Comparison of clinical outcomes of osimertinib and first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in TKI-untreated EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastases
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are devastating complications of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has better penetration into the central nervous system than first-generation EGFR-TKIs, data on the distinct activity of EGFR-TKIs in untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM are lacking.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with EGFR-TKIs for TKI-untreated common EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM between July 2002 and July 2021 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: patients treated with osimertinib (Osi group) and those treated with gefitinib or erlotinib [first-generation (1G)-TKI group].
RESULTS: Of the 967 patients, 71 were eligible, including 29 in the Osi group and 42 in the 1G-TKI group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the Osi group were better than those in the 1G-TKI group (PFS: 16.9 months versus 8.6 months, P = 0.007, and OS: 26.6 months versus 20.0 months, P = 0.158). The LM-overall response rate (ORR) and LM-PFS were significantly better in the Osi group than in the 1G-TKI group (LM-ORR: 62.5% versus 25.7%, P = 0.007; LM-PFS: 23.4 months versus 12.1 months, P = 0.021). In the subgroup analysis of EGFR mutation status, LM-PFS for patients with exon 19 deletion was significantly longer in the Osi group than in the 1G-TKI group (32.7 months versus 13.4 months, P = 0.013), whereas those with L858R mutation in exon 21 did not differ between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, osimertinib and exon 19 deletion were significant factors for better LM-PFS and OS.
CONCLUSION: Osimertinib can be more effective for untreated common EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with LM, especially those with exon 19 deletion, compared to first-generation TKIs.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:8 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
ESMO open - 8(2023), 4 vom: 15. Aug., Seite 101594 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Tamura, K [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 30.08.2023 Date Revised 13.12.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101594 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM36017227X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM36017227X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231227131428.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101594 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1225.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM36017227X | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37517364 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S2059-7029(23)00828-1 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Tamura, K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of clinical outcomes of osimertinib and first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in TKI-untreated EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastases |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 30.08.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 13.12.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are devastating complications of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has better penetration into the central nervous system than first-generation EGFR-TKIs, data on the distinct activity of EGFR-TKIs in untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM are lacking | ||
520 | |a PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with EGFR-TKIs for TKI-untreated common EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM between July 2002 and July 2021 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: patients treated with osimertinib (Osi group) and those treated with gefitinib or erlotinib [first-generation (1G)-TKI group] | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Of the 967 patients, 71 were eligible, including 29 in the Osi group and 42 in the 1G-TKI group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the Osi group were better than those in the 1G-TKI group (PFS: 16.9 months versus 8.6 months, P = 0.007, and OS: 26.6 months versus 20.0 months, P = 0.158). The LM-overall response rate (ORR) and LM-PFS were significantly better in the Osi group than in the 1G-TKI group (LM-ORR: 62.5% versus 25.7%, P = 0.007; LM-PFS: 23.4 months versus 12.1 months, P = 0.021). In the subgroup analysis of EGFR mutation status, LM-PFS for patients with exon 19 deletion was significantly longer in the Osi group than in the 1G-TKI group (32.7 months versus 13.4 months, P = 0.013), whereas those with L858R mutation in exon 21 did not differ between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, osimertinib and exon 19 deletion were significant factors for better LM-PFS and OS | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Osimertinib can be more effective for untreated common EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with LM, especially those with exon 19 deletion, compared to first-generation TKIs | ||
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a erlotinib | |
650 | 4 | |a gefitinib | |
650 | 4 | |a leptomeningeal metastases | |
650 | 4 | |a non-small-cell lung cancer | |
650 | 4 | |a osimertinib | |
650 | 7 | |a EGFR protein, human |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a EC 2.7.10.1 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a ErbB Receptors |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a EC 2.7.10.1 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a osimertinib |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 3C06JJ0Z2O |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Protein Kinase Inhibitors |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Yoshida, T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Masuda, K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Matsumoto, Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Shinno, Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Okuma, Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Goto, Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Horinouchi, H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yamamoto, N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ohe, Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t ESMO open |d 2016 |g 8(2023), 4 vom: 15. Aug., Seite 101594 |w (DE-627)NLM266189539 |x 2059-7029 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g day:15 |g month:08 |g pages:101594 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101594 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 8 |j 2023 |e 4 |b 15 |c 08 |h 101594 |