An Outcome Comparison Between Geriatric and Nongeriatric Emergency Departments
Copyright © 2023 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe diagnosis rates and compare common process outcomes between geriatric emergency departments (EDs) and nongeriatric EDs participating in the American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Emergency Data Registry (CEDR).
METHODS: We conducted an observational study of ED visits in calendar year 2021 within the CEDR by older adults. The analytic sample included 6,444,110 visits at 38 geriatric EDs and 152 matched nongeriatric EDs, with the geriatric ED status determined based on linkage to the American College of Emergency Physicians' Geriatric ED Accreditation program. Stratified by age, we assessed diagnosis rates (X/1000) for 4 common geriatric syndrome conditions and a set of common process outcomes including the ED length of stay, discharge rates, and 72-hour revisit rates.
RESULTS: Across all age categories, geriatric EDs had higher diagnosis rates than nongeriatric EDs for 3 of the 4 following geriatric syndrome conditions of interest: urinary tract infection, dementia, and delirium/altered mental status. The median ED site-level length of stay for older adults was lower at geriatric EDs compared with that at nongeriatric EDs, whereas 72-hour revisit rates were similar across all age categories. Geriatric EDs exhibited a median discharge rate of 67.5% for adults aged 65 to 74 years, 60.8% for adults aged 75 to 84 years, and 55.6% for adults aged >85 years. Comparatively, the median discharge rate at nongeriatric ED sites was 69.0% for adults aged 65 to 74 years, 64.2% for adults aged 75 to 84 years, and 61.3% for adults aged >85 years.
CONCLUSION: Geriatric EDs had higher geriatric syndrome diagnosis rates, lower ED lengths of stay, and similar discharge and 72-hour revisit rates when compared with nongeriatric EDs in the CEDR. These findings provide the first benchmarks for emergency care process outcomes in geriatric EDs compared with nongeriatric EDs.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:82 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Annals of emergency medicine - 82(2023), 6 vom: 07. Dez., Seite 681-689 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Gettel, Cameron J [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Journal Article |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 24.11.2023 Date Revised 12.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.05.013 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM358907446 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM358907446 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240312233111.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.05.013 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1324.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM358907446 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37389490 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0196-0644(23)00378-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gettel, Cameron J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 3 | |a An Outcome Comparison Between Geriatric and Nongeriatric Emergency Departments |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 24.11.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 12.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2023 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe diagnosis rates and compare common process outcomes between geriatric emergency departments (EDs) and nongeriatric EDs participating in the American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Emergency Data Registry (CEDR) | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: We conducted an observational study of ED visits in calendar year 2021 within the CEDR by older adults. The analytic sample included 6,444,110 visits at 38 geriatric EDs and 152 matched nongeriatric EDs, with the geriatric ED status determined based on linkage to the American College of Emergency Physicians' Geriatric ED Accreditation program. Stratified by age, we assessed diagnosis rates (X/1000) for 4 common geriatric syndrome conditions and a set of common process outcomes including the ED length of stay, discharge rates, and 72-hour revisit rates | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Across all age categories, geriatric EDs had higher diagnosis rates than nongeriatric EDs for 3 of the 4 following geriatric syndrome conditions of interest: urinary tract infection, dementia, and delirium/altered mental status. The median ED site-level length of stay for older adults was lower at geriatric EDs compared with that at nongeriatric EDs, whereas 72-hour revisit rates were similar across all age categories. Geriatric EDs exhibited a median discharge rate of 67.5% for adults aged 65 to 74 years, 60.8% for adults aged 75 to 84 years, and 55.6% for adults aged >85 years. Comparatively, the median discharge rate at nongeriatric ED sites was 69.0% for adults aged 65 to 74 years, 64.2% for adults aged 75 to 84 years, and 61.3% for adults aged >85 years | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Geriatric EDs had higher geriatric syndrome diagnosis rates, lower ED lengths of stay, and similar discharge and 72-hour revisit rates when compared with nongeriatric EDs in the CEDR. These findings provide the first benchmarks for emergency care process outcomes in geriatric EDs compared with nongeriatric EDs | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hwang, Ula |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Janke, Alexander T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rothenberg, Craig |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tomasino, Debra F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schneider, Sandra M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Goyal, Pawan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Venkatesh, Arjun K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of emergency medicine |d 1984 |g 82(2023), 6 vom: 07. Dez., Seite 681-689 |w (DE-627)NLM012918288 |x 1097-6760 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:82 |g year:2023 |g number:6 |g day:07 |g month:12 |g pages:681-689 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.05.013 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 82 |j 2023 |e 6 |b 07 |c 12 |h 681-689 | ||