Prophylaxis for paediatric emergence delirium in desflurane-based anaesthesia : a network meta-analysis
© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists..
PURPOSE: The prevalence of postoperative emergence delirium in paediatric patients (pedED) following desflurane anaesthesia is considerably high at 50-80%. Although several pharmacological prophylactic strategies have been introduced to reduce the risk of pedED, conclusive evidence about the superiority of these individual regimens is lacking. The aim of the current study was to assess the potential prophylactic effect and safety of individual pharmacotherapies in the prevention of pedED following desflurane anaesthesia.
METHODS: This frequentist model network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included peer-reviewed RCTs of either placebo-controlled or active-controlled design in paediatric patients under desflurane anaesthesia.
RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 573 participants were included. Overall, the ketamine + propofol administration [odds ratio (OR) = 0.05, 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) 0.01-0.33], dexmedetomidine alone (OR = 0.13, 95%CIs 0.05-0.31), and propofol administration (OR = 0.30, 95%CIs 0.10-0.91) were associated with a significantly lower incidence of pedED than the placebo/control groups. In addition, only gabapentin and dexmedetomidine were associated with a significantly higher improvement in the severity of emergence delirium than the placebo/control groups. Finally, the ketamine + propofol administration was associated with the lowest incidence of pedED, whereas gabapentin was associated with the lowest severity of pedED among all of the pharmacologic interventions studied.
CONCLUSIONS: The current NMA showed that ketamine + propofol administration was associated with the lowest incidence of pedED among all of the pharmacologic interventions studied. Future large-scale trials to more fully elucidate the comparative benefits of different combination regimens are warranted.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021285200.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:38 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of anesthesia - 38(2024), 2 vom: 05. März, Seite 155-166 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Kuo, Hung-Chang [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 21.03.2024 Date Revised 21.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s00540-023-03219-y |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM359066607 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM359066607 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240321235308.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00540-023-03219-y |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1338.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM359066607 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37405496 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kuo, Hung-Chang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prophylaxis for paediatric emergence delirium in desflurane-based anaesthesia |b a network meta-analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 21.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 21.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. | ||
520 | |a PURPOSE: The prevalence of postoperative emergence delirium in paediatric patients (pedED) following desflurane anaesthesia is considerably high at 50-80%. Although several pharmacological prophylactic strategies have been introduced to reduce the risk of pedED, conclusive evidence about the superiority of these individual regimens is lacking. The aim of the current study was to assess the potential prophylactic effect and safety of individual pharmacotherapies in the prevention of pedED following desflurane anaesthesia | ||
520 | |a METHODS: This frequentist model network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included peer-reviewed RCTs of either placebo-controlled or active-controlled design in paediatric patients under desflurane anaesthesia | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 573 participants were included. Overall, the ketamine + propofol administration [odds ratio (OR) = 0.05, 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) 0.01-0.33], dexmedetomidine alone (OR = 0.13, 95%CIs 0.05-0.31), and propofol administration (OR = 0.30, 95%CIs 0.10-0.91) were associated with a significantly lower incidence of pedED than the placebo/control groups. In addition, only gabapentin and dexmedetomidine were associated with a significantly higher improvement in the severity of emergence delirium than the placebo/control groups. Finally, the ketamine + propofol administration was associated with the lowest incidence of pedED, whereas gabapentin was associated with the lowest severity of pedED among all of the pharmacologic interventions studied | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: The current NMA showed that ketamine + propofol administration was associated with the lowest incidence of pedED among all of the pharmacologic interventions studied. Future large-scale trials to more fully elucidate the comparative benefits of different combination regimens are warranted | ||
520 | |a TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021285200 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Desflurane | |
650 | 4 | |a Emergence agitation | |
650 | 4 | |a Emergence delirium | |
650 | 4 | |a Network meta-analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Pediatric anesthesia | |
650 | 7 | |a Propofol |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a YI7VU623SF |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Desflurane |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a CRS35BZ94Q |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Anesthetics, Inhalation |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Dexmedetomidine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 67VB76HONO |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Gabapentin |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 6CW7F3G59X |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ketamine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 690G0D6V8H |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Hung, Kuo-Chuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Hung-Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zeng, Bing-Syuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Tien-Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Dian-Jeng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lin, Pao-Yen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Su, Kuan-Pin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chiang, Min-Hsien |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Carvalho, Andre F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Stubbs, Brendon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tu, Yu-Kang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wu, Yi-Cheng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Roerecke, Michael |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Smith, Lee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hsu, Shih-Pin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Yen-Wen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yeh, Pin-Yang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hsu, Chih-Wei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Suen, Mein-Woei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tseng, Ping-Tao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of anesthesia |d 1987 |g 38(2024), 2 vom: 05. März, Seite 155-166 |w (DE-627)NLM088729141 |x 1438-8359 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:05 |g month:03 |g pages:155-166 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03219-y |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 38 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 05 |c 03 |h 155-166 |