Does the same lesion index mean the same efficacy and safety profile : influence of the differential power, time, and contact force on the lesion size and steam pops under the same lesion index

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature..

BACKGROUND: The lesion index (LSI) helps predict the lesion size and is widely used in ablation of various types of arrhythmias. However, the influence of the ablation settings on the lesion formation and incidence of steam pops under the same LSI value remains unclear.

METHODS: Using a contact force (CF) sensing catheter (TactiCath™) in an ex vivo swine left ventricle model, RF lesions were created with a combination of various power steps (30 W, 40 W, 50 W) and CFs (10 g, 20 g, 30 g, 40 g, 50 g) under the same LSI values (5.2 and 7.0). The correlation between the lesion formation and ablation parameters was evaluated.

RESULTS: Ninety RF lesions were created under a target LSI value of 5.2, and eighty-four were developed under a target LSI value of 7.0. In the LSI 5.2 group, the resultant lesion size widely varied according to the ablation power, and a multiple regression analysis indicated that the ablation energy delivered was the best predictor of the lesion formation. To create a lesion depth > 4 mm, an ablation energy of 393 J is the best cutoff value, suggesting a possibility that ablation energy may be used as a supplemental marker that better monitors the progress of the lesion formation in an LSI 5.2 ablation. In contrast, such inconsistency was not obvious in the LSI 7.0 group. Compared with 30 W, the 50-W ablation exhibited a higher incidence of steam pops in both the LSI 5.2 and 7.0 groups.

CONCLUSIONS: The LSI-lesion size relationship was not necessarily consistent, especially for an LSI of 5.2. To avoid any unintentional, weak ablation, the ablation energy may be a useful supportive parameter (393 J as a cutoff value for a 4-mm depth) during ablation with an LSI around 5.2. Thanks to a prolonged ablation time, the LSI-lesion size relationship is consistent for an LSI of 7.0. However, it is accompanied by a high incidence of steam pops. Care should be given to the ablation settings even when the same LSI value is used.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2024

Erschienen:

2024

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:67

Enthalten in:

Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing - 67(2024), 1 vom: 06. Jan., Seite 147-155

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Higuchi, Syunta [VerfasserIn]
Kawano, Daisuke [VerfasserIn]
Sasaki, Wataru [VerfasserIn]
Matsumoto, Kazuhisa [VerfasserIn]
Tanaka, Naomichi [VerfasserIn]
Mori, Hitoshi [VerfasserIn]
Tsutsui, Kenta [VerfasserIn]
Ikeda, Yoshifumi [VerfasserIn]
Arai, Takahide [VerfasserIn]
Nakano, Shintaro [VerfasserIn]
Kato, Ritsushi [VerfasserIn]
Matsumoto, Kazuo [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Contact force
Ex vivo experiment
Journal Article
Lesion index
Lesion size
Radiofrequency ablation
Steam

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 08.01.2024

Date Revised 08.01.2024

published: Print-Electronic

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1007/s10840-023-01583-z

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM358136350