Anticipatory prescribing in community end-of-life care : systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence since 2017
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ..
BACKGROUND: The anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications is recommended practice in controlling distressing symptoms in the last days of life. A 2017 systematic review found practice and guidance was based on inadequate evidence. Since then, there has been considerable additional research, warranting a new review.
AIM: To review the evidence published since 2017 concerning anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications for adults at the end-of-life in the community, to inform practice and guidance.
DESIGN: Systematic review and narrative synthesis.
METHODS: Nine literature databases were searched from May 2017 to March 2022, alongside reference, citation and journal hand-searches. Gough's Weight of Evidence framework was used to appraise included studies.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight papers were included in the synthesis. Evidence published since 2017 shows that standardised prescribing of four medications for anticipated symptoms is commonplace in the UK; evidence of practices in other countries is limited. There is limited data on how often medications are administered in the community. Prescriptions are 'accepted' by family caregivers despite inadequate explanations and they generally appreciate having access to medications. Robust evidence of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of anticipatory prescribing remains absent.
CONCLUSION: The evidence underpinning anticipatory prescribing practice and policy remains based primarily on healthcare professionals' perceptions that the intervention is reassuring, provides effective, timely symptom relief in the community and prevents crisis hospital admissions. There is still inadequate evidence regarding optimal medications and dose ranges, and the effectiveness of these prescriptions. Patient and family caregiver experiences of anticipatory prescriptions warrant urgent investigation.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42016052108.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:13 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMJ supportive & palliative care - 13(2024), e3 vom: 08. Jan., Seite e612-e623 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Bowers, Ben [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Clinical decisions |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 04.04.2024 Date Revised 04.04.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1136/spcare-2022-004080 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM357389107 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM357389107 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240405233036.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/spcare-2022-004080 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1366.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM357389107 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37236648 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bowers, Ben |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Anticipatory prescribing in community end-of-life care |b systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence since 2017 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 04.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 04.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: The anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications is recommended practice in controlling distressing symptoms in the last days of life. A 2017 systematic review found practice and guidance was based on inadequate evidence. Since then, there has been considerable additional research, warranting a new review | ||
| 520 | |a AIM: To review the evidence published since 2017 concerning anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications for adults at the end-of-life in the community, to inform practice and guidance | ||
| 520 | |a DESIGN: Systematic review and narrative synthesis | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Nine literature databases were searched from May 2017 to March 2022, alongside reference, citation and journal hand-searches. Gough's Weight of Evidence framework was used to appraise included studies | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Twenty-eight papers were included in the synthesis. Evidence published since 2017 shows that standardised prescribing of four medications for anticipated symptoms is commonplace in the UK; evidence of practices in other countries is limited. There is limited data on how often medications are administered in the community. Prescriptions are 'accepted' by family caregivers despite inadequate explanations and they generally appreciate having access to medications. Robust evidence of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of anticipatory prescribing remains absent | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The evidence underpinning anticipatory prescribing practice and policy remains based primarily on healthcare professionals' perceptions that the intervention is reassuring, provides effective, timely symptom relief in the community and prevents crisis hospital admissions. There is still inadequate evidence regarding optimal medications and dose ranges, and the effectiveness of these prescriptions. Patient and family caregiver experiences of anticipatory prescriptions warrant urgent investigation | ||
| 520 | |a PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42016052108 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a clinical decisions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a drug administration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a home care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a pain | |
| 650 | 4 | |a symptoms and symptom management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a terminal care | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Antunes, Bárbara Costa Pereira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Etkind, Simon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hopkins, Sarah A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Winterburn, Isaac |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kuhn, Isla |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pollock, Kristian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Barclay, Stephen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMJ supportive & palliative care |d 2011 |g 13(2024), e3 vom: 08. Jan., Seite e612-e623 |w (DE-627)NLM226675734 |x 2045-4368 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2024 |g number:e3 |g day:08 |g month:01 |g pages:e612-e623 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2022-004080 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 13 |j 2024 |e e3 |b 08 |c 01 |h e612-e623 | ||