Evaluation methods of clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine
Clinical efficacy is the basis for the development of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), and the evaluation of clinical efficacy of TCM has always been the focus of attention. The technical and methodological difficulties in the evaluation process often restrict the generation of high-level evidence. Therefore, methodological research should be deepened and innovative practice should be carried out to study the application of scientific research methods in the evaluation of the advantages of TCM. After more than ten years of development, the clinical efficacy evaluation of TCM, on the basis of the initially classic placebo randomized controlled trials, has successively carried out a series of meaningful attempts and explorations in N-of-1 trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, real world studies, narrative medicine studies, systematic evaluation, and other aspects, laying the foundation for the transformation of TCM from "experience" to "evidence". This paper focused on the clinical efficacy evaluation of TCM, summarized the main connotation and development status of efficacy evaluation indicators, standards, and methods, and put forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions for the problems of indicator selection, standard formulation, and methodology optimization in the research process. It is clear that scientific and objective evaluation of the efficacy of TCM is an urgent problem to be solved at present.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:48 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica - 48(2023), 12 vom: 29. Juni, Seite 3263-3268 |
| Sprache: |
Chinesisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Zhuang, Ming [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Clinical research |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 30.06.2023 Date Revised 30.06.2023 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20230219.502 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM358833000 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM358833000 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226075603.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||chi c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20230219.502 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1196.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM358833000 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37382010 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a chi | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zhuang, Ming |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation methods of clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 30.06.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 30.06.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Clinical efficacy is the basis for the development of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), and the evaluation of clinical efficacy of TCM has always been the focus of attention. The technical and methodological difficulties in the evaluation process often restrict the generation of high-level evidence. Therefore, methodological research should be deepened and innovative practice should be carried out to study the application of scientific research methods in the evaluation of the advantages of TCM. After more than ten years of development, the clinical efficacy evaluation of TCM, on the basis of the initially classic placebo randomized controlled trials, has successively carried out a series of meaningful attempts and explorations in N-of-1 trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, real world studies, narrative medicine studies, systematic evaluation, and other aspects, laying the foundation for the transformation of TCM from "experience" to "evidence". This paper focused on the clinical efficacy evaluation of TCM, summarized the main connotation and development status of efficacy evaluation indicators, standards, and methods, and put forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions for the problems of indicator selection, standard formulation, and methodology optimization in the research process. It is clear that scientific and objective evaluation of the efficacy of TCM is an urgent problem to be solved at present | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a English Abstract | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a clinical research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a evaluation of efficacy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a methodology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a traditional Chinese medicine | |
| 700 | 1 | |a An, Jia-Li |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhong, Meng-Yuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Chun-Yang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a DU, Xue-Chen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhai, Jia-Ni |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zheng, Wen-Ke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica |d 1989 |g 48(2023), 12 vom: 29. Juni, Seite 3263-3268 |w (DE-627)NLM012733113 |x 1001-5302 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:48 |g year:2023 |g number:12 |g day:29 |g month:06 |g pages:3263-3268 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20230219.502 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 48 |j 2023 |e 12 |b 29 |c 06 |h 3263-3268 | ||