Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis of Patient Preferences for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI as Supplemental Screening Options for Breast Cancer
Copyright © 2023 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVE: To guide implementation of supplemental breast screening by assessing patient preferences for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methodology.
METHODS: In an institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant protocol, from March 23 to June 3, 2022, we contacted 579 women who had both CEM screening and MRI. Women were e-mailed an invitation to complete an online survey developed using an AHP-based model to elicit preferences for CEM or MRI. Methods for categorical data analysis were used to evaluate factors affecting preferences, under the Bonferroni correction for multiplicity.
RESULTS: Complete responses were received from 222 (38.3%) women; the 189 women with a personal history of breast cancer had a mean age 61.8 years, and the 34 women without a personal history of breast cancer had a mean age of 53.6 years. Of 222 respondents, 157 (70.7%, confidence interval [CI]: 64.7-76.7) were determined to prefer CEM to MRI. Breast positioning was the most important criterion for 74 of 222 (33.3%) respondents, with claustrophobia, intravenous line placement, and overall stress most important for 38, 37, and 39 women (17.1%, 16.7%, and 17.6%), respectively, and noise level, contrast injection, and indifference being emphasized least frequently (by 10 [4.5%], 11 [5.0%], and 13 [5.9%] women, respectively). CEM preference was most prevalent (MRI least prevalent) for respondents emphasizing claustrophobia (37 of 38 [97%], CI: 86.2-99.9); CEM preference was least prevalent (MRI most prevalent) for respondents emphasizing breast positioning (40 of 74 [54%], CI: 42.1-65.7).
CONCLUSIONS: AHP-based modeling reveals strong patient preferences for CEM over MRI, with claustrophobia favoring preference for CEM and breast positioning relatively favoring preference for MRI. Our results should help guide implementation of screening CEM and MRI.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:20 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR - 20(2023), 8 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 758-768 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Berg, Wendie A [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 04.09.2023 Date Revised 05.09.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.jacr.2023.05.014 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM358953111 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM358953111 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226075833.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.05.014 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1196.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM358953111 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37394083 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S1546-1440(23)00421-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Berg, Wendie A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis of Patient Preferences for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI as Supplemental Screening Options for Breast Cancer |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 04.09.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 05.09.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2023 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To guide implementation of supplemental breast screening by assessing patient preferences for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methodology | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: In an institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant protocol, from March 23 to June 3, 2022, we contacted 579 women who had both CEM screening and MRI. Women were e-mailed an invitation to complete an online survey developed using an AHP-based model to elicit preferences for CEM or MRI. Methods for categorical data analysis were used to evaluate factors affecting preferences, under the Bonferroni correction for multiplicity | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Complete responses were received from 222 (38.3%) women; the 189 women with a personal history of breast cancer had a mean age 61.8 years, and the 34 women without a personal history of breast cancer had a mean age of 53.6 years. Of 222 respondents, 157 (70.7%, confidence interval [CI]: 64.7-76.7) were determined to prefer CEM to MRI. Breast positioning was the most important criterion for 74 of 222 (33.3%) respondents, with claustrophobia, intravenous line placement, and overall stress most important for 38, 37, and 39 women (17.1%, 16.7%, and 17.6%), respectively, and noise level, contrast injection, and indifference being emphasized least frequently (by 10 [4.5%], 11 [5.0%], and 13 [5.9%] women, respectively). CEM preference was most prevalent (MRI least prevalent) for respondents emphasizing claustrophobia (37 of 38 [97%], CI: 86.2-99.9); CEM preference was least prevalent (MRI most prevalent) for respondents emphasizing breast positioning (40 of 74 [54%], CI: 42.1-65.7) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: AHP-based modeling reveals strong patient preferences for CEM over MRI, with claustrophobia favoring preference for CEM and breast positioning relatively favoring preference for MRI. Our results should help guide implementation of screening CEM and MRI | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a MRI | |
| 650 | 4 | |a breast cancer screening | |
| 650 | 4 | |a contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a patient preferences | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Contrast Media |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bandos, Andriy I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sava, M Gabriela |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR |d 2004 |g 20(2023), 8 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 758-768 |w (DE-627)NLM167902083 |x 1558-349X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2023 |g number:8 |g day:20 |g month:08 |g pages:758-768 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2023.05.014 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 20 |j 2023 |e 8 |b 20 |c 08 |h 758-768 | ||