Prediction of Mortality and Morbidity After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury : A Comparison Between Rotterdam and Richmond Computed Tomography Scan Scoring System
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVE: Accurate prediction of the morbidity and mortality outcomes of traumatic brain injury patients is still challenging. In the present study, we aimed to compare the predictive value of the Richmond and Rotterdam scoring systems as two novel computed tomography-based predictive models.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1400 subjects who suffered from severe traumatic brain injury and were admitted to Emtiaz Hospital, a tertiary referral trauma center in Shiraz, south of Iran, from January 2018 to December 2019. We evaluated the 1-month results; considering two primary factors: mortality and morbidity. The patients' condition was the basis for this assessment. We conducted a logistic regression analysis to determine the association between scoring systems and outcomes. To determine the optimal threshold value, we utilized the receiver operating characteristic curve model.
RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 36.61 ± 17.58 years, respectively. Concerning predicting the mortality rate, the area under the curve (AUC) for the Rotterdam score was relatively low 0.64 (95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.67), while the Richmond score had a higher AUC 0.74 (0.71-0.77), which demonstrated the superiority of this scoring system. Moreover, the Richmond score was more accurate for predicting 1-month morbidity with AUC: 0.71 (0.69, 0.74) versus 0.62 (0.59, 0.65).
CONCLUSIONS: The Richmond scoring system demonstrated more accurate predictions for the present outcomes. The simplicity and predictive value of the Richmond score make this system an ideal option for use in emergency settings and centers with high patient loads.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:178 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
World neurosurgery - 178(2023) vom: 21. Okt., Seite e371-e381 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Habibzadeh, Adrina [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Head CT scan |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 09.10.2023 Date Revised 18.10.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.076 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM359823300 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM359823300 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226081711.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.076 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1199.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM359823300 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37482083 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S1878-8750(23)01017-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Habibzadeh, Adrina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prediction of Mortality and Morbidity After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury |b A Comparison Between Rotterdam and Richmond Computed Tomography Scan Scoring System |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 09.10.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 18.10.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: Accurate prediction of the morbidity and mortality outcomes of traumatic brain injury patients is still challenging. In the present study, we aimed to compare the predictive value of the Richmond and Rotterdam scoring systems as two novel computed tomography-based predictive models | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1400 subjects who suffered from severe traumatic brain injury and were admitted to Emtiaz Hospital, a tertiary referral trauma center in Shiraz, south of Iran, from January 2018 to December 2019. We evaluated the 1-month results; considering two primary factors: mortality and morbidity. The patients' condition was the basis for this assessment. We conducted a logistic regression analysis to determine the association between scoring systems and outcomes. To determine the optimal threshold value, we utilized the receiver operating characteristic curve model | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 36.61 ± 17.58 years, respectively. Concerning predicting the mortality rate, the area under the curve (AUC) for the Rotterdam score was relatively low 0.64 (95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.67), while the Richmond score had a higher AUC 0.74 (0.71-0.77), which demonstrated the superiority of this scoring system. Moreover, the Richmond score was more accurate for predicting 1-month morbidity with AUC: 0.71 (0.69, 0.74) versus 0.62 (0.59, 0.65) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: The Richmond scoring system demonstrated more accurate predictions for the present outcomes. The simplicity and predictive value of the Richmond score make this system an ideal option for use in emergency settings and centers with high patient loads | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Head CT scan | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Prognostic models | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Richmond scores | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rotterdam score | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Traumatic brain injury | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Andishgar, Aref |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kardeh, Sina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Keshavarzian, Omid |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Taheri, Reza |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tabrizi, Reza |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Keshavarz, Pedram |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t World neurosurgery |d 2010 |g 178(2023) vom: 21. Okt., Seite e371-e381 |w (DE-627)NLM197924441 |x 1878-8769 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:178 |g year:2023 |g day:21 |g month:10 |g pages:e371-e381 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.076 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 178 |j 2023 |b 21 |c 10 |h e371-e381 | ||