Analysis of Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19 Compared to Non-COVID Etiologies
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of veno-venous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 versus non-COVID causes at US academic centers.
BACKGROUND DATA: V-V ECMO support has been utilized for COVID-19 patients with ARDS since the beginning of the pandemic. Mortality for ECMO in COVID-19 has been reported to be high but similar to reported mortality for ECMO support for non-COVID causes of respiratory failure.
METHODS: Using ICD-10 codes, data of patients who underwent V-V ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS were compared with patients who underwent V-V ECMO for non-COVID causes between April 2020 and December 2022. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures included length of stay and direct cost. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was performed to analyze differences in mortality between COVID and non-COVID groups, adjusting for other important risk factors (age, sex, and race/ethnicity).
RESULTS: We identified and compared 6382 patients who underwent V-V ECMO for non-COVID causes to 6040 patients who underwent V-V ECMO for COVID-19. There was a significantly higher proportion of patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent V-V ECMO in the non-COVID group compared with the COVID group (19.8% vs. 3.7%, respectively, P <0.001). Compared with patients who underwent V-V ECMO for non-COVID causes, patients who underwent V-V ECMO for COVID had increased in-hospital mortality (47.6% vs. 34.5%, P <0.001), length of stay (46.5±41.1 days vs. 40.6±46.1, P <0.001), and direct hospitalization cost ($207,022±$208,842 vs. $198,508±205,510, P =0.02). Compared with the non-COVID group, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for in-hospital mortality in the COVID group was 2.03 (95% CI: 1.87-2.20, P <0.001). In-hospital mortality for V-V ECMO in COVID-19 improved during the study time period (50.3% in 2020, 48.6% in 2021, and 37.3% in 2022). However, there was a precipitous drop in the ECMO case volume for COVID starting in quarter 2 of 2022.
CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide analysis, COVID-19 patients with ARDS requiring V-V ECMO support had increased mortality compared with patients who underwent V-V ECMO for non-COVID etiologies.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:278 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Annals of surgery - 278(2023), 3 vom: 01. Sept., Seite 464-470 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Ruhi-Williams, Perisa [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 11.08.2023 Date Revised 29.08.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1097/SLA.0000000000005959 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM358274850 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM358274850 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226074407.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005959 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1194.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM358274850 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37325899 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ruhi-Williams, Perisa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Analysis of Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19 Compared to Non-COVID Etiologies |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 11.08.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 29.08.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of veno-venous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 versus non-COVID causes at US academic centers | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND DATA: V-V ECMO support has been utilized for COVID-19 patients with ARDS since the beginning of the pandemic. Mortality for ECMO in COVID-19 has been reported to be high but similar to reported mortality for ECMO support for non-COVID causes of respiratory failure | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Using ICD-10 codes, data of patients who underwent V-V ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS were compared with patients who underwent V-V ECMO for non-COVID causes between April 2020 and December 2022. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures included length of stay and direct cost. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was performed to analyze differences in mortality between COVID and non-COVID groups, adjusting for other important risk factors (age, sex, and race/ethnicity) | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: We identified and compared 6382 patients who underwent V-V ECMO for non-COVID causes to 6040 patients who underwent V-V ECMO for COVID-19. There was a significantly higher proportion of patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent V-V ECMO in the non-COVID group compared with the COVID group (19.8% vs. 3.7%, respectively, P <0.001). Compared with patients who underwent V-V ECMO for non-COVID causes, patients who underwent V-V ECMO for COVID had increased in-hospital mortality (47.6% vs. 34.5%, P <0.001), length of stay (46.5±41.1 days vs. 40.6±46.1, P <0.001), and direct hospitalization cost ($207,022±$208,842 vs. $198,508±205,510, P =0.02). Compared with the non-COVID group, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for in-hospital mortality in the COVID group was 2.03 (95% CI: 1.87-2.20, P <0.001). In-hospital mortality for V-V ECMO in COVID-19 improved during the study time period (50.3% in 2020, 48.6% in 2021, and 37.3% in 2022). However, there was a precipitous drop in the ECMO case volume for COVID starting in quarter 2 of 2022 | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide analysis, COVID-19 patients with ARDS requiring V-V ECMO support had increased mortality compared with patients who underwent V-V ECMO for non-COVID etiologies | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Wu, Baolin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nahmias, Jeffry |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sagebin, Fabio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fazl Alizadeh, Reza |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gadde, Kishore M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Amin, Alpesh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nguyen, Ninh T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of surgery |d 1885 |g 278(2023), 3 vom: 01. Sept., Seite 464-470 |w (DE-627)NLM000026654 |x 1528-1140 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:278 |g year:2023 |g number:3 |g day:01 |g month:09 |g pages:464-470 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005959 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 278 |j 2023 |e 3 |b 01 |c 09 |h 464-470 |