Dimensional and social comparisons in a health fitness context

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature..

Whereas prior research has found that people are influenced by both internal (e.g., dimensional) and external (e.g., social) comparative information in academic contexts, we experimentally examined the influence of such comparisons in a health fitness context. Participants engaged in "physical and mental fitness" tasks (e.g., performing sit-ups, memorizing words) and were randomly assigned to receive (1) social comparative feedback indicating their physical or mental fitness was better or worse than their peers or (2) dimensional comparative feedback indicating their performance in a target domain (e.g., mental fitness) was better or worse than a referent domain (e.g., physical fitness). Results showed that participants who made upward comparisons had lower fitness self-evaluations and more negative (less positive) emotional reactions to the feedback for the target domain, with the effect being nominally stronger for social than dimensional comparisons and for mental than physical fitness. Findings are discussed in the context of comparison-based models and health behavior theories.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2024

Erschienen:

2024

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:47

Enthalten in:

Journal of behavioral medicine - 47(2024), 1 vom: 26. Feb., Seite 15-26

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Rose, Jason P [VerfasserIn]
Edmonds, Keith A [VerfasserIn]
Beeler, Chloe N [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Behavioral intentions
Comparison processes
Dimensional comparison
Health
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Self-evaluation
Social comparison

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 15.02.2024

Date Revised 26.02.2024

published: Print-Electronic

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1007/s10865-023-00414-w

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM357461428