The QuantuMDx Q-POC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay for rapid detection of COVID-19 at point-of-care : preliminary evaluation of a novel technology
© 2023. The Author(s)..
Accurate and rapid point-of-care (PoC) diagnostics are critical to the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. The current standard for accurate diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 is laboratory-based reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays. Here, a preliminary prospective performance evaluation of the QuantuMDx Q-POC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay is reported. Between November 2020 and March 2021, 49 longitudinal combined nose/throat (NT) swabs from 29 individuals hospitalised with RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 were obtained at St George's Hospital, London. In addition, 101 mid-nasal (MN) swabs were obtained from healthy volunteers in June 2021. These samples were used to evaluate the Q-POC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay. The primary analysis was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Q-POC test against a reference laboratory-based RT-PCR assay. The overall sensitivity of the Q-POC test compared with the reference test was 96.88% (83.78- 99.92% CI) for a cycle threshold (Ct) cut-off value for the reference test of 35 and 80.00% (64.35-90.95% CI) without altering the reference test's Ct cut-off value of 40. The Q-POC test is a sensitive, specific and rapid PoC test for SARS-CoV-2 at a reference Ct cut-off value of 35. The Q-POC test provides an accurate option for RT-PCR at PoC without the need for sample pre-processing and laboratory handling, enabling rapid diagnosis and clinical triage in acute care and other settings.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:13 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Scientific reports - 13(2023), 1 vom: 17. Juni, Seite 9827 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Caffry, Jessica [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 19.06.2023 Date Revised 20.03.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1038/s41598-023-35479-9 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM358321514 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM358321514 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240320233212.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1038/s41598-023-35479-9 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1337.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM358321514 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37330592 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Caffry, Jessica |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The QuantuMDx Q-POC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay for rapid detection of COVID-19 at point-of-care |b preliminary evaluation of a novel technology |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 19.06.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 20.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2023. The Author(s). | ||
520 | |a Accurate and rapid point-of-care (PoC) diagnostics are critical to the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. The current standard for accurate diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 is laboratory-based reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays. Here, a preliminary prospective performance evaluation of the QuantuMDx Q-POC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay is reported. Between November 2020 and March 2021, 49 longitudinal combined nose/throat (NT) swabs from 29 individuals hospitalised with RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 were obtained at St George's Hospital, London. In addition, 101 mid-nasal (MN) swabs were obtained from healthy volunteers in June 2021. These samples were used to evaluate the Q-POC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay. The primary analysis was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Q-POC test against a reference laboratory-based RT-PCR assay. The overall sensitivity of the Q-POC test compared with the reference test was 96.88% (83.78- 99.92% CI) for a cycle threshold (Ct) cut-off value for the reference test of 35 and 80.00% (64.35-90.95% CI) without altering the reference test's Ct cut-off value of 40. The Q-POC test is a sensitive, specific and rapid PoC test for SARS-CoV-2 at a reference Ct cut-off value of 35. The Q-POC test provides an accurate option for RT-PCR at PoC without the need for sample pre-processing and laboratory handling, enabling rapid diagnosis and clinical triage in acute care and other settings | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
700 | 1 | |a Selby, Matthew |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Barr, Katie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Morgan, George |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a McGurk, David |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Scully, Philip |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Park, Catherine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Caridis, Anna-Maria |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Southworth, Emily |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Morrison, Jack |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Clark, David J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Davies, Benedict M O |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Eckersley, Nicholas M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Groppelli, Elisabetta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kirwan, Daniela E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Monahan, Irene |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Augustin, Yolanda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Toombs, Colin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Planche, Tim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Staines, Henry M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Krishna, Sanjeev |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Scientific reports |d 2011 |g 13(2023), 1 vom: 17. Juni, Seite 9827 |w (DE-627)NLM215703936 |x 2045-2322 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:17 |g month:06 |g pages:9827 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35479-9 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 13 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 17 |c 06 |h 9827 |