overall, predominantly white study population. One report suggested the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) without bone mineral density (BMD) overestimated hip fracture similarly across race and ethnicity groups (black, Hispanic, American Indian, Asian, white) but overestimated MOF more in non-white than White women. However, these three reports were inconclusive regarding whether discrimination of FRAX or the Garvan calculator without BMD or of FRAX with BMD for MOF or hip fracture differed between white versus black women. This uncertainty was at least partly due to imprecise hip fracture estimates in black women. No reports examined whether ratios of observed to predicted hip fracture risks within each race or ethnicity group varied across levels of predicted hip fracture risk. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:38 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research - 38(2023), 12 vom: 19. Dez., Seite 1731-1741 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Fink, Howard A [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
CALCULATOR |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.12.2023 Date Revised 11.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1002/jbmr.4895 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM360959989 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM360959989 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240411232105.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/jbmr.4895 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1372.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM360959989 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37597237 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fink, Howard A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Performance of Fracture Risk Assessment Tools by Race and Ethnicity |b A Systematic Review for the ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 28.12.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 11.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. | ||
| 520 | |a The American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) Professional Practice Committee charged an ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk to review the evidence on whether current approaches for differentiating fracture risk based on race and ethnicity are necessary and valid. To help address these charges, we performed a systematic literature review investigating performance of calculators for predicting incident fractures within and across race and ethnicity groups in middle-aged and older US adults. We included English-language, controlled or prospective cohort studies that enrolled US adults aged >40 years and reported tool performance predicting incident fractures within individual race and ethnicity groups for up to 10 years. From 4838 identified references, six reports met eligibility criteria, all in women. Just three, all from one study, included results in non-white individuals. In these three reports, non-white women experienced relatively few major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs), especially hip fractures, and risk thresholds for predicting fractures in non-white women were derived from risks in the overall, predominantly white study population. One report suggested the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) without bone mineral density (BMD) overestimated hip fracture similarly across race and ethnicity groups (black, Hispanic, American Indian, Asian, white) but overestimated MOF more in non-white than White women. However, these three reports were inconclusive regarding whether discrimination of FRAX or the Garvan calculator without BMD or of FRAX with BMD for MOF or hip fracture differed between white versus black women. This uncertainty was at least partly due to imprecise hip fracture estimates in black women. No reports examined whether ratios of observed to predicted hip fracture risks within each race or ethnicity group varied across levels of predicted hip fracture risk. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a CALCULATOR | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ETHNIC GROUPS | |
| 650 | 4 | |a FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT | |
| 650 | 4 | |a HUMAN | |
| 650 | 4 | |a RACE FACTORS | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Minerals |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Butler, Mary E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Claussen, Amy M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Collins, Erin S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Krohn, Kristina M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Taylor, Brent C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tikabo, Sina S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vang, Denny |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zerzan, Nicholas L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ensrud, Kristine E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research |d 1991 |g 38(2023), 12 vom: 19. Dez., Seite 1731-1741 |w (DE-627)NLM012611115 |x 1523-4681 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2023 |g number:12 |g day:19 |g month:12 |g pages:1731-1741 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4895 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 38 |j 2023 |e 12 |b 19 |c 12 |h 1731-1741 | ||